http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46465
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-12-03 08:24:00
UTC ---
Created attachment 22609
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22609
different testcase
This testcase is a bit longer, but it needs simpler flags:
$ gcc -O -fgcse -fno-t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46755
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-12-03 08:25:50
UTC ---
PR46465 might be related, it has the same backtrace and uses computed gotos as
well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46625
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-12-03
08:44:26 UTC ---
While MinGW64 now mangles the symbols, I think MinGW.org does not. As I was
told, the issue also affects the 32bit MinGW.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43751
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe 2010-12-03 08:58:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Please add a comment with a testcase that fails to work. I tried the obvious
> one, and when .f is added to darwin9.h, it worked.
Indeed, between my comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46003
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46777
Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in rtl_verify_flow_info, at
cfgrtl.c:2164 with -O -fgcse -fno-tree-dominator-opts
-funroll-loops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46715
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46693
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46631
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46329
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46483
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46508
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46508
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2010-12-03
10:20:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> A patch was submitted here. Does this fix your problem ?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg02878.html
I'm currently doing a 4.6 bootstr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45885
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45937
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45252
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45159
--- Comment #23 from Thomas Koenig 2010-12-03
10:35:16 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Dec 3 10:35:12 2010
New Revision: 167413
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167413
Log:
2010-12-02 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/4515
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #25 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-12-03 10:47:49 UTC ---
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, mrs at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
>
> m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46715
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2010-12-03
10:49:30 UTC ---
I don't see a problem with trunk FWIW. using arm-eabi on a x86_64 linux host.
Don't have access to i386-apple-darwin8.11.1 host
Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #26 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-12-03 10:51:06 UTC ---
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
>
> --- Comment #25 from rguenther at suse dot de
> 2010-12-03 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39501
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Kno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
Maxim Kuvyrkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46778
Summary: More SFINAE issues?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46778
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #27 from Iain Sandoe 2010-12-03 11:29:59
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, rguenther at suse dot de wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
> >
> > --- Comment #25 from rguenther at suse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46779
Summary: wrong code generation for array access
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46778
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-12-03
11:32:00 UTC ---
the test looks valid to me, this simpler version is also rejected
template
class is_constructible_mini2
{
typedef char __one;
typedef struct { char __arr[2]; } __two;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45354
--- Comment #10 from Alexander Monakov 2010-12-03
12:04:22 UTC ---
Author: amonakov
Date: Fri Dec 3 12:04:16 2010
New Revision: 167415
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167415
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/45354
* sel-sch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45354
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46749
--- Comment #28 from Iain Sandoe 2010-12-03 12:10:42
UTC ---
another thing that might help is to hack gcc/spec to put "dsymutil --symtab"
that causes dsymutil to dump what it found in the exec and exit without doing
the debug-link.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46780
Summary: -fgraphite-identity ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at
tree-ssa-alias.c:1081
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34749
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig 2010-12-03
12:23:14 UTC ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Dec 3 12:23:11 2010
New Revision: 167416
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167416
Log:
2010-12-03 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/44352
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45885
--- Comment #3 from Ryan Mansfield 2010-12-03
12:25:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> As I've said in the past, the arm-none-linux-gnu target really hasn't been
> validated for neon support and thus it is likely that there are parts which
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2010-12-03
12:26:21 UTC ---
The infinite recursion is fixed, the original problem remains.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46781
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Missing optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46781
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2010-12-03 12:38:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 22613
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22613
Code produced by GCC 4.5.2
C source is in attachment 19980.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46772
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth 2010-12-03 12:46:15
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Dec 3 12:46:12 2010
New Revision: 167422
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167422
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2010-11-02 Rainer Orth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig 2010-12-03
12:50:24 UTC ---
Reduced test case, not that there was a lot to reduce:
character*2 ddname,dname
dname(x)= 'x'
ddname=dname(0.0)
END
(the test succeeds with character*1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45885
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2010-12-03
13:21:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> $ ./xgcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc
> Target: arm-unknown-linux-gnu
> Configured with: ../configure --target=arm-unknown-linux-gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46769
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46777
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46779
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-03
13:37:46 UTC ---
at least I see r1 use in the asm but no clobber for it, instead it clobbers
the seemingly unused r31.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45370
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |tree-optimization
Target Milestone|-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46780
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45370
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wouter.vermaelen at scarlet
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46781
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46779
--- Comment #2 from Michael Schulze 2010-12-03
13:58:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> at least I see r1 use in the asm but no clobber for it, instead it clobbers
> the seemingly unused r31.
Yes correct, r1 is not clobbered, however, I tested
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46779
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
Version|4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46782
Summary: -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -fvar-tracking
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46783
Summary: [OOP] TRANSFER with polymorphic MOLD=
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46779
--- Comment #4 from Michael Schulze 2010-12-03
14:16:30 UTC ---
> I don't know anything about AVR, so I can't say that (I just noticed the r1
> issue).
Ok due to the compiler abi for the avr, r0,r1 are fixed registers that are
never allocated by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46784
Summary: Internal compiler error with cairo In function
`_cairo_bo_sweep_line_compare_edges'
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39501
--- Comment #17 from Martin Guy 2010-12-03
14:46:28 UTC ---
Sort of. The cause of the bug was never found, and the workaround is to disable
an instruction. It might be worth trying enabling movsfcc in current GCC and
re-running the tests, since
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
14:49:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 22615
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22615
assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-init-v2di-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10
at r167372
Generated w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
14:50:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 22616
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22616
assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-init-v2di-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10
at r167375
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46785
Summary: Doesn't vectorize reduction x += y*y
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46786
Summary: ICE: verify_stmts failed: statement marked for throw,
but doesn't with -fopenmp -fnon-call-exceptions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46777
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-03 15:06:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Created attachment 22616 [details]
> assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-init-v2di-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10
> at r167375
It was fixed by revision 167398.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
15:21:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > Created attachment 22616 [details] [details]
> > assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-init-v2di-2.c on
> > x86_64-apple-darw
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-12-03 15:21:51 UTC ---
Jan, your patch has broken bootstrap on two platforms for a week now,
and there's not even an indication that you're looking at the problem.
Please fix or revert AS
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46784
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2010-12-03
15:26:32 UTC ---
gcc-3.4.6 is no longer supported upstream. Please upgrade to gcc-4.4 or
gcc-4.5.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46758
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46787
Summary: Does not vectorize loop with load from scalar variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-03 15:34:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > (In reply to comment #8)
> > > Created attachment 22616 [details] [details] [details]
> > > assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46787
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-03
15:37:16 UTC ---
To fix:
/* FIXME -- data dependence analysis does not work correctly for objects
with invariant addresses in loop nests. Let us fail here until the
problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788
Summary: unsigned int possible treated as signed in a
union/struct
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45133
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan W
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46781
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22612|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46785
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-03
15:39:49 UTC ---
Btw, I wonder why we bother to check the defs at all and not just do
def1 && flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, gimple_bb (def1))
we should be able to handle all vectorizable reduc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46769
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-03 15:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46789
Summary: go configuration with --prefix=/usr pollutes the
/usr/lib namespace
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44352
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2010-12-03
15:55:42 UTC ---
This works:
character*2 ddname,dname
dname(x)= 'x '
ddname=dname(0.0)
END
We fail to pad the string for this case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46745
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-03
16:10:43 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Dec 3 16:10:36 2010
New Revision: 167433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167433
Log:
2010-12-03 Richard Guenther
PR c/46745
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
16:20:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 22619
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22619
assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-init-v2di-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10
at r167430
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #13 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
16:20:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 22620
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22620
assembly file from gcc.target/i386/sse2-init-v2di-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10
at r167430 with darwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #14 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
16:22:05 UTC ---
Created attachment 22621
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22621
darwin core2 patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46745
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46769
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Richard Gu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46788
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-12-03
16:25:40 UTC ---
Please report to CodeSourcery or use a FSF version.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46784
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
16:27:52 UTC ---
I understand the issue now. Stock r167430 is fine but the addition of the
approved patch to fix the md files and default i386 darwin to -mtune=core2
causes the failure in...
FAIL: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #16 from Jack Howarth 2010-12-03
16:29:31 UTC ---
Note the original i386 darwin patch with the rational for the movq to movd
assembly changes can be found at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-08/msg01024.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46768
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-03 16:40:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I understand the issue now. Stock r167430 is fine but the addition of the
> approved patch to fix the md files and default i386 darwin to -mtune=core2
> causes t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46761
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45638
Ralf Wildenhues changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46058
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2010-12-03
16:56:42 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 3 16:56:37 2010
New Revision: 167435
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167435
Log:
PR c++/46058
* tree.c (lvalue_kind) [SCOPE_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46123
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2010-12-03
16:56:59 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Dec 3 16:56:53 2010
New Revision: 167436
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167436
Log:
PR debug/46123
* dwarf2out.c (gen_tagged_ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-12-03 17:22:07 UTC ---
On Fri, 03 Dec 2010, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
>
> --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielef
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
--- Comment #21 from Anh Vo 2010-12-03 17:45:58
UTC ---
Executing command 'file gcc/doc/tm.texi' yields
../gcc-4.6-20101113/gcc/doc/tm.texi: ASCII English text, with CRLF line
terminators.
However, executing command 'file gcc/tm.texi' in the bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
--- Comment #22 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-12-03 17:57:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Executing command 'file gcc/doc/tm.texi' yields
> ../gcc-4.6-20101113/gcc/doc/tm.texi: ASCII English text, with CRLF line
> terminators.
So, doe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
--- Comment #23 from Anh Vo 2010-12-03 18:08:27
UTC ---
Yes, it is. In fact, I downloaded it from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20101113/. The exact name of the
snapshot is gcc-4.6-20101113.tar.bz2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |REOPENED
--- Comment #24 from Jo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46769
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-12-03 18:28:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 22622
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22622
A testcase
/usr/gcc-4.6/bin/g++ -r -W -Wall -flto-partition=none -Werror
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
Summary: [4.6 regression] EH failures in libstdc++ testsuite
with --gc-sections and GNU ld 2.18
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
