http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829
--- Comment #47 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-10-10 09:05:29 UTC --- On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, mikael at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 > > --- Comment #43 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-08 > 17:57:43 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #39) > > Thanks. One comment: I think you will increase the binary size by inlining > > the > > reduction. Could you consider keeping the current libgfortran version and > > protecting the scalarization by > > if (!optimize_size) > > > This is included in the patch in comment #41. Unfortunately, it makes the test > (comment #42) fail with -Os in the testsuite. I don't know yet how I will > handle it. I would like to avoid forcing one optimization level if possible. > Any idea? /* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-Os" } { "" } } */
