http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43393
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2011-09-25 16:51:02 UTC --- On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > I'm tempted to close this, then. Comment #4 raises a C issue, however, maybe > Joseph wants to have a look? For C we treat long:33 as its own type, following some C90 DRs and the changes made in C99 following those DRs, and as it's wider than int it doesn't get promoted.
