http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267

--- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-04-20 
06:48:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Is it intentional that the change hasn't been committed to 4.6, just 4.5 and
> 4.7?

Yes.  In 4.5 it fixes an ICE; in 4.6 and 4.7 it is a minor correctness fix that
doesn't seem important to apply to the release branch since we inline the
function anyway.

Reply via email to