[Bug fortran/48059] [4.6 Regression][OOP] ICE in in gfc_conv_component_ref: character function of extended type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48059 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-10 23:15:40 UTC --- This is indeed cause by revision 170284 (no ICE at r 170283).

[Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-10 23:19:30 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > The "Bus error" seems fixed by the patch in > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829#c32. Well, it does not fix it, it just hides the problem: Th

[Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066 --- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-10 23:34:53 UTC --- For completeness, the submitted asked at c.l.f whether the program is valid; Richard Maine thinks so. (I concur ;-) http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thre

[Bug fortran/48066] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Segfault with SUM of zero-sized array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48066 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Known to work|

[Bug c++/48021] [trans-mem] call to an undefined clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48021 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/47952] [trans-mem] undefined reference to transaction clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952 --- Comment #14 from Richard Henderson 2011-03-10 23:42:10 UTC --- *** Bug 48021 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/47952] [trans-mem] undefined reference to transaction clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952 --- Comment #15 from Richard Henderson 2011-03-10 23:45:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Should I fill a new PR for this even if I don't have any real testcase? Yes please.

[Bug c++/47952] [trans-mem] undefined reference to transaction clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/48067] New: FMA with no add operand produced by convert_mul_to_fma

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48067 Summary: FMA with no add operand produced by convert_mul_to_fma Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/48067] FMA with no add operand produced by convert_mul_to_fma

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48067 --- Comment #1 from William J. Schmidt 2011-03-11 00:55:30 UTC --- Created attachment 23620 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23620 Failing subroutine from 191.fma3d Sorry the subroutine was mangled in the comments. Here's a c

[Bug libfortran/48047] Incorrect output rounding of double precision numbers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48047 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-03-11 00:59:04 UTC --- I am OK with this simple patch, but will have to run the testsuite to make sure its all OK on our other testsuite cases. (Not very many at the moment)

[Bug tree-optimization/37916] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] SSA names causing register pressure; unnecessarily many simultaneously "live" names.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37916 --- Comment #20 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-11 01:31:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > Random thought on this PR: With a scheduler description, -fschedule-insns > -fsched-pressure may help. That theory should be testable by compiling fo

[Bug target/48068] New: loongson intrinsics improvement opportunities

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48068 Summary: loongson intrinsics improvement opportunities Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug target/48068] loongson intrinsics improvement opportunities

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48068 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-11 02:33:00 UTC --- Created attachment 23622 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23622 Trivial stdint.h suitable for showing the problem after "make all-gcc" standalone

[Bug target/48068] loongson intrinsics improvement opportunities

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48068 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-11 02:42:15 UTC --- Created attachment 23623 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23623 With --target=mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu, result of "./xgcc -W -Wall -O2 -B./ -S -I. -march=loongs

[Bug target/48068] loongson intrinsics improvement opportunities

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48068 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-03-11 02:48:00 UTC --- Created attachment 23624 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23624 23623: With --target=mips64el-unknown-linux-gnu, result of "./xgcc -W -Wall -O2 -B./ -S -I. -mar

[Bug middle-end/45962] [4.6 Regression]: many c/c++ failures on cris-elf, in r165236:165242

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45962 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48069] New: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48069 Summary: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/48069] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48069 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/48069] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48069 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

<    1   2