[Bug c++/50671] New: NSDMI not parsed correctly for multiple-data-member declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50671 Bug #: 50671 Summary: NSDMI not parsed correctly for multiple-data-member declarations Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/50622] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed for std::complex

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50622 vincenzo Innocente changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker --- Comment #4 from vincenzo

[Bug c++/50671] [C++0x] NSDMI not parsed correctly for multiple-data-member declarations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50671 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50563] [C++0x] Weird syntax acceptance rules for non-static data members initialized in place

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50563 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miles at gnu dot org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug target/50603] [x32] Unnecessary lea

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50603 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x32 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/43829] Scalarization of reductions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 --- Comment #44 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com 2011-10-09 09:48:00 UTC --- Dear Mikael, I have duly loaded up your patch - it looks very slick and professional; it even works as intended! >> > This is included in the patch in comment

[Bug c++/50672] New: ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 Bug #: 50672 Summary: ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/50660] warning about pass NULL to non pointer argument happens twice for template function call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50660 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug libobjc/49883] clang + gcc 4.6 runtime = broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49883 --- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011-10-09 10:29:54 UTC --- Author: nicola Date: Sun Oct 9 10:29:50 2011 New Revision: 179721 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179721 Log: In libobjc/: 2011-10-09 Nicola Pero PR libob

[Bug libobjc/49883] clang + gcc 4.6 runtime = broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49883 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50660] warning about pass NULL to non pointer argument happens twice

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50660 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|warning about pass NULL to |warning about pass NULL to

[Bug libobjc/50003] -[Protocol respondsTo:] does not work with Clang

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50003 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libobjc/50368] Implicit, precision losing cast in objc/objc-api.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50368 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libfortran/50673] New: very slow I/O with trailing spaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50673 Bug #: 50673 Summary: very slow I/O with trailing spaces Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50659] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] [F03] ICE with PROCEDURE statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50659 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-09 11:34:25 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Sun Oct 9 11:34:21 2011 New Revision: 179723 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179723 Log: 2011-10-09 Janus Weil PR fortran/

[Bug c/50669] no warning for unused globals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/50666] bad error reporting for TMPDIR full

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50666 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/50665] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50665 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/50667] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/vshuf-* on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50667 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guen

[Bug bootstrap/50674] New: [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken: corrupted profile info: sum_all is smaller than sum_max

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674 Bug #: 50674 Summary: [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken: corrupted profile info: sum_all is smaller than sum_max Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug libfortran/50673] very slow I/O with trailing spaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50673 --- Comment #1 from Joost VandeVondele 2011-10-09 12:04:55 UTC --- Actually, since eating the trailing spaces is the issue (seems to be implemented very generally in libfortran), the following is a practical workaround in this case: read(line(1:

[Bug c/50675] New: master and single OpenMP constructs broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50675 Bug #: 50675 Summary: master and single OpenMP constructs broken Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/50672] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48665] type of const member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug tree-optimization/50622] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed for std::complex

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50622 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-09 12:42:38 UTC --- Thanks Vincenzo. Doesn't happen for __complex__ float, doesn't happen for < 4 components, thus seems related to the size of the struct.

[Bug lto/50676] New: Partitioning may fail with presence of static variables referring to function labels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50676 Bug #: 50676 Summary: Partitioning may fail with presence of static variables referring to function labels Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 St

[Bug rtl-optimization/50677] New: volatile forces load into register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677 Bug #: 50677 Summary: volatile forces load into register Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug ada/50678] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Bug #: 50678 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug lto/50676] Partitioning may fail with presence of static variables referring to function labels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50676 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug lto/50676] Partitioning may fail with presence of static variables referring to function labels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50676 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-10-09 13:17:58 UTC --- > Have a look at PR50620. I can provide 30 different testcases > for this issue ;-). Those are different problems (i.e. not involving labels with address taken). I will look into that no

[Bug lto/50620] "undefined reference" errors / csmith lto testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50620 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug bootstrap/50674] [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken: corrupted profile info: sum_all is smaller than sum_max

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 Wolfgang Bangerth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/15272] lookup, dependent base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15272 Wolfgang Bangerth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/6936] member "using" binds wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6936 Wolfgang Bangerth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/50675] master and single OpenMP constructs broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50675 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/50675] master and single OpenMP constructs broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50675 --- Comment #2 from markflorisson88 2011-10-09 13:46:27 UTC --- Indeed, you are right. My apologies, I should teach myself to use default(none).

[Bug c++/11814] Code with missing "template" keyword wrongly accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11814 Wolfgang Bangerth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug lto/50679] New: Linux kernel LTO tracking bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50679 Bug #: 50679 Summary: Linux kernel LTO tracking bug Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/10291] error referencing a static local from a local struct in template code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10291 Wolfgang Bangerth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/6936] member "using" binds wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6936 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-09-03 21:39:27 |2011-10-09 21:39:27 Known

[Bug c++/10852] Old for-scoping rules improperly used?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10852 Wolfgang Bangerth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/11814] Code with missing "template" keyword wrongly accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11814 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-09 14:01:26 UTC --- and 4.7.0

[Bug lto/50679] Linux kernel LTO tracking bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50679 ak at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug lto/50620] "undefined reference" errors / csmith lto testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50620 Andi Kleen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot

[Bug c++/42768] ICE: libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/vec.cc:354

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42768 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/43566] Debug information removed on last bracket of function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43566 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/44650] internal compiler error: in ei_container, at basic-block.h:687

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44650 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/49912] [4.7 Regression] ICE from -freorder-blocks-and-partition : verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49912 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50672] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 --- Comment #2 from dcb 2011-10-09 14:55:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Can you try to reduce the testcase somewhat, maybe helping yourself with > 'delta'? http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction I tried for an hour or so to

[Bug c++/49525] [4.4] wrong code and wrong warning for bitfield related operations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49525 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/46727] [4.4 Regression] ICE with -O3 and -ffast-math (in get_callee_fndecl, at tree.c:6857)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46727 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|spamverdacht

[Bug c++/50672] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-09 15:04:34 UTC --- I already felt free, I asked because without a manageable testcase it gonna take more time, be warned.

[Bug tree-optimization/50635] ICE on valid: segfault in vectorize_loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50635 --- Comment #4 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-09 15:09:04 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sun Oct 9 15:09:00 2011 New Revision: 179724 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179724 Log: PR tree-optimization/50635

[Bug c++/43922] internal compiler error: in copy_body_r, at tree-inline.c:748 when compiling with -fopenmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43922 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug objc++/48394] ObjC exceptions cannot be caught in ObjC++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48394 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org Compon

[Bug c++/49976] Cross (Linux->AIX) GCC crashes with Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49976 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org Severity

[Bug c++/49896] undefined reference to static const integral member whose address is not used, for some values of the constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug c++/48686] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2103 with -ftree-vectorize and -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48686 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/50672] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug c++/50672] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2011-10-09 15:31:43 UTC --- Created attachment 25449 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25449 reduced testcase Copy & paste didn't work. Here is an attachment.

[Bug c++/50672] [4.7 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenther at suse dot de Summa

[Bug c++/50672] [4.7 Regression] ice: verify_ssa failed: no immediate_use list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug c++/32614] -fmessage-length documentation and implementation disagree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32614 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug c++/27692] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.other/init5.C execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27692 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-

[Bug fortran/50564] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-09 16:00:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > So, the best method is to disable front-end optimization within > a forall loop. > > I assume the same holds for DO CONCURRENT. I think do concurrent is OK

[Bug fortran/43829] Scalarization of reductions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 --- Comment #45 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-09 16:01:27 UTC --- > Thanks. One comment: I think you will increase the binary size by inlining the > reduction. Could you consider keeping the current libgfortran version and > protecting the sc

[Bug c++/43913] error: ‘’ is not a valid template argument for type ‘int’ because it is a non-constant expression

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43913 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug preprocessor/46444] termination of preprocessing by cpp when no include file is found

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46444 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org Compon

[Bug fortran/50564] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-09 16:14:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > one has a problem as "tmp" is shared. Thus, one needs to make sure that all > inserted temporary variables are thread private (DECL_THREAD_LOCAL_P). Actuall

[Bug tree-optimization/50680] New: -ftree-vectorizer-verbose does not report about "basic block SLP" (attempt of) vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50680 Bug #: 50680 Summary: -ftree-vectorizer-verbose does not report about "basic block SLP" (attempt of) vectorization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug c++/39164] [C++0x] defaulted dtor redefinition not caught

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39164 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|jason at gcc

[Bug c++/39043] C++ compiler doesn't optimize inlined function call for PIE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39043 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org | --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-

[Bug c/50669] no warning for unused globals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669 --- Comment #2 from Jon Grant 2011-10-09 16:44:18 UTC --- I could understand this for libraries. However, when linking as an executable binary, could the global really be still exported?

[Bug fortran/43829] Scalarization of reductions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829 --- Comment #46 from Mikael Morin 2011-10-09 16:44:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #45) > Are these numbers misleading, or once again compiling for size does not give > the smallest size? Well, to begin with, I don't think the test is close to a

[Bug lto/50679] Linux kernel LTO tracking bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50679 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug bootstrap/50674] [4.7 Regression] profiledbootstrap broken: corrupted profile info: sum_all is smaller than sum_max

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50674 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/50677] volatile forces load into register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/38172] warn_unused_result does not work with structs not containing a copy constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38172 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug fortran/50564] [4.7 Regression] Front-end optimization - ICE with FORALL

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 --- Comment #7 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2011-10-09 18:10:37 UTC --- Am 09.10.2011 18:14, schrieb burnus at gcc dot gnu.org: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50564 > > --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-09 > 16:14:43

[Bug fortran/50627] Error recovery: ICE in gfc_free_namespace after diagnosing missing end of construct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50627 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Sum

[Bug c++/50681] New: A constexpr identifier in a header file generates undefined symbols in object code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50681 Bug #: 50681 Summary: A constexpr identifier in a header file generates undefined symbols in object code. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Sta

[Bug c++/50681] A constexpr identifier in a header file generates undefined symbols in object code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50681 Feto changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://ideone.com/kfs6n CC|

[Bug c++/50681] [C++0x] A constexpr identifier in a header file generates undefined symbols in object code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50681 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50682] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in main_block_label with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions -ftracer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50682 Bug #: 50682 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in main_block_label with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions -ftracer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug fortran/50627] Error recovery: ICE in gfc_free_namespace after diagnosing missing end of construct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50627 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug c++/31147] increased size of debug information

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31147 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/33758] g++: Internal error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33758 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c/50669] no warning for unused globals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50669 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-09 19:34:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I could understand this for libraries. However, when linking as an executable > binary, could the global really be still exported? Yes. In fact this is how

[Bug fortran/45044] Different named COMMON block size: No warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45044 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-09 19:37:52 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sun Oct 9 19:37:47 2011 New Revision: 179729 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179729 Log: 2011-10-09 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/45

[Bug rtl-optimization/50677] volatile forces load into register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50677 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-09 19:48:39 UTC --- This is a dup of an older bug too though I cannot find it right now. Also it is related to bug 49807.

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-09 20:39:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > How about this? Looks as if should work (for comment 0). (I think the test case in comment 2 is a completely different issue, which needs a separate fix.)

[Bug rtl-optimization/34791] [avr] optimisation of 8-bit logic sometimes fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34791 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target|avr-*-* |avr Status|NEW

[Bug target/34789] [avr] sometimes the compiler keeps addresses in registers unnecessarily

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34789 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target|avr-*-* |avr Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/34792] [avr] c++ worse than c compiler at 8-bit optimisations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34792 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target|avr-*-* |avr Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/50678] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: c52104y on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot |

[Bug c++/49896] undefined reference to static const integral member whose address is not used, for some values of the constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49896 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug fortran/50570] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect error for assignment to intent(in) pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50570 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-09 23:08:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > How about this? > > > > Looks as if should work (for comment 0). > > It does. I'll check for regressions. Unfortun

  1   2   >