[Bug target/50652] [avr] Incorrect data start value for atmega164a

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50652 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-10-10 08:32:26 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Oct 10 08:32:15 2011 New Revision: 179737 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179737 Log: PR target/50652 * config/avr/avr-mcus.def

[Bug target/50652] [avr] Incorrect data start value for atmega164a

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50652 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-10-10 08:37:31 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon Oct 10 08:37:22 2011 New Revision: 179738 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179738 Log: PR target/50652 Backport from Mainline r17

[Bug target/50652] [avr] Incorrect data start value for atmega164a

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50652 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug fortran/43829] Scalarization of reductions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 --- Comment #47 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-10-10 09:05:29 UTC --- On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 > > --- Comment #43 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-08 > 17:57:43 UTC

[Bug fortran/50564] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-10 09:23:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Could you supply a complete test case? I'd like to check this out, but# > I don't use OpenMP myself. Well, something along the following lines. Except for

[Bug tree-optimization/50672] [4.7 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|c++

[Bug rtl-optimization/49912] [4.7 Regression] ICE from -freorder-blocks-and-partition : verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49912 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org | Component|c++

[Bug tree-optimization/50680] -ftree-vectorizer-verbose does not report about "basic block SLP" (attempt of) vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50680 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|trivial

[Bug c++/39043] C++ compiler doesn't optimize inlined function call for PIE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39043 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/50682] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in main_block_label with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions -ftracer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50682 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug target/50683] GCC fails to build MPFR 3.1.0 on sparc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50683 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 --- Comment #10 from Martin Steghöfer 2011-10-10 09:43:30 UTC --- Do you want me to commit a new bug report for my issue then or are you going to fix both issues using this one (although they need separate fixes)?

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/50672] [4.7 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |tom at codesourcery dot com --- Commen

[Bug tree-optimization/48764] [4.5 Regression] wrong-code bug in gcc-4.5.x, related to __restrict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48764 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.2, 4.7.0 Summary|[4.5/4

[Bug tree-optimization/50658] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in tree-flow-inline.h:562

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50658 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/50608] [4.6/4.7 Regression] cannot apply 'offsetof' to a non constant address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50608 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2

[Bug middle-end/50629] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vect-shuffle-2.c with ICE on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50629 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug fortran/50659] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] [F03] ICE with PROCEDURE statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50659 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/43052] [4.7 Regression] Inline memcmp is *much* slower than glibc's, no longer expanded inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/50193] ARM: ICE on a | (b << negative-constant)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50193 Andrew Stubbs changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/48150] [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/guality/sra-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48150 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/48193] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: type mismatch between an SSA_NAME and its symbol with -flto --param partial-inlining-entry-probability=101

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48193 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/50629] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vect-shuffle-2.c with ICE on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50629 Artem Shinkarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tema at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/48440] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/labels-3.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48440 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/48660] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ARM ICE in expand_expr_real_1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Version|unknown

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-10 11:45:30 UTC --- Martin, > Do you want me to commit a new bug report for my issue yes, I think that would be a good idea. Thanks, Janus

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-10 11:48:03 UTC --- Actually, it was with Jonathan in PR49152. One of this is a duplicate of the other.

[Bug target/48949] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc-4.6.0 regression with complex.h on i386-pc-solaris2.10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48949 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code |build Priority|P3

[Bug debug/48853] [4.7 Regression] Wrong DWARF codegen when Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49319] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/abi/thunk5.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49319 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from Richard Gu

[Bug rtl-optimization/49357] register allocation worse

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49357 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/49662] [4.7 Regression] XFAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-XX.c, PRE confuses loop interchange

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49662 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-10 11:53:57 UTC --- I don't understand: this number should not be printed at all?!?

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-10 11:55:15 UTC --- I'm really confused, I don't understand what we are going to print in 4.7.0 for this error message.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49710] [4.7 Regression] segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49710 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenthe

[Bug middle-end/49806] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp47.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49806 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50285 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/49826] [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with attribute stdcall and -mrtd

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-10 11:59:41 UTC --- Patches should be posted to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org with a ChangeLog entry and a note how it was tested.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49912] [4.7 Regression] ICE from -freorder-blocks-and-partition : verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49912 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug debug/49951] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Debug stepping behavior regarding g++ Class destructor has changed for the worse starting at gcc 4.5.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49951 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug middle-end/49945] [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c FAILs with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49945 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/50638] [4.7 Regression] emulated TLS fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638 --- Comment #12 from Michael Matz 2011-10-10 11:59:33 UTC --- Author: matz Date: Mon Oct 10 11:59:29 2011 New Revision: 179745 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179745 Log: PR middle-end/50638 * tree-emutls.c

[Bug c++/49855] [4.6/4.7 Regression] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_const_int_from_real

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49855 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 --- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-10 12:08:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > I'm really confused, I don't understand what we are going to print in 4.7.0 > for > this error message. Nothing changed as far as I know, but the sug

[Bug tree-optimization/49997] [4.7 Regression] ICE in inline_small_functions with -fnon-call-exceptions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49997 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/49936] [4.7 Regression] IRA handles CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS poorly, + spills to memory on 4.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mipsisa32r2-elf Status|UNC

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug java/50045] [4.7 regression] ICE in gcc/java/lang.c:427 with -ftree-dump-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 --- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-10 12:12:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > I'm really confused, I don't understand what we are going to print in 4.7.0 > > for > > this error message. > > Nothing

[Bug ada/49944] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu fails with "s-taprop.adb:856:10: "pthread_attr_setaffinity_np" is undefined (more references follow)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49944 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/50012] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] C++ front end misses -Wsign-compare warnings when extraneous parentheses are present

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50012 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/49719] [4.7 Regression] test gcc.target/arm/sibcall-1.c fails for ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49719 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/49740] [4.7 Regression] powerpc native bootstrap with -O3 produces "Bootstrap comparison failure!"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49740 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target|powerpc-*-*

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natObject.cc:58

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50285 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-10 12:15:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I don't get why this is WAITING Really? The OP never provided any source that demonstrates the "bug" so I couldn't be sure if my guess was right or if th

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-10 12:14:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > I don't think you can get the number right in general, since the original > representation is gone after the tokens are converted into the internal > repres

[Bug rtl-optimization/49452] [4.7 regression] comp-goto-2.c regresses in testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/50195] [4.7 Regression] Linking time error with -fast-math -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50195 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|paolo.carlini at oracle dot |unassigned at gcc dot |

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-10 12:28:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Ok, call.c:op_error must be completely changed. Too much work for me at the > moment. I think if you agree it is the same issue, at least we could c

[Bug rtl-optimization/50205] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in code_motion_path_driver, at sel-sched.c:6581 with -fselective-scheduling2 and custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50205 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/50204] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed fully redundant load found in crafty (SPEC 2k)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50204 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-10 12:28:19 UTC --- Ping? It would be nice to have this patch in 4.7 ...

[Bug middle-end/50210] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in create_linear_expr_from_tree, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:1137 with fgraphite-identity -ffast-math -fno-tree-scev-cprop -fstrict-overflow

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50210 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/50232] [4.7 Regression] reorg.c:3971: undefined reference to `make_return_insns'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50232 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/50283] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/eh/simd-1.C execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||EH Priority|P3

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 --- Comment #14 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-10 12:33:31 UTC --- Frankly, I'm not convinced that before fixing the *whole* PR49152 we couldn't manage to find a way to print floating point constants in a more decent way. Maybe not easy, but not impo

[Bug rtl-optimization/50290] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in distribute_notes, at combine.c:13282 with -O2 -fwhole-program -fno-tree-loop-optimize -fno-tree-vrp -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50290 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/50325] [4.7 Regression] 76 new fails with rev. 177691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/50340] [4.7 Regression] Fails to build SPEC 2000 176.gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50340 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenthe

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 --- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-10 12:37:09 UTC --- For example, as a user of the compiler, seeing 6 digits everywhere would not surprise me at all, together with a correct column number, I would certainly consider the output good enou

[Bug tree-optimization/50557] [4.7 Regression] Register pressure increase after reassociation (x86, 32 bits)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50557 --- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2011-10-10 12:40:01 UTC --- I don't have anything too helpful to add. This code as it stands is balanced on a knife's edge for register usage for the particular target, so it's always going to be sensitive

[Bug tree-optimization/46985] [4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in is_gimple_min_invariant (gimple.c:2742) with -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46985 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.4.7

[Bug target/47333] [4.6 regression] g++.dg/lto/20091219 FAILs on Solaris 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #18 from Richard Guent

[Bug middle-end/47903] [4.5 Regression] var-tracking.c: valgrind error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47903 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.5.4

[Bug debug/47780] [4.5 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure with -O -fgcse -fgcse-las -fstack-protector-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47780 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.5.4

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 --- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-10 12:44:42 UTC --- Harcoding 6 in pp_c_floating_constant leads to: 33067.C:2:18: error: no match for ‘operator<’ in ‘1.1e+0 < t’

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 --- Comment #17 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-10-10 12:45:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > Frankly, I'm not convinced that before fixing the *whole* PR49152 we couldn't > manage to find a way to print floating point constants in a more dece

[Bug bootstrap/50665] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50665 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug middle-end/50638] [4.7 Regression] emulated TLS fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50638 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 --- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-10 12:54:54 UTC --- Sorry, I'm an engineer (in this context). For me the issue is only the following: if I were a user of 4.7.0, I would rather prefer seeing: 33067.C:2:18: error: no match for ‘operator

[Bug c++/33067] Awkward long decimal expansion for double literal in error.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33067 --- Comment #19 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-10 12:56:47 UTC --- Patch posted here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg00754.html

[Bug middle-end/50598] [4.7 Regression] Undefined symbols: "___emutls_v.*", ... on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at CeBiTec dot

[Bug tree-optimization/50635] ICE on valid: segfault in vectorize_loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50635 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/50195] [4.7 Regression] Linking time error with -fast-math -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50195 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug fortran/50684] New: Incorrect error for move_alloc on intent(in) pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50684 Bug #: 50684 Summary: Incorrect error for move_alloc on intent(in) pointer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 --- Comment #12 from Martin Steghöfer 2011-10-10 13:24:24 UTC --- OK, created bug 50684.

[Bug c++/48665] type of const member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot | |com

[Bug middle-end/49801] df_live_verify_transfer_functions fails with to use of CC_REGNUM and checking enabled in rx backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49801 --- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton 2011-10-10 13:31:10 UTC --- Author: nickc Date: Mon Oct 10 13:31:03 2011 New Revision: 179749 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179749 Log: PR middle-end/49801 * compare-elim.c (find_c

[Bug c++/48665] type of const member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/50354] [4.7 regression] sparc64-linux gcc generates assembly code that gas rejects, breaking bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50354 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Priority|P3

[Bug middle-end/49801] df_live_verify_transfer_functions fails with to use of CC_REGNUM and checking enabled in rx backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49801 --- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton 2011-10-10 13:33:45 UTC --- Hi Paulo, This should be fixed now. Cheers Nick

[Bug c++/50685] New: Compiler segmentation fault on AIX when constructors and destructors are implemented in the implementation file (non-inline).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50685 Bug #: 50685 Summary: Compiler segmentation fault on AIX when constructors and destructors are implemented in the implementation file (non-inline). Classification: Unclassified

[Bug debug/47510] DW_TAG_typedef can have children when designating a naming typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47510 dbeichl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel_beichl at gmx dot |

[Bug c++/50685] Compiler segmentation fault on AIX when constructors and destructors are implemented in the implementation file (non-inline).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50685 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug tree-optimization/50389] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1730 with -O -freorder-blocks -ftracer and __builtin___memcpy_chk()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50389 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50410] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in record_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

  1   2   3   >