http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51235
Bug #: 51235
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2137 (unrecognizable
insn) with -O -ftree-vectorize -mavx2 -mxop
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113
--- Comment #9 from Nathan Sidwell 2011-11-20
09:09:39 UTC ---
Author: nathan
Date: Sun Nov 20 09:09:34 2011
New Revision: 181524
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181524
Log:
PR gcov-profile/51113
* coverage.c (build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51236
Bug #: 51236
Summary: ICE: in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:641 with -O
-ftree-vectorize -mavx2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51235
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
--- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-11-20 12:43:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> > > FAIL: 30_threads/thread/native_handle/typesizes.cc execution test
> >
> > This test should be disabled on darwin (and probably everywhere excep
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
--- Comment #28 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-11-20 12:50:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> confirm solved
> cat once.cpp
> #include
>
> int main() {
>
> std::once_flag flag;
> std::call_once(flag,[](){std::cout << "hi" << std::endl;})
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50074
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-11-20 12:52:05 UTC ---
> This patch fixes the sibcall-6.c failure on Epiphany.
On x86_64-apple-darwin10 too. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263
--- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo 2011-11-20 13:04:39 UTC
---
With trunk rev 181517 I have observed the following problem, which happens when
compiling for -m2*, -m3*, -m4* and -Os:
The function compiled with -m2 -Os
int test_int64_lowword (long l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51237
Bug #: 51237
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/prefetch-[89].c
(internal compiler error) caused by revision 181491
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
--- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-20
13:46:58 UTC ---
Vincenzo's comment shows the test fail for this version
> gcc version 4.7.0 2012 (experimental) (GCC)
But pass for this one:
> gcc version 4.7.0 2017 (experimental) (GCC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
--- Comment #30 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-11-20 14:20:14 UTC ---
sorry Dominique not to have been clear, Jonathan answer is correct.
For what I'm concerned this specific PR can be closed.
vincenzo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51238
Bug #: 51238
Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use
(tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:1267) with -Os
-ftree-loop-distribution
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
figure --disable-bootstrap
--enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/opt/gcc4.7
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 2020 (experimental) (GCC)
SVN revision: 181530
A version from 2009 produced the same error (at a different line number).
The line in question in the current revision, and the two
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50970
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rmansfield at qnx dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51240
Bug #: 51240
Summary: [4.7] fortran bootstrap failure due to non-static
dt_lower_string and dt_upper_string lacking prototypes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51241
Bug #: 51241
Summary: SH Target: Unnecessary sign/zero extensions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51242
Bug #: 51242
Summary: Unable to use strongly typed enums as bit fields
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51243
Bug #: 51243
Summary: internal compiler error: in verify_gimple_stmt, at
tree-cfg.c:4235
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
Bug #: 51244
Summary: SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51242
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51235
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51236
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 2020 (experimental) (GCC)
[regehr@gamow tmp065]$ current-gcc -Ofast -c -w small.c
small.c: In function 'func_1':
small.c:11:1: internal compiler error: in vn_reference_insert_pieces, at
tree-ssa-sccvn.c:1983
Please submit a full bug re
-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 2020 (experimental) (GCC)
[regehr@gamow tmp067]$ current-gcc -c -w -Ofast small.c
small.c: In function 'func_2':
small.c:16:1: internal compiler error: in replace_ref_with, at
tree-predcom.c:1309
Please submit a full bug report,
with pr
++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 2020 (experimental) (GCC)
[regehr@gamow tmp066]$ current-gcc -c -w -O2 small.c
small.c: In function 'func_93':
small.c:9:1: internal compiler error: in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:417
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51235
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-20 22:26:18 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Nov 20 22:26:14 2011
New Revision: 181537
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181537
Log:
PR target/51235
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51236
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-20 22:26:19 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Sun Nov 20 22:26:14 2011
New Revision: 181537
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181537
Log:
PR target/51235
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51235
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51236
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51230
--- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-20 22:37:56 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Nov 20 22:37:54 2011
New Revision: 181538
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181538
Log:
/cp
2011-11-20 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51230
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51248
Bug #: 51248
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with pointer to enum
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51248
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51201
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51249
Bug #: 51249
Summary: semaphore implemetation for linux leaves threads
blocked
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51250
Bug #: 51250
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bug with SUM(,dim,mask)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51221
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51250
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oleg.e...@t-online.de
--- Comment #19 from Ol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251
Bug #: 51251
Summary: SPARC _64 instructions in V7 executables
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251
--- Comment #1 from Joel Sherrill 2011-11-21 00:55:32
UTC ---
Command used to compile and link the test.
/home2/joel/build/b-sparc-fortran/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran \
-L /users/joel/test-gcc/install-svn/sparc-rtems4.11/lib/ \
-B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51241
--- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-11-21
01:52:22 UTC ---
Please put the description of the problem into the trail itself
instead of attachment next time.
The problem looks to be splitted into several issues.
> mov.b @r4+,r3 ! 40
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48322
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-21
02:04:59 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 21 02:04:54 2011
New Revision: 181547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181547
Log:
PR c++/48322
gcc/cp/
* cp-tree.h (PACK_EXPA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51252
Bug #: 51252
Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/tm/freq.c (internal compiler error)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48322
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51072
--- Comment #7 from Gary Funck 2011-11-21 02:53:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > Shouldn't libitm be built with the "stage1" g++ as it is a target library,
> > even with --disable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51249
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51253
Bug #: 51253
Summary: [C++11][DR 1030] Evaluation order (sequenced-before
relation) among intializer-clauses in braced-init-list
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254
Bug #: 51254
Summary: Missed Optimization: IVOPTS don't handle unaligned
memory access.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51254
--- Comment #1 from Yuehai Du 2011-11-21 04:23:44
UTC ---
Created attachment 25870
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25870
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51255
Bug #: 51255
Summary: Using -flto breaks code which puts values in .ctors or
.init_array
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251
--- Comment #2 from David S. Miller 2011-11-21
05:05:02 UTC ---
I'll take a look at this. The branch prediction tags are guarded by either
TARGET_V9 or TARGET_ARCH64, but not TARGET_VIS.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251
--- Comment #3 from David S. Miller 2011-11-21
05:06:09 UTC ---
BTW, Joel, you might want to check out "-mdebug=options" :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51256
Bug #: 51256
Summary: ICE with invalid parameter for __atomic builtin
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51250
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51222
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler
2011-11-21 07:51:49 UTC ---
When fixing this problem, I suggest to add the following tests as well, which
also fail currently (In previous builds sometimes one of these forms worked
when the other failed):
//--
59 matches
Mail list logo
