[Bug target/46353] [4.6 regression] fma testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46353 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/45352] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7058

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352 --- Comment #18 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-11-08 08:11:43 UTC --- Author: abel Date: Mon Nov 8 08:11:38 2010 New Revision: 166429 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166429 Log: PR rtl-optimization/45352 * se

[Bug target/46353] [4.6 regression] fma testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46353 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED Ever Confirmed|1

[Bug tree-optimization/46316] [4.6 regression] incorrect loop optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46316 --- Comment #16 from davidxl 2010-11-08 08:18:31 UTC --- The revised patch: Index: gcc/tree-vrp.c === --- gcc/tree-vrp.c(revision 166426) +++ gcc/tree-vrp.c(working copy) @

[Bug middle-end/45505] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr25923.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 CC|

[Bug fortran/46356] [OOP] Erroneous procedure/intent error and ICE for class dummy argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46356 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/45971] [4.6 Regression] ice in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug fortran/46344] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] ICE with allocatable CLASS components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344 --- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 09:04:03 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Mon Nov 8 09:03:50 2010 New Revision: 166430 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166430 Log: 2010-11-08 Janus Weil PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/46344] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] ICE with allocatable CLASS components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344 --- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 09:20:48 UTC --- r166430 fixes the test cases in comment #0 and #4 and the one in PR 46345. However, the problem in comment #5 persists. Reduced test case: module m type t1 end type

[Bug bootstrap/46358] New: i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure in r166429

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358 Summary: i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure in r166429 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo:

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-08 09:30:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > Last patch: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg00052.html Review comments by Ian Taylor were: * More macros now refer to magic variables which m

[Bug fortran/46356] [OOP] Erroneous procedure/intent error and ICE for class dummy argument

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46356 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 09:32:26 UTC --- Reduced test case: IMPLICIT NONE TYPE :: ParentVector INTEGER :: a END TYPE ParentVector CONTAINS SUBROUTINE vector_operation(pvec) CLASS(Par

[Bug bootstrap/46358] i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure in r166429

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Bug middle-end/44206] [4.6 Regression] ICE: Inline clone with address taken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44206 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/46170] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] g++ wrongly rejects pointer-to-member in template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46170 --- Comment #21 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-08 10:16:19 UTC --- "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" writes: > --- Comment #19 from Jason Merrill 2010-11-02 > 16:36:01 UTC --- > I think we can avoid the extra patch for 4.4 by just removing the code tha

[Bug c++/46156] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11370 with -frounding-math

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46156 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08 10:35:27 UTC --- And apparently went away in http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166167 Guess we just want to add the testcase into the testsuite, unless the r166167 change would only make

[Bug bootstrap/46358] [4.6 Regression] i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure in r166429

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/46357] Unnecessary movzx instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46357 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-08 10:44:31 UTC --- We always use zero/sign-extending moves to avoid partial register stalls.

[Bug tree-optimization/46355] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in create_preheader (cfgloopmanip.c:1336) with -O -fstrict-overflow -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46355 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug target/28627] [cygwin/mingw32] Missing dllimport diagnostic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28627 --- Comment #1 from Kai Tietz 2010-11-08 10:49:44 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Mon Nov 8 10:49:38 2010 New Revision: 166431 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166431 Log: 2010-11-08 Kai Tietz PR target/28627

[Bug c++/46156] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in tsubst_copy, at cp/pt.c:11370 with -frounding-math

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46156 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse 2010-11-08 11:01:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > And apparently went away in > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166167 > Guess we just want to add the testcase into the testsuite, unless the r

[Bug c++/45399] [C++0x] Warning for \0 in raw strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399 --- Comment #2 from Kay Hayen 2010-11-08 11:03:31 UTC --- Created attachment 22319 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22319 Warning for \0 in raw strings test case Well, here it is. Use like this: g++ -c -std=c++0x raw.c++ Bes

[Bug libstdc++/46359] New: [4.6 Regression] symbol missing from 4.6 libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46359 Summary: [4.6 Regression] symbol missing from 4.6 libstdc++ Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assig

[Bug libstdc++/46359] [4.6 Regression] symbol missing from 4.6 libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46359 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64-*-linux, |

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-08 11:27:33 UTC --- As usual this might be as well a type-merging problem in the Frontend.

[Bug libstdc++/46359] [4.6 Regression] symbol missing from 4.6 libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46359 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-08 11:37:21 UTC --- is this Bug 46221 ?

[Bug other/46333] problems with configure -enable-build-with-cxx -disable-bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333 --- Comment #19 from Jay 2010-11-08 11:50:35 UTC --- Hey, g++ 4.0 doesn't even like all of the code. You have to try "all targets" to uncover some of it. target=alpha-dec-vms: g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -W -Wall -Ww

[Bug libstdc++/46359] [4.6 Regression] symbol missing from 4.6 libstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46359 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/46221] [4.6 Regression] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/46358] [4.6 Regression] i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure in r166429

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358 --- Comment #2 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2010-11-08 11:56:09 UTC --- Created attachment 22320 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22320 List of unexpected failures

[Bug bootstrap/46358] [4.6 Regression] i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure in r166429

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Priority|P1

[Bug middle-end/46221] [4.6 Regression] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 --- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-08 12:03:23 UTC --- I will investigate this a bit now.

[Bug middle-end/46360] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE in release_defs, at tree-ssanames.c:313

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in release_defs, at tree-ssanames.c:313 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug target/46208] redundant extensions of argument registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-08 12:15:02 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Mon Nov 8 12:14:51 2010 New Revision: 166433 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166433 Log: PR target/46208 * config/sparc/sparc.c

[Bug middle-end/46360] [4.6 Regression] ICE in release_defs, at tree-ssanames.c:313

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/46358] [4.6 Regression] i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure in r166429

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/45399] [C++0x] Warning for \0 in raw strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever Confirmed|1

[Bug c++/45399] [C++0x] Warning for \0 in raw strings

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45399 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-08 12:26:16 UTC --- The motivating examples in the original raw strings proposal are for simplifying regular expressions and HTML markup, there's no mention of binary blobs. http://www.open-std.org/jtc1

[Bug web/46361] New: bugzilla: mid-air collision message is misleading

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46361 Summary: bugzilla: mid-air collision message is misleading Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web AssignedTo:

[Bug bootstrap/46362] New: [4.6 regression] lto-plugin.c doesn't compile on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362 Summary: [4.6 regression] lto-plugin.c doesn't compile on IRIX 6.5 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug web/46363] New: [bugzilla] WAITING state confirms bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46363 Summary: [bugzilla] WAITING state confirms bug Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web AssignedTo: unassig...@g

[Bug target/46191] [4.5/4.6 regression] Non-absolute names in libgcc_s.so

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46191 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug other/46333] problems with configure -enable-build-with-cxx -disable-bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46333 --- Comment #20 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-08 13:12:11 UTC --- There really is absolutely no point experimenting with this option anywhere other than on trunk. Maybe we should just disable it on 4.5 branch; it's a GCC-developer

[Bug c++/46364] New: basic_string.h:541:32: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364 Summary: basic_string.h:541:32: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/46221] [4.6 Regression] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug c++/45383] [4.5/4.6 Regression] Implicit conversion to pointer does no longer automatically generate operator== and operator!=.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383 Simon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||number.cruncher at ntlworld |

[Bug fortran/46344] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] ICE with allocatable CLASS components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug bootstrap/46365] New: [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46365 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassig..

[Bug bootstrap/46365] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46365 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/46221] [4.6 Regression] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 --- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-08 14:18:29 UTC --- Created attachment 22323 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22323 patch Patch. Testing on x86_64-linux, testing elsewhere is appreciated.

[Bug rtl-optimization/46366] New: gcc.target/i386/pr45352-2.c failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366 Summary: gcc.target/i386/pr45352-2.c failed Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unas

[Bug c++/45894] [4.5/4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: segmentation fault with -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894 --- Comment #5 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-08 14:27:46 UTC --- I think the example is invalid in c++ 2003 as [temp.param/9] says that a function template shall not have any default template argument. It's valid in c++0x though as that rule has be

[Bug bootstrap/46365] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46365 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/46358] [4.6 Regression] i686-pc-linux-gnu bootstrap failure in r166429

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46358 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from

[Bug middle-end/46221] [4.6 Regression] huge number of c++ testsuite failures, libstdc++.so alias missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46221 --- Comment #14 from Peter Bergner 2010-11-08 14:36:32 UTC --- I'll give it a spin on powerpc64-linux.

[Bug tree-optimization/46367] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE during cgraph edge cloning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE during cgraph edge cloning Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization As

[Bug tree-optimization/46367] [4.6 Regression] ICE during cgraph edge cloning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target|

[Bug fortran/46344] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] ICE with allocatable CLASS components

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46344 --- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-08 14:39:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > The error seems to be sensitive to the first letter of the type(t1) variable. > All names starting with 'w'-'z' fail, others seem to work. Also th

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08 14:39:51 UTC --- The problem seems to be that on the c.f90: ... D.1548.i.data = 0B; atmp.7.dtype = 3113; atmp.7.dim[0].stride = 1; atmp.7.dim[0].lbound = 0; atmp.7.dim[0].ubound = 1; D.169

[Bug middle-end/46368] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1033

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1033 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/46368] [4.6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1033

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug middle-end/46360] [4.6 Regression] ICE in release_defs, at tree-ssanames.c:313

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46360 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46369] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression '((unsigned char*)&*r)[24]' of kind bit_field_ref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression '((unsigned char*)&*r)[24]' of kind bit_field_ref Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid

[Bug c++/46369] [4.6 Regression] ICE: unexpected expression '((unsigned char*)&*r)[24]' of kind bit_field_ref

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46369 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/46367] [4.6 Regression] ICE during cgraph edge cloning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/46370] New: [OOP] ALLOCATE: Error allocating CLASS coarrays

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46370 Summary: [OOP] ALLOCATE: Error allocating CLASS coarrays Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug tree-optimization/46367] [4.6 Regression] ICE during cgraph edge cloning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-08 15:02:02 UTC --- Created attachment 22326 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22326 preprocessed source Hm, it seems initial attachment doesn't work.

[Bug tree-optimization/46367] [4.6 Regression] ICE during cgraph edge cloning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46367 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever Confirmed|1

[Bug fortran/46371] New: [OOP] SELECT TYPE: scalar coarray variable is rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46371 Summary: [OOP] SELECT TYPE: scalar coarray variable is rejected Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/46372] New: format '%f' expects type 'double', but argument 3 has type 'float'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46372 Summary: format '%f' expects type 'double', but argument 3 has type 'float' Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08 15:21:41 UTC --- Indeed, for x: (mem/s:DI (reg/f:DI 117 [ D.1692 ]) [6 MEM[(struct a[2] *)D.1692_63]+0 S8 A64]) mem: (mem/s/f/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame) (const_int -384 [0xfe

[Bug middle-end/46368] [4.6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1033

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46368 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-08 15:32:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Indeed, for > x: > (mem/s:DI (reg/f:DI 117 [ D.1692 ]) [6 MEM[(struct a[2] *)D.1692_63]+0 S8 > A64]) > mem: > (mem/s/f/c:DI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 20 frame)

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug libfortran/46373] New: fflush called when reading from a string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373 Summary: fflush called when reading from a string Product: gcc Version: 4.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unas

[Bug c/46374] New: Add nooverflow attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46374 Summary: Add nooverflow attribute Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08 15:38:21 UTC --- Ah, if (optimize) update_alias_info_with_stack_vars (); explains that. Guess it should be if (optimize || ...). if (optimize || flag_strict_aliasing) would work for this testcas

[Bug c/35649] Incorrect printf warning: expect double has float

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35649 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||corsepiu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/46372] format '%f' expects type 'double', but argument 3 has type 'float'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46372 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/46374] Add nooverflow attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46374 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2010-11-08 15:41:30 UTC --- That code is really: bool f (uint16_t x, uint16_t y) { return ((int)x) + 8 == ((int)y) - 17; } --- CUT --- There should be no zero extends in that code because the ABI requires the

[Bug c/46374] Add nooverflow attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46374 --- Comment #2 from Luís Fernando Schultz Xavier da Silveira 2010-11-08 15:48:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > That code is really: > bool > f (uint16_t x, uint16_t y) > { > return ((int)x) + 8 == ((int)y) - 17; > } I am very sorry. I forg

[Bug tree-optimization/45948] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use (tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:1242) with -O -fstrict-overflow -ftree-loop-distribution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45948 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug debug/46375] New: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -fgcse -fno-tree-dominator-opts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46375 Summary: [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -fgcse -fno-tree-dominator-opts Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/46208] redundant extensions of argument registers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46208 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 2010-11-08 16:04:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > * config/sparc/sparc.c (TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES): Delete. I was just looking into the same problem with MIPS too. I almost think TARGET_PROMOTE_PROTOT

[Bug fortran/45636] Failed to fold simple Fortran string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

--disable-threads --disable-target-libiberty --disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --build=hppa-linux-gnu --host=hppa-linux-gnu --target=hppa64-linux-gnu --enable-languages=c --disable-bootstrap Thread model: single gcc version 4.6.0 20101108 (experimental) [trunk revision 166433] (GCC) I get the

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #10

[Bug target/43808] [4.6 Regression] -fipa-reference -fschedule-insns -fstrict-aliasing causes two gfortran check failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43808 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08 16:39:39 UTC --- Created attachment 22329 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22329 gcc46-pr43808-2.patch Another possible fix (also untested).

[Bug lto/46376] New: LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes don't work together

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46376 Summary: LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes don't work together Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970 --- Comment #95 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-11-08 17:00:41 UTC --- > CC fs/ioctl.o > fs/ioctl.c: In function 'do_vfs_ioctl': > fs/ioctl.c:601:1: internal compiler error: in update_df, at fwprop.c:877 > Please submit a full bug r

[Bug libfortran/46373] fflush called when reading from a string

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46373 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46366] gcc.target/i386/pr45352-2.c failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366 --- Comment #1 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-11-08 17:05:38 UTC --- Sorry, I have checked that the test doesn't ICE but missed the additional warnings. How about the below patch, do you think it makes sense? I have verified that the test still I

[Bug lto/46376] LTO, MinGW and virtual base classes don't work together

--enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-multilib=no --with-system-zlib=yes --enable-threads --disable-nls --with-arch-32=i686 --disable-sjlj-exceptions Thread model: win32 gcc version 4.6.0 20101108 (experimental) (GCC) *** File: test.h #ifndef TEST_H_INCLUDED #define TEST_H_INCLUDED struct VBase

[Bug target/46357] Unnecessary movzx instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46357 --- Comment #2 from Justin Lebar 2010-11-08 17:08:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > We always use zero/sign-extending moves to avoid partial register stalls. Sure, but the whole instruction on line 10 is unnecessary.

[Bug rtl-optimization/46366] gcc.target/i386/pr45352-2.c failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46366 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-08 17:13:24 UTC --- The testcase looks invalid to me: static bitstream_init (picture_t * picture, void *start) { picture->bitstream_ptr = start; } ... xine_xvmc_t * xvmc = bitstream_init (picture, buffer);

[Bug c++/46364] basic_string.h:541:32: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970 --- Comment #96 from Mikael Pettersson 2010-11-08 17:24:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #88) > I also tested the patch on armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi. The ICE in > function '__popcountsi2' is still there, so this must be a separate issue. I

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970 --- Comment #97 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-08 17:30:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #96) > (In reply to comment #88) > > I also tested the patch on armv5tejl-unknown-linux-gnueabi. The ICE in > > function '__popcountsi2' is still there, so this must b

[Bug c++/45894] [4.5/4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: segmentation fault with -Wall

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-08 17:40:15 UTC --- Created attachment 22331 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22331 gcc46-pr45894.patch Ok, I'll bootstrapp/regtest this then.

  1   2   >