http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-08 08:03:22
UTC ---
Just out of interest. What binutils version you are using? As error message
indicates that the ld tool doesn't recognize -plugin command.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #34 from Paolo Bonzini 2011-02-08 08:06:28
UTC ---
Iain,
the correct fix is to add -module to the LTO plugin LDFLAGS. This changes the
extension from .dylib to .so.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528
--- Comment #7 from Dongsheng Song 2011-02-08
08:56:26 UTC ---
The source of binutils for native compiler same as the cross building compiler,
so I think this maybe an autotools bug of binutils:
oracle@vc:~/vcs/git/binutils$ git log -1
commit c4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528
--- Comment #8 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-08 09:25:38
UTC ---
Is binutils build using option '--enable-plugins'? It is worth a try. AFAICS is
there in ld's configure.ac a quirk about the header-check windows.h. It uses
here Windows.h, which can lead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
Summary: real(kind=16) - libquadmath - segfault on amd64
FreeBSD
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #35 from Iain Sandoe 2011-02-08 09:56:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #34)
> the correct fix is to add -module to the LTO plugin LDFLAGS. This changes the
> extension from .dylib to .so.
Thanks, I suppose the intention of the other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #36 from Paolo Bonzini 2011-02-08 10:00:41
UTC ---
No, it should be added for all targets.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528
--- Comment #9 from Dongsheng Song 2011-02-08
10:04:25 UTC ---
Thanks, with the following patch (Windows.h => windows.h),
the building OK now:
$ git diff ld/configure.in ld/plugin.c
diff --git a/ld/configure.in b/ld/configure.in
index 2836545..b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #37 from Iain Sandoe 2011-02-08 10:10:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> No, it should be added for all targets.
so..
Index: lto-plugin/Makefile.am
===
--- lto-plu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47639
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47641
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47643
Summary: x86 -mtune docs still imply i386 is the default for
codegen
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47632
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-08
10:44:12 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 8 10:44:06 2011
New Revision: 169917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169917
Log:
2011-02-08 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-08
10:45:31 UTC ---
The audit trail is a little fuzzy here but it seems like this wasn't present at
r137753 but was at r138906 for -m32 on i686-apple-darwin9. We also had PR37012
opened for this at one po
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47632
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #14 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-08
10:50:43 UTC ---
157762 seems to have new code that outputs a dwarf register number without
going though DWARF2_FRAME_REG_OUT which I think is wrong.
I fixed that and played around for a bit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-08
10:57:38 UTC ---
These probably were failing since added here...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00647.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528
--- Comment #11 from Dongsheng Song
2011-02-08 11:04:32 UTC ---
I don't known where I report the following issue:
C:\>gcc -O2 -pipe Hello.c
C:\>a
Hello, World!
C:\>gcc -O2 -pipe -flto Hello.c
c:/gcc-4.6-windows/bin/../lib/gcc/i686-w64-mingw32/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47528
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-08 11:14:09
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I don't known where I report the following issue:
>
> C:\>gcc -O2 -pipe Hello.c
>
> C:\>a
> Hello, World!
>
> C:\>gcc -O2 -pipe -flto Hello.c
> c:/gcc-4.6-w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47617
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-08
11:35:32 UTC ---
Well, this case is slightly different as we simply have const/pure builtins
that do not only depend on their arguments (but the FP state). Thus we'd need
to trop the attributes fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46661
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47644
Summary: [avr] Regression in choosing registers
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47644
--- Comment #1 from Ángel 2011-02-08 11:47:46 UTC
---
Created attachment 23276
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23276
gcc 4.3.3 assembler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47644
--- Comment #2 from Ángel 2011-02-08 11:48:37 UTC
---
Created attachment 23277
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23277
gcc 4.2 assembler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47639
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-08
12:09:09 UTC ---
Ugh. We lower
[LP 1] D.2691_8 = v1_6(D) / v2_7(D);
to
D.2699_13 = BIT_FIELD_REF ;
D.2700_14 = BIT_FIELD_REF ;
D.2701_15 = D.2699_13 / D.2700_14;
D.2702_16 = BIT_FIELD_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47645
Summary: Generic vector lowering does not preserve EH
information
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-08
12:36:19 UTC ---
OK, thanks for spotting that. I will have a look.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47641
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-08
12:53:53 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 8 12:53:50 2011
New Revision: 169925
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169925
Log:
2011-02-08 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47641
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-02-08
13:00:49 UTC ---
Jakub, if you have time to fix this, please do. It may take me several days to
get to this because of time constraints.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45978
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenthe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46394
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenthe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47049
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47049
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-08
13:58:17 UTC ---
It is a regression in the sense that e.g. the #c10 testcase with 4.4 resulted
in a bunch of errors, but not an ICE, while it ICEs in 4.6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47092
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-08
14:04:23 UTC ---
The question is how accurrate we expect the n argument to be (e.g. for
#include
int
main (void)
{
char buf[1024];
int i;
__float128 f;
for (i = 1, f = 2; i <= 256; i++, f *=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47243
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47326
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenthe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47639
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-08
14:16:53 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Feb 8 14:16:50 2011
New Revision: 169926
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169926
Log:
2011-02-08 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47092
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-02-08
14:22:17 UTC ---
The slow-down appeared between revisions 167992 and 168504.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47326
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-08
14:30:36 UTC ---
The code is valid C++0x (so the summary should include [C++0x])
It doesn't ICE if sizeof...(_ARGS) is used instead of sizeof...(args), or if
the sizeof... expression occurs in the f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47390
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-08
14:36:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > Joseph - 4.5 handled -export-dynamic by passing it through to the linker
> > (not exactly su
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47640
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-02-08 14:37:27
UTC ---
tree-ssa-forwprop is either not doing the right thing WRT EH edges when it
removes statements which potentially throw or shouldn't be removing the
potentially throwing statements.
Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-08
14:39:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> forwprop is a forward walk, for this kind of optimization we want to walk
> backwards, from the narrowing integer conversion to the operations and
> when
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47482
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47640
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47632
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-02-08 14:45:16
UTC ---
*** Bug 47640 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47484
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47497
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|[4.6 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47614
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-08
14:52:25 UTC ---
I can't reproduce this with a cross compiler unfortunately, but perhaps using
check_for_inc_dec (currently static in dse.c) when deleting insn where needed
in postreload.c might fix th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47503
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47646
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Revision 169918 caused many testsuite
failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47511
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47527
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47584
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-linux |powerpc64-linux,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47622
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Component|debug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47639
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47646
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47420
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47488
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47560
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47241
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-08 15:41:35
UTC ---
Works for me with current mainline gold and eglibc 2.11.1 on Ubuntu Lucid. Can
you show me the -v line from your link command?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18885
Ludovic Courtès changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ludo at gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47647
Summary: BLOCKs are empty
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: lto
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson 2011-02-08
16:17:10 UTC ---
I don't think we really want to pursue this further.
I had hoped to find a solution that satisfied the older apple compiler -- it
is supposed to support altivec after all -- but i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe 2011-02-08 16:44:15
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I don't think we really want to pursue this further.
>
> I had hoped to find a solution that satisfied the older apple compiler -- it
> is supposed to suppor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47646
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-02-08
16:46:25 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Tue Feb 8 16:46:20 2011
New Revision: 169927
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169927
Log:
2011-02-08 Andreas Krebbel
PR middle-en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381
--- Comment #11 from Richard Henderson 2011-02-08
16:52:41 UTC ---
Yes, a patch like in #1 would be fine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46994
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-08 16:54:03
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Feb 8 16:53:57 2011
New Revision: 169928
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169928
Log:
Fix PRs 46834, 46994, and 46995: only rewrite reduct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46834
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-08 16:54:04
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Feb 8 16:53:57 2011
New Revision: 169928
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169928
Log:
Fix PRs 46834, 46994, and 46995: only rewrite reduct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47390
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-02-08 16:54:19 UTC ---
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Hm, I see. The -e LINK_COMMAND_SPEC isn't documented in invoke.texi
> "Link Options", do we generally not do t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46834
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46995
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-08 16:54:03
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Feb 8 16:53:57 2011
New Revision: 169928
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169928
Log:
Fix PRs 46834, 46994, and 46995: only rewrite reduct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46994
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46995
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47648
Summary: libgfortran/libgfortran.h:53:29: fatal error:
quadmath_weak.h: No such f ile or directory - FreeBSD
ia64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47649
Summary: install-info: No such file or directory for
/usr/local/info/gcc46/libquadmath.info
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47622
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47481
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|ebotcazou at gcc d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47243
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47642
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47649
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
--- Comment #9 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-02-08 18:41:53
UTC ---
I just tried glibc 2.12.2 on Fedora 13 and it worked there too. I don't have a
Fedora 14 system.
This program eats memory and your numbers show it had allocated over 434M when
it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42893
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-02-08
18:54:21 UTC ---
Author: law
Date: Tue Feb 8 18:54:12 2011
New Revision: 169933
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169933
Log:
PR tree-optimization/42893
* gcc.tree-ssa/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42893
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo