http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27692
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-10-10
21:45:19 UTC ---
I honestly don't understand how such a warning would look like: like warning
for any snippet of code where destructors could run in an unpredictable order?
I'm adding Jason in CC in case he can imagine something in this area...
otherwise I guess I would ask you or Steve to just change those testcases to be
skipped instead of xfailed and be done with this very old PR.
