http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46731

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-30 
19:15:23 UTC ---
Actually it is not valid but for a different reason than what GCC gives.  See
PR 24163, and PR 15272 for the reasons why g() should not be found when doing
the lookup.

Reply via email to