http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
--- Comment #47 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-18 16:22:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #46) > > that seems reasonable if the result can be cached - otherwise it's > > potentially > > a big hit. > > We don't really care about performances here: a signal has been raised and > we're about to throw a DWARF exception, so everything is already quite > costly. > But saving the result in a static variable should indeed be possible. OK, that's fair... mine for now (will try and cook sth up).
