http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50785
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-10-19
12:50:34 UTC ---
I think the important message to vehicle to the users - correct me if I'm wrong
- is that constexpr isn't "miraculous" from this point of view, old-style
static and C++11 static constexpr data members both generally require out of
class definitions.
