[Bug fortran/50410] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in record_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 --- Comment #9 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-18 07:23:10 UTC --- >From the standard: "C568 (R536) A data-i-do-object or a variable that appears as a data-stmt-object shall not be an object designator in which a pointer appears other than as the en

[Bug fortran/45290] [F08] pointer initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45290 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #14

[Bug target/48649] cannot find space to spill in GENERAL REGISTERS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48649 --- Comment #6 from Popielewicz 2011-10-18 07:25:24 UTC --- OK. Because I suspected, that IRA could help I have decided to port 4.4.6, the last with coff. Another motivation was tree-vectorizer. I have discovered immediately , that purge-dead-ed

[Bug middle-end/50706] Fold check failed (expected tree that contains 'typed' structure, have 'block' in fold_checksum_tree, at fold-const.c:13921)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50706 Paulo J. Matos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Paulo.Matos at csr dot com --- Comment #

[Bug middle-end/50706] Fold check failed (expected tree that contains 'typed' structure, have 'block' in fold_checksum_tree, at fold-const.c:13921)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50706 --- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos 2011-10-18 07:51:28 UTC --- Created attachment 25537 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25537 Another testcase.

[Bug inline-asm/50772] New: Inline assembler "A" constrain works non-expectedly on 64-bits target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50772 Bug #: 50772 Summary: Inline assembler "A" constrain works non-expectedly on 64-bits target Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-18 08:26:04 UTC --- On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 > > Paolo Carlini changed: > >What|Remove

[Bug middle-end/50716] Segmentation fault caused by misaligned vector access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50716 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-18 08:46:06 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Oct 18 08:46:00 2011 New Revision: 180125 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180125 Log: 2011-10-18 Richard Guenther PR middle-

[Bug tree-optimization/50672] [4.7 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 --- Comment #11 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18 08:57:43 UTC --- Author: vries Date: Tue Oct 18 08:57:39 2011 New Revision: 180126 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180126 Log: 2011-10-18 Tom de Vries PR tree-o

[Bug middle-end/50741] [4.7 Regression] remove_unused_locals causes seg fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50741 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-18 09:17:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > And of course, it's the ctor cloning: > > DECL_CONTEXT of _rL_53 is , > but current_function_decl is . > > So it's similar to PR50640, in that the initi

[Bug target/50350] [4.6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in canonicalize_float_value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-18 09:19:08 UTC --- Created attachment 25538 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25538 gcc46-pr50350.patch I couldn't reproduce it with a x86_64-linux -> ia64-linux cross, that said, the

[Bug inline-asm/50772] Inline assembler "A" constrain works non-expectedly on 64-bits target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50772 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50771] redundant argument passing code (x64) + inefficient use of stack space

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50771 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/50769] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in phi_alternatives_equal, at tree-cfgcleanup.c:355 with -O2 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-pta

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50769 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/50773] New: float values are printed with greater precision than the float data type has when given as an argument to printf()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50773 Bug #: 50773 Summary: float values are printed with greater precision than the float data type has when given as an argument to printf() Classification: Unclassified Pro

[Bug tree-optimization/50768] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1731 with -O2 -ftracer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50768 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/50767] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1004 with -O2 -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dominator-opts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50767 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-18 09:41:11 UTC --- Indeed, after a day of work I should not even try sending drafts. Anyway, the substantive point I was missing is *per function*. Is there a simple explanation for why the problem didn

[Bug middle-end/50724] cmath's floating-point classification implementations inconsistent with math.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724 --- Comment #33 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-18 09:41:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) > I can't add an attribute to the system isnan from my user code, or can I? > I've > never been quite sure what Paolo was referring to, can someone clue

[Bug tree-optimization/50767] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1004 with -O2 -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dominator-opts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50767 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-18 09:51:17 UTC --- PRE produces : # VUSE <.MEM_4(D)> pretmp.5_8 = 0B; : # .MEM_3 = PHI <.MEM_4(D)(2), .MEM_6(4)> # VUSE <.MEM_3> s.0_1 = s; ss.1_2 = pretmp.5_8; # .MEM_5 = VDEF <.MEM_3

[Bug rtl-optimization/50765] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in expand_insn, at optabs.c:7681 with -ftree-vectorize -fno-tree-dce

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50765 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug fortran/50774] New: Internal Compiler Error when march=bdver1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50774 Bug #: 50774 Summary: Internal Compiler Error when march=bdver1 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug tree-optimization/10980] vararg functions are not inlined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10980 --- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-18 09:54:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > I bet it just ignores the attribute that is not how the attribute is > > supposed to work. > > > > We output error in thi

[Bug tree-optimization/50764] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2243 with -O2 -fsched2-use-superblocks -ftree-tail-merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50764 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/50763] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: missing PHI def with -ftree-tail-merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guen

[Bug middle-end/50724] cmath's floating-point classification implementations inconsistent with math.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724 --- Comment #34 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-18 10:03:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) > To be honest, this bug report is not under any discussion anymore. I tried to > get any sort of sanity, but in the end it's all about egos; you won't >

[Bug c/50773] float values are printed with greater precision than the float data type has when given as an argument to printf()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50773 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/44648] missing -Wunused warning on a const variable in if statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

[Bug c/50773] float values are printed with greater precision than the float data type has when given as an argument to printf()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50773 Andrew Haley changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aph at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c/50773] float values are printed with greater precision than the float data type has when given as an argument to printf()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50773 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/44648] missing -Wunused warning on a const variable in if statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-18 10:46:18 UTC --- On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648 > > Paolo Carlini changed: > >What|Remove

[Bug fortran/47023] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 --- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18 10:48:15 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Tue Oct 18 10:48:12 2011 New Revision: 180130 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180130 Log: 2011-10-18 Janus Weil PR fortran/

[Bug c++/44648] missing -Wunused warning on a const variable in if statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44648 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-

[Bug middle-end/50741] [4.7 Regression] remove_unused_locals causes seg fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50741 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/47023] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 --- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18 11:06:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > * treat BT_CLASS in decl.c (comment #1) Fixed with r180130. Left to do: > * the error in comment #0 could be downgraded to a warning (which o

[Bug target/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25520|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/50763] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: missing PHI def with -ftree-tail-merge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18 11:12:32 UTC --- Created attachment 25541 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25541 patch, handles case that either vuse1 or vuse2 is NULL_TREE in update_vuses. Currently test

[Bug tree-optimization/50672] [4.7 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50097] Private base class enumeration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50097 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/47346] access control for nested type is ignored in class template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47346 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wolfgang.roe...@gi-de.com --- Comment #9

[Bug objc/50743] [4.7 regression] objc-act.c triggers -Werror=sign-compare breaking bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50743 --- Comment #4 from Nicola Pero 2011-10-18 11:31:49 UTC --- Author: nicola Date: Tue Oct 18 11:31:45 2011 New Revision: 180132 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180132 Log: In gcc/objc/: 2011-10-18 Mikael Pettersson P

[Bug c++/45690] broken debuginfo with dwarf4?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45690 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |tromey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug objc/50743] [4.7 regression] objc-act.c triggers -Werror=sign-compare breaking bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50743 --- Comment #5 from Nicola Pero 2011-10-18 11:39:55 UTC --- Can you confirm that trunk is now OK ? Thanks

[Bug other/50775] New: Register allocator sets up frame and frame pointer with low register pressure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50775 Bug #: 50775 Summary: Register allocator sets up frame and frame pointer with low register pressure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: U

[Bug tree-optimization/50767] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1004 with -O2 -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dominator-opts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50767 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-18 11:44:22 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Oct 18 11:44:15 2011 New Revision: 180134 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180134 Log: 2011-10-18 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug target/50350] [4.6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in canonicalize_float_value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose 2011-10-18 11:44:57 UTC --- the proposed patch lets the build succeed

[Bug middle-end/50716] Segmentation fault caused by misaligned vector access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50716 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50767] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1004 with -O2 -fno-tree-copy-prop -fno-tree-dominator-opts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50767 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47023] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 --- Comment #19 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18 12:03:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) > > * reject proc-pointers for SIZEOF (comment #7) Example: use iso_c_binding procedure(real), pointer :: pp procedure(real) :: proc pp => sin pr

[Bug other/50775] Register allocator sets up frame and frame pointer with low register pressure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50775 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-10-18 12:07:28 UTC --- Created attachment 25542 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25542 in.c Source code from comment #c0 as attachment for conveniance.

[Bug fortran/47023] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 --- Comment #20 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18 12:17:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > > > * reject proc-pointers for SIZEOF (comment #7) I think one could also allow them, but then the implementation of SIZEOF needs to be fixed to

[Bug fortran/47023] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 --- Comment #21 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18 12:19:54 UTC --- The question is also how SIZEOF should act on data pointers: use iso_c_binding integer(2) :: i integer(2), pointer :: p print *,sizeof(i) print *,sizeof(p) end Output:

[Bug rtl-optimization/50205] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in code_motion_path_driver, at sel-sched.c:6581 with -fselective-scheduling2 and custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50205 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov 2011-10-18 12:36:20 UTC --- Author: amonakov Date: Tue Oct 18 12:36:16 2011 New Revision: 180135 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180135 Log: PR rtl-optimization/50205 * sel-sche

[Bug rtl-optimization/50205] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in code_motion_path_driver, at sel-sched.c:6581 with -fselective-scheduling2 and custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50205 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 Known to work|

[Bug fortran/47023] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 --- Comment #22 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-18 12:48:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #21) > The question is also how SIZEOF should act on data pointers: > Output: > 2 > 2 > Should it give the size of the poi

[Bug target/50737] FAIL: Throw_3 -O3 execution, generic dwarf2 EH problem?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50737 --- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18 12:55:12 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Tue Oct 18 12:55:06 2011 New Revision: 180137 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180137 Log: 2011-10-18 Uros Bizjak Eric Botc

[Bug libfortran/50016] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Drastic I/O performance regression on Windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 --- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-18 12:58:46 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Oct 18 12:58:42 2011 New Revision: 180138 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180138 Log: 2011-10-18 Tobias Burnus Janne Blo

[Bug bootstrap/50326] [4.7 regression] ICE in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:456

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #12

[Bug libfortran/50016] [4.7 Regression] Drastic I/O performance regression on Windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/50016] [4.7 Regression] Drastic I/O performance regression on Windows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50016 --- Comment #16 from xunxun 2011-10-18 13:20:27 UTC --- Good job. I will extract the patch to 4.6.1 release. ( I don't use gcc4.6 latest branch temporarily because PR 50664 ) Thanks.

[Bug middle-end/50754] [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_expr, at cfgexpand.c:3341

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50754 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/47023] C_Sizeof: Rejects valid code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023 --- Comment #23 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18 13:45:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) > > The question is also how SIZEOF should act on data pointers: > > Should it give the size of the pointer itself, or t

[Bug fortran/50552] type name cannot be statement function dummy argument (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50552 --- Comment #3 from Vittorio Zecca 2011-10-18 13:55:31 UTC --- I am traveling in Korea, and I cannot look at the standard now. If you believe this is a non-issue then please close it.

[Bug c++/50776] New: unused object optimized out, despite having constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50776 Bug #: 50776 Summary: unused object optimized out, despite having constructor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug tree-optimization/50769] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in phi_alternatives_equal, at tree-cfgcleanup.c:355 with -O2 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-pta

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50769 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/50776] unused object optimized out, despite having constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50776 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-18 14:18:49 UTC --- I can't reproduce this with any version. What platform are you using? (You failed to provide that, as requested by the http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ page)

[Bug target/50106] [ARM] Wrong code with -march=armv5t -mthumb -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50106 --- Comment #6 from Sebastian Huber 2011-10-18 14:19:55 UTC --- Created attachment 25543 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25543 arm-eabi-g++ -march=armv5t -mthumb -Os -S compiler1.test.ii -o compiler1.test.eabi.GCC-4.5.4.Os.s

[Bug target/50719] segmentation fault when attempting to build libav with gcc trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50719 --- Comment #3 from Sean McGovern 2011-10-18 14:25:20 UTC --- Have not been successful building trunk on i386-pc-solaris2.10 yet. Will answer these questions when I have a working build again.

[Bug c++/45690] broken debuginfo with dwarf4?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45690 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/50769] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in phi_alternatives_equal, at tree-cfgcleanup.c:355 with -O2 -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-pta

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50769 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-18 14:32:11 UTC --- Created attachment 25544 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25544 tentative patch This PR is similar to PR50672. We discover that blocks 6 and 7 are equal a

[Bug fortran/50420] [Coarray] lcobound doesn't accept coarray subcomponents

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50420 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-18 14:42:24 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Tue Oct 18 14:42:21 2011 New Revision: 180142 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180142 Log: PR fortran/50420 * trans-array.c (gfc_conv_

[Bug fortran/50420] [Coarray] lcobound doesn't accept coarray subcomponents

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50420 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-18 14:45:49 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Tue Oct 18 14:45:46 2011 New Revision: 180143 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180143 Log: PR fortran/50420 * trans-array.c (gfc_conv_

[Bug c/50773] float values are printed with greater precision than the float data type has when given as an argument to printf()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50773 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-10-18 14:49:28 UTC --- On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Needs -fexcess-precision=standard -m32 to trigger. libcpp does the > parsing of FP constants IIRC, and the C+

[Bug fortran/50420] [Coarray] lcobound doesn't accept coarray subcomponents

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50420 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-18 14:55:54 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Tue Oct 18 14:55:48 2011 New Revision: 180145 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180145 Log: PR fortran/50420 * trans-array.c (gfc_walk_

[Bug target/50106] [ARM] Wrong code with -march=armv5t -mthumb -Os

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50106 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassi

[Bug fortran/50420] [Coarray] lcobound doesn't accept coarray subcomponents

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50420 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-18 14:59:11 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Tue Oct 18 14:59:07 2011 New Revision: 180146 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180146 Log: PR fortran/50420 * trans-intrinsic.c (walk_

[Bug fortran/50420] [Coarray] lcobound doesn't accept coarray subcomponents

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50420 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-18 15:02:46 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Tue Oct 18 15:02:38 2011 New Revision: 180147 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180147 Log: PR fortran/50420 * trans-intrinsic.c (walk_

[Bug fortran/50420] [Coarray] lcobound doesn't accept coarray subcomponents

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50420 --- Comment #8 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-18 15:05:34 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Tue Oct 18 15:05:30 2011 New Revision: 180148 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180148 Log: PR fortran/50420 * check.c (dim_corank_chec

[Bug other/50759] [4.7 Regression] @table ended by @end quotation at line 595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50759 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/44236] Output initializers in .text.init section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44236 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/50420] [Coarray] lcobound doesn't accept coarray subcomponents

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50420 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-18 15:11:27 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Tue Oct 18 15:11:21 2011 New Revision: 180150 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180150 Log: PR fortran/50420 * simplify.c (simplify_cob

[Bug c/21659] [4.4/4.5 Regression] [unit-at-a-time] "weak declaration must precede definition" error missing at >= O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21659 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/50420] [Coarray] lcobound doesn't accept coarray subcomponents

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50420 --- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-18 15:13:58 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Tue Oct 18 15:13:45 2011 New Revision: 180151 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180151 Log: PR fortran/50420 * trans-types.c (gfc_buil

[Bug bootstrap/50777] New: [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails on Solaris 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50777 Bug #: 50777 Summary: [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails on Solaris 10 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Prio

[Bug fortran/50420] [Coarray] lcobound doesn't accept coarray subcomponents

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50420 --- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-18 15:17:34 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Tue Oct 18 15:17:29 2011 New Revision: 180152 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180152 Log: PR fortran/50420 * trans.c (gfc_build_arra

[Bug target/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #44 from Eric Botcazou 2011-10-18 15:22:14 UTC --- > Created attachment 25540 [details] > demonstration of the fault using c++/vendor's tools > > after Eric solved my inverted-logic thinko ... > .. I reproduced using g++-4.2 > bug f

[Bug fortran/50420] [Coarray] lcobound doesn't accept coarray subcomponents

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50420 --- Comment #12 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-18 15:23:10 UTC --- Author: mikael Date: Tue Oct 18 15:23:04 2011 New Revision: 180153 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180153 Log: PR fortran/50420 * gfortran.dg/coarray_sub

[Bug bootstrap/50777] [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails on Solaris 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50777 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-18 15:26:08 UTC --- My guess would not be a missing header, but missing feature test macro

[Bug target/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #45 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-18 15:32:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #44) > > I think we'll need to apply the patch in the short/medium term and then > > figure > > out how to control it - which will depend on which system(s) a fix

[Bug tree-optimization/50735] [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/vector-2.c:52:1: ICE: verify_ssa failed at -O1 and above

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50735 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-10-18 15:33:16 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Oct 18 15:33:12 2011 New Revision: 180154 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180154 Log: PR tree-optimization/50735 * function.c (gi

[Bug fortran/50420] [Coarray] lcobound doesn't accept coarray subcomponents

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50420 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/50686] [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686 --- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-18 15:37:49 UTC --- > --- Comment #16 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-10-17 > 17:37:11 UTC --- > Sorry, I was being imprecise - only the instances where we generate notes 374 > and 375 are

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/50776] unused object optimized out, despite having constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50776 Nadav Har'El changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-18 16:08:02 UTC --- Note however that the bug I closed as duplicate of this one shows that in some cases the problem manifests itself as *bogus* warning.. But I'm pretty sure the issue ultimately is one

[Bug middle-end/48087] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] -Wall -Werror adds warnings over and above those generated by -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48087 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-18 16:02:26 UTC --- Thanks Manuel: if I understand correctly, this way we could not only avoid the regression but even do better than 4.4, and again, the fix could be very simple (is only hiding itself ve

[Bug bootstrap/50777] [4.7 regression] bootstrap fails on Solaris 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50777 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #46 from Eric Botcazou 2011-10-18 16:03:20 UTC --- > that seems reasonable if the result can be cached - otherwise it's potentially > a big hit. We don't really care about performances here: a signal has been raised and we're about t

[Bug target/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 --- Comment #47 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-18 16:22:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #46) > > that seems reasonable if the result can be cached - otherwise it's > > potentially > > a big hit. > > We don't really care about performances here: a sig

[Bug fortran/47485] gfortran -M output is incorrect when -MT option is used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47485 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nightstrike at gmail dot

  1   2   >