http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51251

             Bug #: 51251
           Summary: SPARC _64 instructions in V7 executables
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: j...@gcc.gnu.org


Sun Nov 20 19:34:53 UTC 2011 (revision 181531)
But this has probably existed a long time.

Target: sparc-rtems4.11

I am testing gfortran on rtems and it appears that about 1/2 of the failures on
sparc are related to this.  

Some branches have  ",pn" and ",pl" attached and it is not supported.

  0x020012a4 <+36>:    ble,pn   %icc, 0x20013ec <foo_+364>
...
  0x020012f8 <+120>:    be,pn   %icc, 0x20013fc <foo_+380>

I checked sparc.c and there are some cases where the ",pX" are only generated
for sparc64 and others where they are not.

I don't expect this is hard to fix for a sparc maintainer. :)

Reply via email to