[Bug tree-optimization/50412] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast ICE in vect_do_peeling_for_loop_bound

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50412 --- Comment #4 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 09:04:24 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sun Sep 25 09:04:19 2011 New Revision: 179160 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179160 Log: PR tree-optimization/50412

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 --- Comment #15 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 09:26:03 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Sun Sep 25 09:25:59 2011 New Revision: 179162 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179162 Log: PR tree-optimization/50413

[Bug tree-optimization/50412] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast ICE in vect_do_peeling_for_loop_bound

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50412 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50363] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50363 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48108] lto should be containerized in a single mach-o section on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24958|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug lto/50383] ICE in lto_symtab_register_decl, at lto-symtab.c:148

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC|rguenther at suse dot de|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/50415] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50415 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/50414] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in store_constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50414 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug fortran/50416] gfortran -O1 ICE MPFR assertion failed: 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50416 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/50426] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -O1 ICE in estimate_function_body_sizes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50426 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug lto/50383] ICE in lto_symtab_register_decl, at lto-symtab.c:148

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-25 10:12:47 UTC --- > So why doesn't it have DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME set? No idea. I suppose it is not seen by free_lang_data for whatever reason. Honza

[Bug target/50440] 128 bit unsigned int subtraction generates too many register moves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50440 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/50280] Incorrect type deduced for T& when passed a const bitfield

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50280 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-25 10:43:03 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sun Sep 25 10:43:00 2011 New Revision: 179163 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179163 Log: 2011-09-25 Paolo Carlini PR c++/

[Bug c++/50280] Incorrect type deduced for T& when passed a const bitfield

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50280 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-25 10:54:07 UTC --- Johannes, sorry about the dumb question: now I understand the issue decently well - and after all boils down to adding a warning - but I'm not sure to understand your code snippet: is

[Bug c/50466] Compiled code behaves differently with "-O2 -fPIC" flag combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50466 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/50463] [4.6/4.7 Regression] -ftree-dse leeds to wrong code with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50463 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-25 11:07:48 UTC --- Smells like a Frontend decl merging issue.

[Bug preprocessor/48839] #error should terminate compilation - similar to missing #include

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48839 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/50460] [4.7 Regression] __builtin___strcpy_chk/__builtin_object_size don't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50460 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-25 11:11:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Looking at: > const char *str1 = "JIHGFEDCBA"; > #define strcpy(x,y) __builtin___strcpy_chk (x, y, __builtin_object_size (x, > 1)) > > int > f1 (void) >

[Bug tree-optimization/50452] [4.7 Regression] Internal compiler error: verify_flow_info failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50452 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/45581] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45581 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/44499] [4.7 Regression?] No default constructor available

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/43393] integral promotion of long bit-fields broken in gcc 4.4.0?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43393 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug c++/40574] -O3 cause segfault in loop in hunspell

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40574 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug regression/50472] Volatile qualification in data is not enough to avoid optimization over pointer to data

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50472 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/38502] static_assert vs. enums

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38502 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/50474] GCC (cc1plus) hangs forever compiling with -O2 (-fcse-follow-jumps)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50474 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/50475] [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at passes.c:1730

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50475 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/50480] 10% performance regression on Spec2006 410.bwaves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* --- Comment #3 from Richard G

[Bug lto/50483] lto turns visibility from HIDDEN to DEFAULT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50483 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto CC|

[Bug regression/50484] [4.6 regression] ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0, conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||ia64-*-freebsd9.0 Target Milestone|-

[Bug testsuite/50485] gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-blendps.c fails spuriously on i686

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50485 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/50489] [UPC/IA64] mis-schedule of MEM ref with -ftree-vectorize and -fschedule-insns2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-09-25 12:13:44 UTC --- D.3059_11 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(D.3058); looks like bogus IL to me. You view D.3058, a struct of size 16, as a pointer (of size 8). I suppose you want to load D.3058.vaddr here?

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49126] timevar_stack faild because define_label

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49126 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c/50507] Huge amount of memory used while building GCC4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50507 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complex produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48667] [ skipping N instantiation contexts ] Skips exactly those which are of interest to me

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48667 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug target/49468] SH Target: inefficient integer abs code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49468 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24625|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/46105] Ordering failure among partial specializations with non-deduced context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46105 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 f

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 Rafał Mużyło changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complex produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-25 12:56:53 UTC --- Indeed 4.5.3 works for me.

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complex produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complex produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-25 13:30:28 UTC --- Actually I tried 179164, not 4.5.3 proper, sorry. The fix must be very recent, then.

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 --- Comment #9 from Rafał Mużyło 2011-09-25 13:33:42 UTC --- What I'm trying to say is that gcc should either: - accept the code even with -fno-ipa-cp - reject the code even with -fipa-cp - print better diagnostics, if -fipa-cp should be the magi

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 --- Comment #10 from Rafał Mużyło 2011-09-25 13:51:14 UTC --- So, I ran one more test: gcc-4.6.1 -O2 -Wall -c -o fprintf-mini-bug-4.6.o fprintf-mini-bug-4.6.i -fno-align-functions -fno-align-jumps -fno-align-labels -fno-align-loops -fno-caller-sa

[Bug c++/44499] [4.7 Regression?] No default constructor available

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-25 13:57:13 UTC --- Probably this change: 2011-09-23 Jason Merrill Core 253 - allow const objects with no initializer or user-provided default constructor if the defaulted construc

[Bug c++/44499] No default constructor available

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44499 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 --- Comment #6 from Johannes Schaub 2011-09-25 14:22:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Johannes, sorry about the dumb question: now I understand the issue decently > well - and after all boils down to adding a warning - but I'm not sure to >

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW AssignedTo|paolo.carlini at o

[Bug c++/47791] finish function is using absolute value instead of the #defined one

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47791 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-25 14:52:50 UTC --- It seems to me that the SF_* that you are mentioning actually are meant for start_preparsed_function, not for finish_function. The latter should probably have its own FF_* in cp-tree.h

[Bug c++/45509] program abort after compiled with gcc-4.5.1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45509 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/42222] GCC ooms when building KDE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug libstdc++/43622] no C++ typeinfo for __float128 and __int128

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43622 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||john.salmon at deshaw dot

[Bug c++/40855] undefined reference to `typeinfo for __int128'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40855 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/39778] Using DJGPP to compile CPP file and get failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39778 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/41158] segfault while using PCH

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41158 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/18835] memory consumption is high for C++ testcase

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18835 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/48667] [ skipping N instantiation contexts ] Skips exactly those which are of interest to me

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48667 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/44783] implement -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brian.amberg at unibas dot

[Bug c++/48667] [ skipping N instantiation contexts ] Skips exactly those which are of interest to me

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48667 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/50444] unaligned movdqa instruction after inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444 --- Comment #1 from John Salmon 2011-09-25 15:22:07 UTC --- Here's a slightly smaller test case. The problem is the 'movdqa'. According the x86-64 ABI, rsp+8 is 16-bit aligned at the entry to main, and therefore so is %rdi when we try to execut

[Bug c++/50504] g++ 4.5.2 -O2 with complex produces incorrect code on AMD64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50504 --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-09-25 15:25:01 UTC --- According to my bisection, the bug started on trunk for 4.5.0 with r147851, stopped on trunk for 4.6.0 with r164136, and stopped on 4.5 branch with r175813. I can't say if those fi

[Bug c++/45880] Template-Methode in Shared Object not resolved when compiled with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45880 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/45169] C++ Hello World mudflap violations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45169 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/41966] g++ produces spurious alignment errors for prototypes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41966 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/42032] Aliasing errors in stl_tree.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42032 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/42032] Aliasing errors in stl_tree.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42032 --- Comment #11 from Evan Martin 2011-09-25 16:02:25 UTC --- I am on personal leave until 2012. If you're within Google, you can read http://www/~evanm/leave.html for more. Otherwise, for Chrome questions you can try asking t...@chromium.org, a

[Bug c++/39699] No error reporting when function and variable have the same name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39699 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c++/39751] ICE in cp_lexer_new_from_tokens, at cp/parser.c:342

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39751 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-25 16:08:15 UTC --- *** Bug 46858 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/46858] ICE: in cp_lexer_new_from_tokens, at cp/parser.c:464

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46858 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/44725] -pedantic should report gcc extension

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44725 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/41966] g++ produces spurious alignment errors for prototypes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41966 --- Comment #2 from Jens Gustedt 2011-09-25 16:33:05 UTC --- Just to add to the list, since this finally found some attention. The problem is also manifest for 4.5.2, only the difference is that this time the three line version at the end of the

[Bug c++/41995] Incorrect point of instantiation for function template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41995 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |NEW CC|gcc-bugs at gcc do

[Bug c++/50512] New: surprising change in overloading resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50512 Bug #: 50512 Summary: surprising change in overloading resolution Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/43393] integral promotion of long bit-fields broken in gcc 4.4.0?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43393 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-09-25 16:51:02 UTC --- On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > I'm tempted to close this, then. Comment #4 raises a C issue, however, maybe > Joseph wants to have a loo

[Bug c++/50512] surprising change in overloading resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50512 --- Comment #1 from mm at mezzarobba dot net 2011-09-25 16:51:17 UTC --- Created attachment 25361 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25361 testcase

[Bug c++/50512] surprising change in overloading resolution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50512 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/34014] conversion operators misprinted in gimple dump

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34014 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/32118] ICE in c++ code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32118 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/43393] integral promotion of long bit-fields broken in gcc 4.4.0?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43393 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/50444] unaligned movdqa instruction after inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/50506] gcc fails at assembly with -O1 while inlining is forced

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50506 --- Comment #12 from Rafał Mużyło 2011-09-25 18:02:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) Does the WONTFIX resolution here mean that glibc will need a fix then ?

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #32 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-09-25 18:05:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) > * expmed.c > (store_bit_field_1): Use the new interfaces. > > I'll continue trying to minimize the changeset. Of the three translatio

[Bug bootstrap/50513] New: cross configurations fail to build ipa-inline-analysis.o with -Werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50513 Bug #: 50513 Summary: cross configurations fail to build ipa-inline-analysis.o with -Werror Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug c/50507] Huge amount of memory used while building GCC4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50507 --- Comment #2 from Roger Meyer 2011-09-25 19:03:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) i'm using the stock gcc 4.4 that comes with debian 6 i386 compiling gcc 4.5.3 with the following options ./configure --with-newlib --with-headers=no --prefix=/

[Bug bootstrap/50513] cross configurations fail to build ipa-inline-analysis.o with -Werror

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50513 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #1

[Bug rtl-optimization/50489] [UPC/IA64] mis-schedule of MEM ref with -ftree-vectorize and -fschedule-insns2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489 --- Comment #6 from Gary Funck 2011-09-25 19:58:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > D.3059_11 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR(D.3058); > > looks like bogus IL to me. You view D.3058, a struct of size 16, as > a pointer (of size 8). I suppose you want

[Bug fortran/50514] New: gfortran should check ISHFT & ISHFTC aruments (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50514 Bug #: 50514 Summary: gfortran should check ISHFT & ISHFTC aruments (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug fortran/50515] New: gfortran should not accept an external that is a common (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50515 Bug #: 50515 Summary: gfortran should not accept an external that is a common (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50516] New: gfortran must detect illegal statements in a block data (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50516 Bug #: 50516 Summary: gfortran must detect illegal statements in a block data (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50517] New: gfortran must detect that actual argument type is different from dummy argument type (r178939)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50517 Bug #: 50517 Summary: gfortran must detect that actual argument type is different from dummy argument type (r178939) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug regression/50484] [4.6 regression] ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0, conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484 --- Comment #2 from Anton Shterenlikht 2011-09-25 20:24:24 UTC --- Gerald has provided a fix for the _Unwind_FindTableEntry FreeBSD ia64 issue (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45650). With this fix, 4.7 on ia64 FreeBSD now gives the

[Bug regression/50484] [4.6 regression] ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0, conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484 --- Comment #3 from Anton Shterenlikht 2011-09-25 20:25:19 UTC --- Created attachment 25362 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25362 libgcc config.log from ia64 FreeBSD

[Bug c++/42844] const variable requires initializer / no explicitly declared default constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42844 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-25 20:29:09 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Sep 25 20:29:04 2011 New Revision: 179170 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179170 Log: Core 234 - allow const objects with no initial

[Bug c++/20039] uninitialized const in `new' of `const struct'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20039 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-25 20:29:09 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Sep 25 20:29:04 2011 New Revision: 179170 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179170 Log: Core 234 - allow const objects with no initiali

[Bug c++/50518] New: repeated c++11 opaque enum declarations are invalid

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518 Bug #: 50518 Summary: repeated c++11 opaque enum declarations are invalid Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

  1   2   >