http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50683
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-10-19 07:48:30 UTC ---
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, manu at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087
>
> --- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-19
> 01:44:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50789
Bug #: 50789
Summary: Gather vectorization
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41103
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50789
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50788
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl-optimization
Target Milestone|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50786
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50784
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50782
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-19
08:16:34 UTC ---
The interaction of the optimize attribute/pragma with inlining are
"interesting".
For some options we prohibit inlining (but only for the target attribute/pragma
I think), otherwise
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50780
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50779
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Mile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-19
08:34:45 UTC ---
The definition is required, see [class.static.data] p3
"A static data member of literal type can be declared in the class definition
with the constexpr specifier; [...] The member sha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-19
08:46:11 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Oct 19 08:45:45 2011
New Revision: 180179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180179
Log:
PR target/50350
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-19
08:46:12 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Oct 19 08:45:45 2011
New Revision: 180179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180179
Log:
PR target/50350
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50789
--- Comment #2 from Ira Rosen 2011-10-19 08:47:03 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #0)
> To vectorize the above I'm afraid we'd need to modify tree-data-ref.c as well
> as tree-vect-data-ref.c, because the memory accesses aren't affine and already
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-19
08:46:12 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Oct 19 08:45:45 2011
New Revision: 180179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180179
Log:
PR target/50350
Backport from mainline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-19
09:00:43 UTC ---
I have bootstrapped revision 180100 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 configured with
../work/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/gcc4.7w
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,java,ada,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50789
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-19
09:02:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We have something similar for SLP: if an access is not affine we just fill in
> what we can. But I don't really understand what can be filled in for f3/f4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50735
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #119 from Jan Hubicka 2011-10-19
09:22:01 UTC ---
Some up to date perfomrance data. WPA peaks 3.1GB in TOP now. (3261 virt).
Overall compile time is 4m32s real, 21m14 user.
GGC memory is GC 2248537k -> 1727826k
WPA time report:
cal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
--- Comment #2 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-10-19
09:37:17 UTC ---
Hi,
this is obviously a bug (introduced by me).
Memory operand in GCC notation must occur at first place.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
--- Comment #3 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-10-19
09:38:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 25553
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25553
Patch
I am testing it by now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50789
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #4 from Ir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2011-10-19 09:46:50
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hi,
> this is obviously a bug (introduced by me).
> Memory operand in GCC notation must occur at first place.
Please note that gcc also supports Intel notatio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
--- Comment #5 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-10-19
09:48:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Hi,
> > this is obviously a bug (introduced by me).
> > Memory operand in GCC notation must occur at first place.
>
> Please no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50779
--- Comment #3 from Ruben Van Boxem
2011-10-19 10:17:54 UTC ---
Sorry about that:
m:\Development\source\qtcreator\src\shared\proparser\profileparser.cpp: In
member function 'void ProFileParser::leaveScope(ushort*&)':
m:\Development\source\qtcrea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50779
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-19
10:23:37 UTC ---
So it's probably similar to ELF platforms using a weak always-inline function.
Thus a conflict in marking it replacable at link-time and inlinable.
If dllexport does not have this s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50779
--- Comment #5 from Ruben Van Boxem
2011-10-19 10:37:37 UTC ---
There's this on msdn about inline and dllexport:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/xa0d9ste.aspx
On top of this, MSVC allows its __forceinline to be used in a dllexport
contex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38761
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #3 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-10-19
10:55:28 UTC ---
Could I have ssh access to one of the boxes that fail?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50733
Jan Waclawek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wek at host dot sk
--- Comment #1 from Jan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40872
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50790
Bug #: 50790
Summary: ICE in copy_constant on divide by expression that
evaluates to zero
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34352
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50310
--- Comment #16 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-10-19
12:17:41 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Wed Oct 19 12:17:35 2011
New Revision: 180184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180184
Log:
PR target/50310
* config/spu/spu.c (sp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-19 12:22:04
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Could I have ssh access to one of the boxes that fail?
unfortunately, I can't do that - company boxes here afflicted by company
policy;
Jack Howarth seems to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-19
12:43:59 UTC ---
test::value is an lvalue, binding a reference to it is an odr-use
(1*test::value) produces an rvalue, the reference is not bound to test::value,
so it is not odr-used
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-19
12:46:00 UTC ---
and I assume -O eliminates the reference binding due to inlining and value
propagation
this all seems normal for a missing definition of a static const member, like
dozens of other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50340
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Monakov 2011-10-19
12:46:48 UTC ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Wed Oct 19 12:46:44 2011
New Revision: 180186
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180186
Log:
2011-10-19 Andrey Belevantsev
PR rtl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-19
12:47:47 UTC ---
I agree, I agree.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40872
--- Comment #23 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-19 12:46:48 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Oct 19 12:46:42 2011
New Revision: 180185
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180185
Log:
2011-10-19 Paolo Carlini
PR c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50340
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P3
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38761
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-19 12:46:47 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Oct 19 12:46:42 2011
New Revision: 180185
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180185
Log:
2011-10-19 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38761
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Krügler
2011-10-19 12:54:24 UTC ---
I agree that the test case should require the definition of the static member,
the actual reason being that the constraint in 3.2 p2,
"[..] unless it is an object that satisfies the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50791
--- Comment #1 from yar at sibnet dot ru 2011-10-19 12:52:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 2
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2
Similar code, not causing crash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50791
--- Comment #2 from yar at sibnet dot ru 2011-10-19 12:54:59 UTC ---
The code in first attachment make cc1plus stack overflow. The code in second
attachment doesn't.
Backtrace:
#0 dependent_type_p (type=0xb7f22960) at ../../gcc/cp/pt.c:17459
#1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40872
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50791
Bug #: 50791
Summary: internal compiler error in dependent_type_p_r
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50768
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-19
12:59:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 19 12:59:21 2011
New Revision: 180187
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180187
Log:
2011-10-19 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50768
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-19
13:04:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I agree that the test case should require the definition of the static member,
> the actual reason being that the constraint in 3.2 p2,
>
> "[..] unless i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #120 from Jan Hubicka 2011-10-19
13:05:25 UTC ---
weakref reorg saves about 15 seconds, so we have total WPA time 145s and decl
out at 19s (13%).
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785
--- Comment #10 from Daniel Krügler
2011-10-19 13:07:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I disagree. It is odr-used because the lvalue-to-rvalue conversions is not
> immediately applied.
>
> In (1*test::value) the lvalue-to-rvalue conversion
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50766
--- Comment #6 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-10-19
13:09:30 UTC ---
Thread on gcc-patches ML:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01719.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50791
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48638
--- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-19 13:20:29 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Oct 19 13:20:22 2011
New Revision: 180188
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180188
Log:
2011-10-19 Roland Stigge
PR tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49517
--- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-19 13:20:28 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Oct 19 13:20:22 2011
New Revision: 180188
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180188
Log:
2011-10-19 Roland Stigge
PR tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49704
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-19 13:20:29 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Oct 19 13:20:22 2011
New Revision: 180188
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180188
Log:
2011-10-19 Roland Stigge
PR tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48638
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49704
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49517
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47912
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39409
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50793
Bug #: 50793
Summary: G++ doesn't value-initialize all members of
non-trivial type in default argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50777
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50705
--- Comment #11 from SK 2011-10-19 14:22:16
UTC ---
FILE::
/mm/page_alloc.c:5363
flags -> 0x3
HASH_EARLY - > 0x1
CODE::
if (flags & HASH_EARLY)
Assembly:
70307c44: fe 0f e0 54 rlwinm r0,r7,1,31,31
r7 = 0x3 =
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50794
Bug #: 50794
Summary: [picochip] incorrect implementation of ashrsi3 for
negative numbers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50786
--- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen 2011-10-19
14:40:53 UTC ---
I'm not 100% sure which stage generates them, but I have lots of
cc*.o and some others (.res etc.) left over after the LTRANS failure.
After two failures in a row i always have a full /.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50717
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50780
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-19
14:54:41 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 19 14:54:34 2011
New Revision: 180192
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180192
Log:
2011-10-19 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50780
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50447
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-10-19
14:59:05 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Oct 19 14:59:00 2011
New Revision: 180193
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180193
Log:
PR target/50447
* config/avr/avr.md (cc):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50778
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-19
15:01:47 UTC ---
> Could I have ssh access to one of the boxes that fail?
I can give you access to my (slowww) G5 if you mail me your ssh key.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50733
--- Comment #2 from marcos_vc at coel dot com.br 2011-10-19 15:02:10 UTC ---
In that case avr-gcc should print an error/warning when one try to access
variables that way. I'm newbie for this specific target and this code compiles
without any error
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50786
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-19
15:18:21 UTC ---
cc*.o files are supposed to be cleaned up by the driver(s). Are you sure
you are not using -save-temps? ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50790
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50786
--- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen 2011-10-19
15:28:07 UTC ---
I'm not, this was a normal lto bootstrap without any special flags
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087
--- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-19
15:39:08 UTC ---
Thanks for explaining the seen_error mechanism, which I didn't know, but there
is something I still don't understand here. Consider PR49508 (I'm interested
because I opened it ;) : in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-19 15:48:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 25556
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25556
Updated patch, tries to keep dominance info up-to-date.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-19
15:50:04 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Oct 19 15:50:00 2011
New Revision: 180194
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180194
Log:
PR debug/49310
* var-tracking.c (loc_exp_dep, o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
Bug #: 50795
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-expect-[1234].c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50796
Bug #: 50796
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/plugindir[1234].c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087
--- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-19
15:53:01 UTC ---
On this PR, removing the early return *works*, we have two non-bogus warnings
with -Wall and two errors with -Werror. Maybe we should really proceed one PR
at a time, re-open PR49508.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50786
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-19
15:55:22 UTC ---
You would need to debug this then - generally the drivers clean up after
them (and I remember testing this, at least for the non-failing case ...)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50777
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth 2011-10-19 16:02:35 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Wed Oct 19 16:02:30 2011
New Revision: 180195
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180195
Log:
Properly test for madvise on Solaris 10 (PR bootstrap/50
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50795
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50777
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50769
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-19 16:29:52 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Oct 19 16:29:42 2011
New Revision: 180197
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180197
Log:
2011-10-19 Tom de Vries
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50769
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785
--- Comment #11 from trashyankes at wp dot pl 2011-10-19 16:35:06 UTC ---
it will be possible to add better waring/error in this case?
is complicity misleading when you use `static const` or `static constexpr` for
long time and when you try get ref
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50777
--- Comment #7 from Sean McGovern 2011-10-19
16:39:15 UTC ---
Thanks for the fix, bootstrapping that revision now.
-- Sean McG.
--Original Message--
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
To: McGovern, Sean
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/50777] [4.7 regre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-19
16:58:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> it will be possible to add better waring/error in this case?
Not easily, the error you get is from the linker. This has been discussed MANY
times in ot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49459
Paul Koning changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.1.2
--- Comment #2 from Paul Koning 2011
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
