http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50421
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50415
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50426
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenthe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50437
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50452
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50475
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50528
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49319
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-10 14:26:46 UTC ---
> --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-10
> 11:50:37 UTC ---
> Does it still happen?
Just, just had it in this weekend's bootstrap (r179656).
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50195
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-10
14:25:43 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 10 14:25:34 2011
New Revision: 179752
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179752
Log:
2011-10-10 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49317
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6 regression]|[4.6/4.7 regression]
|g++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50685
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936
Sandra Loosemore changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2011-10-10
14:33:17 UTC ---
The bug was introduced in revision 177218:
2011-08-02 Richard Henderson
PR target/49864
* reg-notes.def (REG_ARGS_SIZE): New.
* calls.c (emit_call_1):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50475
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Bug #: 50686
Summary: [4.7 regression] IRIX 6.5 bootstrap failure: ICE in in
lookup_cfa_1, at dwarf2cfi.c:595
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50685
--- Comment #3 from Barry Matheney 2011-10-10
15:07:23 UTC ---
oslevel -s
5300-11-05-1036
aix 5.3 TL 11 and sp = 5 1036
Is there some specific level that it needs to be brought up to that will
correct the issue?
(In reply to comment #2)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50685
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50568
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50579
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50601
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50608
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50614
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-10
15:20:07 UTC ---
Probably.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50607
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50615
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50618
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50622
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50628
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50640
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50658
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50667
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50682
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50665
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50389
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-10
15:45:58 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 10 15:45:53 2011
New Revision: 179757
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179757
Log:
2011-10-10 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50389
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50195
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50687
Bug #: 50687
Summary: Missing symbols with -flto -fvisibility=hidden on
4.6.x but not on 4.7.0
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50195
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-10-10 16:25:15 UTC
---
> The folding is guarded with optimize_function_for_speed_p (), but that always
> returns true for -O0 ...
>
> Honza, should the _for_speed_p () functions in predict.c be optimize && ..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47256
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-10
16:31:45 UTC ---
Patches go to gcc-patches...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50665
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson 2011-10-10
16:51:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Git bisect points to Rev179701:
...
> Rename vshuffle/vec_shuffle to vec_perm.
>
> * doc/extend.texi (__builtin_shuffle): Improve the de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50665
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-10 17:04:46 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Oct 10 17:04:41 2011
New Revision: 179763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179763
Log:
PR bootstrap/50665
* optabs.h (DOI_v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50665
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33109
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50279
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2011-10-10
18:03:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I've attached a reduced testcase that reproduces the ICE with the commandline
> g++ -nostdlib -flto -g test.i
This test case doesn't trigger the ICE on x86_6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46980
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-10-10 18:09:11 UTC ---
Ugh, this uses pch. I can't compile the preprocessed source without
this file:
"/tmp/opencv-2.1.0/obj-hppa-linux-gnu/src/cvaux/_cvaux.h.gch/
cvaux_Release.gch"
I'll tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50665
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50688
Bug #: 50688
Summary: OpenMP: Strange interaction with BLOCK
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Seve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564
--- Comment #9 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de
2011-10-10 18:57:09 UTC ---
> implicit none
> integer :: i
> real :: A(5), B(5)
> B(1) = 3.344
> A = [real :: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ]
> !$omp parallel default(shared)
> !$omp workshare
> A(:) = A(:)*cos(B(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50685
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn 2011-10-10 19:00:22
UTC ---
AIX 5.3 TL10 (as well as AIX 6.1 TL05 and AIX 7.1 TL00) instroduced AIX
assembler changes with some bugs. An AIX iFix for AIX 5.3 is available (APAR
IZ98385 for AIX 5.3 TL10, APAR IZ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49818
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-10-10
19:03:43 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Mon Oct 10 19:03:39 2011
New Revision: 179769
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179769
Log:
2011-10-10 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/49
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50689
Bug #: 50689
Summary: AIX bootstrap failure from cgraphunit.c aliases change
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49818
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50689
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn 2011-10-10 19:08:13
UTC ---
Created attachment 25456
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25456
Assembler output of miscompiled file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50689
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn 2011-10-10 19:07:43
UTC ---
Created attachment 25455
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25455
Assembler output of correctly compiled files
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig 2011-10-10
19:07:38 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Oct 10 19:07:35 2011
New Revision: 179770
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179770
Log:
2011-10-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/5056
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50690
Bug #: 50690
Summary: ICE with front end optimization and OMP workshare
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50689
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50690
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691
Bug #: 50691
Summary: Incorrect argument evaluation in call with __thread
argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-10
19:34:06 UTC ---
On powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0, c52103x, c52104x, and c52104y fail with a
different error:
raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow detected
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-10-10
19:34:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 25457
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25457
Preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-10
19:58:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Ping? It would be nice to have this patch in 4.7 ...
I cannot officially submit it until Cavium's assignment has been fully
submitted.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
--- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-10 20:04:41
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
No acats regressions on i686-darwin9 (at 179745).
> On powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0, c52103x, c52104x, and c52104y fail with a
> different error:
>
> raised STOR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2011-10-10
20:08:01 UTC ---
Compile command:
gcc -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME=1
-DHAVE_LOCALE_H=1 -DHAVE_WCHAR_H=1 -DHAVE_STDARG=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1
-DHAVE_ALLOCA_H=1 -DHAVE_S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-10
20:11:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > On powerpc-apple-darwin9.8.0, c52103x, c52104x, and c52104y fail with a
> > different error:
> >
> > raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow detecte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50683
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-10
20:15:24 UTC ---
Most likely related to bug 50691.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-10 20:14:53 UTC ---
Created attachment 25458
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25458
tentative patch
Currently testing attached patch on x86_64.
2011-10-10 Tom de Vries
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50691
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2011-10-10
20:16:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 25459
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25459
Simplified testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50692
Bug #: 50692
Summary: option -finstrument-functions causes ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49675
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||longb at cray dot com
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50692
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50279
--- Comment #9 from Peter Foley 2011-10-10
20:34:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > I've attached a reduced testcase that reproduces the ICE with the
> > commandline
> > g++ -nostdlib -flto -g test.i
>
> This tes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665
--- Comment #8 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-10
20:34:26 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Mon Oct 10 20:34:20 2011
New Revision: 179772
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179772
Log:
PR c++/48665
* cp-demangle.c (d_cv_q
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189
--- Comment #7 from Paul Koning 2011-10-10
20:41:35 UTC ---
Re comment 5, does "works by luck" mean that I should not look in trunk for a
fix to backport because nothing was actually fixed?
Should I just avoid all versions of GCC newer than 4.4?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50663
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-10-10 20:48:40 UTC ---
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204
>
> --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-10
> 19:58:32 UT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-10
20:51:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Do you mind if I take over the patch?
No I don't mind at all.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50688
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|rejects-valid |diagnostic, openmp
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27692
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-10-10 21:18:32 UTC ---
On 9-Oct-11, at 12:00 PM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
> Not sure to understand which is the current status of this. Should
> it be simply
> *skipped* instead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-10
21:37:40 UTC ---
Time to make serious progress on the rest ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46980
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2011-10-10
21:40:53 UTC ---
This is just a guess, but I suspect the problem is opencv is using
precompiled headers. Note that pch is disabled for libstdcxx.
I tried to fix the libstdcxx pch bug, but it was a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27692
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669
--- Comment #4 from Jon Grant 2011-10-10 22:41:22 UTC ---
Ok. That makes sense. I confirmed by modifying the test, and having "static int
unused_int;" which gives a warning that it is unused at global scope.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693
Bug #: 50693
Summary: Slightly different loop body leads to 5.5x slower
performance
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693
--- Comment #1 from Alex Gaynor 2011-10-10
22:52:07 UTC ---
It may be interesting to note that clang (version 2.9) does not exhibit this
performance difference, but versions execute quickly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50693
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-10
22:55:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It may be interesting to note that clang (version 2.9) does not exhibit this
> performance difference, but versions execute quickly.
Yes that really true be
101 - 200 of 218 matches
Mail list logo