http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22403|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46717
--- Comment #6 from Maeyanie 2010-11-30
08:15:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 22576
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22576
Profiling data
Since this crash appears only with -fprofile-use, the related profiling data
might be hand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #4 from Jie Zhang 2010-11-30 10:00:05 UTC
---
Hah, I now know the root cause. It's "*__GI_memchr" that is added into the
visible point set since it's a user provided name. But GCC looks for
"__GI_memchr" later, which is not the same i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45949
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-30
10:00:13 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 30 10:00:06 2010
New Revision: 167291
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167291
Log:
2010-11-30 Richard Guenther
PR lto/459
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46717
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44986
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-30
10:00:58 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 30 10:00:51 2010
New Revision: 167292
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167292
Log:
2010-11-30 Richard Guenther
PR lto/449
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43659
devurandom at gmx dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||devurandom at gmx dot net
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46718
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
--- Comment #30 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-30
10:15:02 UTC ---
>From a quick look I can see that with -fstrict-aliasing we will never consider
ptr->link.next to alias ptr->list.next (so if they are made to alias via
casting the testcase is inv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46719
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-30
10:36:42 UTC ---
Reduced to get rid of library dependencies:
template
struct function
{
template function(Functor) { }
};
template
int
curry(function func, FirstType)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46718
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46719
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46717
--- Comment #8 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-30 10:57:31
UTC ---
The compilation chokes with:
buf$_M_ptr_138 = PHI
Is this correct gimple?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46721
Summary: Unnecessary stack instructions are generated for SPU
when returning a struct
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46674
--- Comment #5 from Jie Zhang 2010-11-30 11:17:47 UTC
---
Created attachment 22577
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22577
The patch
I'm testing this patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46717
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45949
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44986
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45475
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-30
12:17:31 UTC ---
Confirmed.
Also doesn't work with -flto-partition=none:
> ./xgcc -B. -o t t.c -flto -m32 -march=i386 -flto-partition=none
In file included from t.c:16:0,
from :0:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46716
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-30
12:22:26 UTC ---
I think there is a dup somewhere. Note that IMHO disabling sse2 makes the
code suspicious as it cannot fulfill the ABI (I think the kernel uses
-mno-sse2 to disable use of SSE regi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
--- Comment #10 from Michael Haubenwallner 2010-11-30 12:22:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I believe the line number field in XCOFF is defined in
> /usr/include/linenum.h.
> According to that file, in 32 bit mode, line numbers are represe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46717
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46718
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-30 12:52:46 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Nov 30 12:52:38 2010
New Revision: 167294
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167294
Log:
2010-11-30 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
--- Comment #31 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-30
12:57:29 UTC ---
> From a quick look I can see that with -fstrict-aliasing we will never consider
> ptr->link.next to alias ptr->list.next (so if they are made to alias via
> casting the testcase is i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46594
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-30
12:58:47 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Nov 30 12:58:42 2010
New Revision: 167295
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167295
Log:
2010-11-30 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/46
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46717
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-30
13:12:59 UTC ---
Before transform:
;; succ: 50 (eh,exec) 40 [100.0%] count:63 (fallthru,exec)
:
D.479965_99 = MEM[(struct _List_node_base *)D.414535_48]._M_prev;
D.414537_51 = MEM[(struct l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46721
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46716
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|hjl at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46722
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Missed fma for x*x + y
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46722
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46723
Summary: internal compiler error: in
get_initial_def_for_induction, at
tree-vect-loop.c:2431
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: cr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46723
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Kretz 2010-11-30 13:50:55
UTC ---
Created attachment 22578
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22578
preprocessed source which makes G++ 4.5.1 ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46723
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
Summary: Wrong debug info: Invalid variable location
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-ibm-linux
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46717
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-30
14:33:03 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 30 14:33:00 2010
New Revision: 167298
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167298
Log:
2010-11-30 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46717
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46724
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel 2010-11-30
14:37:39 UTC ---
Compiling with
GCC 4.5.2 (gcc version 4.5.2 20101108 (prerelease) [gcc-4_5-branch revision
166433] (GCC))
GDB returns "" for 'a2' everywhere in function 'f'.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46722
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46594
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46722
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
--- Comment #32 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-30
15:10:58 UTC ---
The problem appears to be deeply rooted in the Ring construct, more precisely
in the HEAD trick. IIUC the idea is to "attach" a doubly-linked list to
another structure by means of a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46725
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE when compiling
libstdc++-v3/include/precompiled/stdc++.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
--- Comment #7 from Michael Schulze 2010-11-30
15:16:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 22579
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22579
alternative patch using register r15 instead of r20 avoids pushing/poping
In reaction to bug 29141
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46726
Summary: x*x has different cost than pow(x,2) with -ffast-math
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45263
--- Comment #8 from Michael Schulze 2010-11-30
15:21:57 UTC ---
Comment on attachment 22579
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22579
alternative patch using register r15 instead of r20 avoids pushing/poping
>diff -Naur gcc-4.5.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
Michael Haubenwallner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22538|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46725
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2010-11-30
15:37:59 UTC ---
*usual* ? ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
--- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-11-30 15:41:36 UTC ---
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
>
> --- Comment #32 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-30
> 15:10:5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
--- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn 2010-11-30
15:43:15 UTC ---
I assume that SP6100-04-07-1036 added a bounds error check for the line number
in the assembler, which previously ignored the overflow. I don't know what AIX
as did internally (trun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46727
Summary: ICE with -O3 and -ffast-math (in get_callee_fndecl, at
tree.c:6857)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46725
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-11-30
15:46:51 UTC ---
> *usual* ? ;)
Missing quotes around "usual suspect";-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46725
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-30
15:48:13 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Nov 30 15:48:09 2010
New Revision: 167300
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167300
Log:
PR middle-end/46725
Revert
2010-11-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46725
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45777
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig 2010-11-30
16:40:10 UTC ---
At least one problem occurs because the typespec of rref->u.c.sym is not
filled out correctly when chasing the refs on the rhs:
(gdb) p rref
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46722
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-30
16:55:40 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Nov 30 16:55:35 2010
New Revision: 167304
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167304
Log:
2010-11-30 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46709
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46722
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888
--- Comment #18 from Anh Vo 2010-11-30 17:00:31
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> * anhvofrcaus at gmail dot com wrote on Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 01:25:49AM CET:
> > It is interesting that this fix worked for Cesar but not for me. In fact, it
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46727
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40767
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill 2010-11-30 17:14:47
UTC ---
The 4.5 branch builds Ada for m68k-rtems4.11.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40767
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46716
--- Comment #5 from David Mathog 2010-11-30
17:25:01 UTC ---
A (long) side note on how I found this bug - in partial answer to the obvious
question - why would anybody run with -mno-sse2 on an X86_64 platform?
We have a cluster of Athlon MP ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42904
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42904
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
--- Comment #13 from hainque at adacore dot com
2010-11-30 17:49:20 UTC ---
dje at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Did something change in GCC that now generates line 0 debug
> information?
For Ada cases, we had mixups with BUILTINS_LOCATION. The test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
Summary: GCC no longer generates fmadd for pow (x, 0.75)+y on
powerpc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46729
Summary: Many 32-bit 30_threads execution tests fail on Solaris
10+/SPARC with as
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Sever
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46723
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-30 18:11:41
UTC ---
Created attachment 22583
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22583
A reduced testcase
[...@gnu-35 delta]$ /usr/gcc-4.5/bin/gcc -S -O3 testcase-min.cc
testcase-min.cc: In fun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46730
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Failed to profiledbootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46731
Summary: GCC shouts "cannot call member function 'void a::g()'
without object" if a is a dependent base class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24163
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||schaub-johannes at web dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43282
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46731
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-11-30
19:15:23 UTC ---
Actually it is not valid but for a different reason than what GCC gives. See
PR 24163, and PR 15272 for the reasons why g() should not be found when doing
the lookup.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46732
Summary: Valgrind emits false(?) alarms on boost::make_shared
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46723
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-30 19:20:29
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 161951:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-07/msg00305.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46731
--- Comment #2 from Johannes Schaub 2010-11-30
19:21:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Actually it is not valid but for a different reason than what GCC gives. See
> PR 24163, and PR 15272 for the reasons why g() should not be found when doi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46732
--- Comment #1 from Dave Steffen 2010-11-30
19:22:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 22584
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22584
Preprocessed source that produces the issue
Gzipped, since it's 1.1M and Bugzilla won't allow attachm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46732
--- Comment #2 from Dave Steffen 2010-11-30
19:32:34 UTC ---
The discussion on the Boost User's list can be found here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.user/63791/match=valgrind
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46719
Kohei Takahashi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||flast at flast dot jp
--- Comment #3 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46719
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-30
20:04:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
>
> Therefore compiler is unable to deduce template parameters that are Return,
> FirstType and ArgTypes.
Right, the lambda can be converted to double(*)(i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46730
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46732
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-30
20:27:48 UTC ---
there was a bug in a previous version of gcc where it wouldn't bind an rvalue
reference directly, and so std::forward returned a reference to a temporary
that's fixed in more recent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34022
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dgsteffen at numerica dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46732
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42986
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42986
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz 2010-11-30 20:56:40
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Nov 30 20:56:35 2010
New Revision: 167314
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167314
Log:
2010-11-30 Kai Tietz
Backport from mainlin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42986
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170
--- Comment #22 from David Fang 2010-11-30
21:11:02 UTC ---
Little ping: is this still expected to be fixed in 4.4.x and 4.5.x?
Not that it should matter, but it's still a rejects-valid showstopper for
compiling my project, which other users kee
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28105
--- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist 2010-11-30 21:33:36
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Tue Nov 30 21:33:32 2010
New Revision: 167317
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167317
Log:
PR fortran/28105 Overflow check for ALLOCATE stateme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45301
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45758
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #10 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #8 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-30 21:52:57 UTC ---
> On the other side, the above is still broken with
> -freorder-blocks-and-partition and I guess even before Honza's change it has
> been broken.
flag_reorder_blocks_an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46719
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #9 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-30 22:22:22 UTC ---
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010, John David Anglin wrote:
> > On the other side, the above is still broken with
> > -freorder-blocks-and-partition and I guess even before Honza's c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46719
Eric Lawless changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45199
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Po
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pcpa at mandriva dot com.
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
