http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||alias
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48694
--- Comment #2 from John Regehr 2011-04-19 21:52:22
UTC ---
Same testcase dies after consuming about 14 GB virtual memory on a machine with
8 GB of RAM.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-04-19
21:58:44 UTC ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Tue Apr 19 21:58:41 2011
New Revision: 172738
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172738
Log:
PR testsuite/48676
* gcc.dg/torture/pr3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-04-19 22:15:23
UTC ---
Created attachment 24049
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24049
partially reduced testcase
$ g++ testcase.C -O2
$ valgrind -q ./a.out
==20686== Invalid write of siz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48692
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-19
22:28:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> That also nicely works - the symbol only pops up suddenly when calling
> gfc_dump_module, which seems to be a bug in gfc_dump_module.
More precisely, it occ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #4 from Andr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48695
--- Comment #6 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-04-19 23:06:31
UTC ---
Created attachment 24050
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24050
reduced testcase
I am not sure if it is reduced correctly. However, -fno-strict-aliasing
prevents the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-19
23:50:12 UTC ---
Dodji, is there any reason not to apply this fix to 4.5 as well?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #4 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-19
23:52:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 24051
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24051
backport patch for 4.6 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #5 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-19
23:52:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 24052
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24052
backport patch for 4.5 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #7 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-19
23:53:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 24054
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24054
backport patch for 4.3 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #6 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-19
23:52:39 UTC ---
Created attachment 24053
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24053
backport patch for 4.4 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #8 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-19
23:53:18 UTC ---
Hi, Kojima-san.
Thank you for commiting this.
Could you commit this to other branch?
I prepared a patch for each branch.
Best regards,
Nobuhiro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-20
00:06:22 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 20 00:06:19 2011
New Revision: 172745
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172745
Log:
PR c++/45267
* decl.c (duplicate_decls): K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-20
00:06:22 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 20 00:06:19 2011
New Revision: 172745
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172745
Log:
PR c++/45267
* decl.c (duplicate_decls): K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48684
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #36 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-20
04:18:31 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Apr 20 04:18:25 2011
New Revision: 172753
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172753
Log:
2011-04-19 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
Summary: Horrible bitfield code generation on x86
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48696
--- Comment #1 from Linus Torvalds 2011-04-20
04:28:18 UTC ---
Side note, this is talked about in the Intel optimization manual
3.6.4 Store Forwarding
Under "General Optimization Guidelines" -> "Optimizing Memory Accesses" ->
"Store Forwardin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #10 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-20
06:03:41 UTC ---
Hi, Kojima-san.
Oh, I completely forgot about it.
Thanks,
Nobuhiro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48657
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-20
06:31:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 20 06:31:07 2011
New Revision: 172755
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172755
Log:
PR c++/46304
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-20
06:31:54 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 20 06:31:51 2011
New Revision: 172756
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172756
Log:
PR c++/46304
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-20
06:30:45 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 20 06:30:41 2011
New Revision: 172754
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172754
Log:
PR c++/46304
* typeck.c (cp_build_binary_o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #18
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #37 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-20 06:43:37 UTC ---
The same issue exists with the first comparison (decision between FMT_E and
FMT_F).
Consider:
print "(g35.25)", 0.095d0 ! > 0.95..11..E-01
print "(g35.25)", 0.095_10
print "(RC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-20
06:48:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Is it intentional that the change hasn't been committed to 4.6, just 4.5 and
> 4.7?
Yes. In 4.5 it fixes an ICE; in 4.6 and 4.7 it is a minor correctness
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
101 - 134 of 134 matches
Mail list logo