http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51526
Bug #: 51526
Summary: [C++11][constexpr] constexpr delegating constructor
should be accepted
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51475
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42768
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51476
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51509
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-13 09:07:38 UTC ---
At least part of the problem here is the uninitialised
variable in the vld4 call. GCC tries to create a zero
initialisation of "x" before the vld4, so that the other
lan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47456
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-13
09:18:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> valgrind output:
> ==18442==by 0x52BD26: traverse_ns (symbol.c:)
(In reply to comment #1)
> The ICE seems to have been fixed on trunk between revisi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz 2011-12-13 09:18:55
UTC ---
Hmm, other way to solve this might be to add to structure the optional
attribute gcc_struct. At least I used that to fix libquadmath for 32-bit IA
Windows.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51509
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-13 09:20:54 UTC ---
FWIW,
uint8x8x4_t x;
uint8x8x2_t y;
x = vld4_dup_u8(src);
y.val[0] = x.val[1];
y.val[1] = x.val[2];
vst2_lane_u8(dst, y, 0);
does give the expected outpu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23885
rockeet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rockeet at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from ro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23885
--- Comment #10 from rockeet 2011-12-13 09:38:45 UTC
---
Sorry, missed output of g++ 4.6.0:
Begin Output
void f(A)
void f(B)
void f(B)
void f(T) [with T = int]
void f(T) [with T = int*]
End Output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou 2011-12-13
10:05:54 UTC ---
> Hmm, other way to solve this might be to add to structure the optional
> attribute gcc_struct. At least I used that to fix libquadmath for 32-bit IA
> Windows.
Thanks. Let's avoi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-13 10:27:48 UTC ---
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, duyuehai at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254
>
> Yuehai Du changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498
--- Comment #5 from gee 2011-12-13 10:48:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> None of the testsuite Makefiles for other libraries do anything similar
> (libgomp, libstdc++-v3, ..., so why is libjava so special that it needs it?).
> make check def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51525
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51523
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mingw32
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-13
11:06:55 UTC ---
The EDGE_FALLTHRU flag is wrong if any of EDGE_TRUE/FALSE_* is added which
is probably what happens. Thus the patch was wrong.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51523
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
Dmitry Vyukov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at google dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51519
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51517
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.6
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou 2011-12-13
11:21:32 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Dec 13 11:21:28 2011
New Revision: 182275
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182275
Log:
PR ada/49084
* types.h (Byte): Change
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-13
11:24:44 UTC ---
The following is a real fix I'm going to test.
@@ -1601,6 +1605,7 @@ replace_uses_by (tree name, tree val)
if (gimple_code (stmt) != GIMPLE_PHI)
{
gimple_s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51523
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Richard Gu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41951
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-13
11:40:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Given that NAG 5.2 compiles it and as "assign" is only called via
> "assignment(=)", there must be some issue with the assignment resolution.
Actually, I wo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51476
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51527
Bug #: 51527
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault: 'convert_to_integer' enters
infinite recursion
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51527
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-12-13
12:30:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 26069
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26069
Log output, FYI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51527
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51520
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-12-13
12:49:31 UTC ---
> At least I hope for some smaller patch than the big constructor patch (Rev.
> 181425).
Sadly enough, this pr has been fixed by r181425 (r181424 gives the ICE).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51519
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-13
12:55:00 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 13 12:54:57 2011
New Revision: 182279
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182279
Log:
2011-12-13 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-13
12:56:13 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 13 12:56:09 2011
New Revision: 182280
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182280
Log:
2011-12-13 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51519
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51362
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51117
--- Comment #9 from Michael Matz 2011-12-13 13:59:42
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Tue Dec 13 13:59:35 2011
New Revision: 182283
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182283
Log:
PR tree-optimization/51117
* tree-eh.c (sink_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51481
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-13
14:01:04 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Dec 13 14:00:58 2011
New Revision: 182284
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182284
Log:
Revert
2011-12-12 Jakub Jelinek
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51524
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51117
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-13
14:07:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > May you please take a look at this message where I describe why I had done
> > the
> > change:
> > http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-13
14:12:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > (In reply to comment #3)
> > > Hi Richard,
> > >
> > > May you please take a look at this message where I describe why I had
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51524
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2011-12-13 14:21:37
UTC ---
Index: gcc.target/i386/bmi2-mulx32-1.c
===
--- gcc.target/i386/bmi2-mulx32-1.c (revision 182271)
+++ gcc.target/i386/b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354
--- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-13
14:43:50 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Dec 13 14:43:44 2011
New Revision: 182286
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182286
Log:
2011-12-13 Richard Guenther
PR lto/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51477
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51491
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-13 15:00:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 26070
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26070
update tentative patch
now testing on x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51524
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-13 15:00:19 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Dec 13 15:00:09 2011
New Revision: 182287
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182287
Log:
PR testsuite/51524
* gcc.target/i386
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51524
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
Bug #: 51528
Summary: SRA should not create BOOLEAN_TYPE replacements
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor 2011-12-13
15:26:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 26071
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26071
Testcase
This is the aforementioned test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51528
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51443
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-12-13
15:38:54 UTC ---
Proposed fix,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00995.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51362
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2011-12-13
15:43:39 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Dec 13 15:43:36 2011
New Revision: 182288
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182288
Log:
2011-12-13 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51503
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-13
15:45:45 UTC ---
No, that doesn't seem to cause the C++ frontend to be enabled, instead we
do such magic via config-lang.in fragments - no such thing exists for
target libraries (yet). See the topl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51476
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-12-13
15:51:52 UTC ---
A candidate patch was posted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00996.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51362
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51439
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2011-12-13
15:58:17 UTC ---
Indeed it is and I have just verified that it is also fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50628
--- Comment #14 from Martin Jambor 2011-12-13
16:08:19 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Dec 13 16:08:14 2011
New Revision: 182289
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182289
Log:
2011-12-13 Martin Jambor
PR middle-end/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50628
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51499
--- Comment #14 from Ira Rosen 2011-12-13 16:27:19 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #13)
>
> However, I don't fully understand Richard Guenther's example. Yes his
> example requires -fassociative-math to be vectorized, however, my example
> would tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51529
Bug #: 51529
Summary: gfortran.dg/class_to_type_1.f03 is miscompiled:
Uninitialized variable used
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51530
Bug #: 51530
Summary: internal compiler error: in unify, at cp/pt.c:16854
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51530
--- Comment #1 from Dave Abrahams 2011-12-13
17:46:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 26072
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26072
reproducer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51443
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51529
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas 2011-12-13 18:14:49
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> $ gfortran -g gfortran.dg/class_to_type_1.f03
> $ MALLOC_PERTURB_= ./a.out
> $ MALLOC_PERTURB_=33 ./a.out
>
> A fatal error occurred! Backtrace for this error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14258
--- Comment #15 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-13 18:47:04 UTC ---
Author: fabien
Date: Tue Dec 13 18:46:58 2011
New Revision: 182292
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182292
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2011-12-11 Fa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
--- Comment #19 from Joel Sherrill 2011-12-13
19:10:10 UTC ---
Time to close this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51531
Bug #: 51531
Summary: bool conversion to pointer should warn
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532
Bug #: 51532
Summary: Invalid Code Generated for cpu32.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51533
Bug #: 51533
Summary: initialization with uninitialized member should warn
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.1
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2011-12-13 19:24:37
UTC ---
Created attachment 26073
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26073
Test case
-libssp
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20111213 (experimental) [trunk revision 182291] (GCC)
$ cat ~/foo.c
#include
void foo (unsigned * src, unsigned *dst, int width)
{
const int32x4_t vec_alpha_shift = vdupq_n_s32 (0);
const uint32x4_t vec_one = vdupq_n_u32 (1u);
const uint32x4_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51533
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse 2011-12-13
19:29:03 UTC ---
-Winit-self ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14258
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51505
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Bonzini 2011-12-13 19:34:25
UTC ---
No, it should be easy. Just look at the EQ_USES in df_kill_notes and, if one
EQ_USE refers to a dead pseudo, kill the REG_EQUAL or REG_EQUIV note.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49865
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612
--- Comment #20 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-12-13
19:40:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> Time to close this?
Not until the patch gets applied to gcc-4.6 branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51534
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-12-13
19:47:28 UTC ---
I truncated the actual error emitted by the assembler.
$ ./xgcc -B. -O3 -ftree-vectorize -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp ~/foo.c
-march=armv7-a -c
/tmp/ccCPCd9Z.s: Assembler messages:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51531
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-13
19:53:02 UTC ---
with 4.7
b.cc: In function 'int main()':
b.cc:4:14: warning: converting 'false' to pointer type 'int*'
[-Wconversion-null]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51533
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18016
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tutufan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51531
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48420
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tutufan at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-12-13
20:04:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Created attachment 25088 [details]
>
>
> After expanding 4.7 contains:
>
> (insn 52 51 53 6 (set (reg:QI 83 [ D.2723 ])
> (mem:QI (plus:SI (re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48820
Walter Spector changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||w6ws at earthlink dot net
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51532
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2011-12-13 20:47:47
UTC ---
The use of cas is currently dependent on TARGET_68020, which is true on cpu32,
but there needs to be a TARGET_CAS flag.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51535
Bug #: 51535
Summary: Optimization problem with -finit-real=snan at -O1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51536
Bug #: 51536
Summary: ICE on mips64 with -march=octeon -O2 -g
-fno-omit-frame-pointer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51536
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mips64-*-linux-gnu
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51477
--- Comment #1 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-12-13
21:53:07 UTC ---
Candidate patch posted to
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg01052.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51537
Bug #: 51537
Summary: ICE in verify_flow_info while building libstdc++-v3
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rmansfield at qnx dot com
--- Comment #7
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
