[Bug fortran/45827] mio_component_ref(): Component not found when mixing f90 and f03 in large projects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827 --- Comment #11 from Hans-Werner Boschmann 2010-09-30 07:37:46 UTC --- So it works with 4.6.0 20100924, but it still doesn't work with 4.6.0 20100921. Unfortunately, I cannot use the latest revision, until bug 45746 is fixed. Plus, I assume that t

[Bug c++/45829] Unary minus on static const class variable triggering linker error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45829 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-09-30 08:10:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > > But -a (or 0.0-a) is not a constant expression, so having an in-class > initializer seems suspicious, couldn't we warn at least? Eh? It could be used

[Bug c/45054] [4.6 Regression] struct-by-value-1.c fail.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45054 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 David Krauss changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #2 from David Krauss 2010-09-30 08:30:09 UTC --- Well, that's almost certainly my fault, because that patch directly implements that testcase. However, I can't reproduce it, even after updating and rebuilding the compiler. I'm new he

[Bug objc/45842] New: New obj(c-c++) failures

of expected passes7020 # of unexpected failures20 # of unexpected successes2 # of expected failures61 # of unresolved testcases2 # of unsupported tests67 /opt/gcc/build_w/gcc/xgcc version 4.6.0 20100930 (experimental) [trunk revision 164743p2] (GCC) =

[Bug target/45790] [4.6 Regression] rs6000 builtin vs LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45790 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-09-30 08:45:26 UTC --- On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45790 > > Andrew Pinski changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug objc/45842] New obj(c-c++) failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45842 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/45352] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7058

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352 --- Comment #10 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-09-30 08:50:14 UTC --- Are you sure you have applied the right patch? With the patch from comment #7, the test doesn't fail for me, and moreover there is no assert on line 7077. I'm attaching the pat

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC|paolo.carlini at oracle dot | |com

[Bug objc/36580] ICE at -O2 and above (with strict aliasing) with invalid Objective-C code.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36580 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug bootstrap/45612] [4.6 regression] Reference to undefined label building libada on Solaris 2/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45612 --- Comment #17 from hainque at adacore dot com 2010-09-30 09:23:25 UTC --- ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Eric, Olivier, > could you please have a look at Jan's question in Comment #6? This > bug currently breaks Ada bootstrap on Solaris 2/SPA

[Bug fortran/45827] mio_component_ref(): Component not found when mixing f90 and f03 in large projects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827 --- Comment #12 from Tobias Burnus 2010-09-30 09:24:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > So it works with 4.6.0 20100924, but it still doesn't work with 4.6.0 > 20100921. > Unfortunately, I cannot use the latest revision, until bug 45746 is fi

[Bug objc/45842] New obj(c-c++) failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45842 --- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe 2010-09-30 09:40:14 UTC --- Author: iains Date: Thu Sep 30 09:40:11 2010 New Revision: 164747 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164747 Log: PR objc/45842 * objc.dg/threedotthree-abi-1.

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #4 from David Krauss 2010-09-30 09:52:48 UTC --- Ah, I didn't even notice the target line before. This is unbuffered I/O, which can be challenging to the codecvt. But this isn't a failure I would anticipate. If the codecvt fails, the

[Bug rtl-optimization/45813] [4.4/4.5 Regression] alias analysis problem with -mthumb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45813 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias, wrong-code Target|A

[Bug objc/45842] New obj(c-c++) failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45842 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug fortran/45748] [4.5/4.6 Regression] -fimplicit-none failures when using intrinsic MAX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45748 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/45758] [4.6 Regression] ICE in expr_invariant_in_loop_p

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45758 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/45764] [4.6 Regression] wrong code -O2 vs -O3 (problem in vectorizer???)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45764 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug objc/45842] New obj(c-c++) failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45842 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe 2010-09-30 10:14:23 UTC --- Sendinggcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/const-str-12.mm Sendinggcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/const-str-7.mm Sendinggcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/method-22.mm Sendinggcc/tes

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #6 from David Krauss 2010-09-30 10:15:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Challenging to the codecvt?!? Isn't this a *char* testcase? Oh, my bad. I thought constraint_filebuf included that automatically. Guess not. I've got codecvt

[Bug tree-optimization/45781] [4.6 Regression] GCC incorrectly puts function in .text.unlikely

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45781 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/45788] [4.6 Regression] -fwhole-program causes ICE error: BB 3 can not throw but has an EH edge

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45788 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-apple-darwin10.4.0 --- Comment

[Bug fortran/45794] [4.6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_procedure_call

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45794 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug bootstrap/45796] [4.6 regression] make targets info-gcc, dvi-gcc etc. should work from unbuilt configured tree

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45796 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-09-30 10:24:25 UTC --- Did it really work in 4.5? Thus, why's this a regression?

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2010-09-30 10:24:49 UTC --- After this message I will not be in CC anymore. I'm sorry, I'm getting too many distracting messages and cannot help much here anyway, at least not at this time.

[Bug bootstrap/45801] [4.6 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45801 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/45830] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Code+rodata increase with -ftree-switch-conversion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45830 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug driver/45703] [4.6 regression] --help -v no longer shows linker help

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45703 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/45700] [4.5/4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=fold bootstrap failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45700 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, ice-checking Priority

[Bug tree-optimization/45656] [4.6 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45656 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/42159] unwinding issues on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42159 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6] app SIGABRTs |unwinding issues on darwin

[Bug target/45843] New: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] __builtin_va_arg overwrites into adjacent stack location

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45843 Summary: [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] __builtin_va_arg overwrites into adjacent stack location Product: gcc Version: 4.3.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug target/45843] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] __builtin_va_arg overwrites into adjacent stack location

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45843 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/45843] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] __builtin_va_arg overwrites into adjacent stack location

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45843 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu|x86_64-linux Known to work|

[Bug target/45843] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] __builtin_va_arg overwrites into adjacent stack location

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45843 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/45819] [4.5 Regression] unexpected unaligned access to volatile int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45819 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.2

[Bug c/32511] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] GCC rejects inline+weak function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc d

[Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to fail|

[Bug rtl-optimization/45352] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7058

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352 --- Comment #12 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-09-30 11:03:51 UTC --- Yes, sorry, I applied correct patch, but pasted assert from unpatched r164716: The correct assert is: $ FLAGS="-O1 -freorder-blocks -fschedule-insns2 -funswitch-loops -fselective-sch

[Bug target/39725] [4.5/4.6 Regression][cond-optab] MIPS pessimizations on floating-point

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39725 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenthe

[Bug target/40959] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] FreeBSD/ia64 build fails: No rule to make target `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc/crtfastmath.o', needed by `T_TARGET'.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40959 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/40974] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] cannot build gcc-4.4.1: fenv_t has not been declared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40974 --- Comment #50 from Richard Guenther 2010-09-30 11:09:47 UTC --- So, is this fixed anywhere?

[Bug debug/45447] ICE with `-g -femit-struct-debug-baseonly'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45447 Yao Qi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qiyao at gcc dot gnu.org Known to fail|

[Bug target/41156] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] zlib segfault in inflate_table() compiled w/ -O -msse2 ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41156 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/42954] [4.5/4.6 regression] TARGET_*_CPP_BUILDINS issues with gfortran

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/43959] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-cproj-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43959 --- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther 2010-09-30 11:19:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #18) > Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-cproj-1.c -O1 > (test for excess errors) > > > Ah. The following fixes it for me on a cr

[Bug c/45831] 0 = 10 (with -O0, 0 = 0 with -O1, but 10 = 10 expected)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45831 --- Comment #10 from Michiel 2010-09-30 11:23:58 UTC --- To get to know what a formula does, I usually compute some examples. When doing so, I was warned, but ignored them and that was stupid. There are however also warnings that are stupid. I n

[Bug target/45325] [4.6 Regression] target attribute doesn't work with -march=i586

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, |

[Bug c/45831] 0 = 10 (with -O0, 0 = 0 with -O1, but 10 = 10 expected)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45831 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab 2010-09-30 11:33:54 UTC --- -1 works for any integer type, ~0 only works for unsigned (int|short|char).

[Bug bootstrap/45381] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap failure for powerpc-apple-darwin9: error: AltiVec argument passed to unprototyped function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug rtl-optimization/45394] [4.6 regression] gnat fails to build on s390, trunk 20100918

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45394 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug middle-end/45505] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr25923.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Component|fortran

[Bug ada/45568] [4.6 Regression] stack overflow (or erroneous memory access) building gnattools

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45568 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug rtl-optimization/45570] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in cfg_preds_1, at sel-sched-ir.c:4584

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45570 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 --- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2010-09-30 11:46:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Or do you guys happen to have a setup I can ssh into? :v) Nominally, you *could* repeat my findings with a cross-compiler setup as described by

[Bug target/45585] [4.6 Regression] ICE on powerpc-apple-darwin9 for gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_2.f90 with -O2 -m64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45585 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |powerpc64-*-*, |

[Bug lto/45586] [4.6 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking AssignedTo|unassi

[Bug bootstrap/45658] [4.6 regression] Comparison failure in gcc/ada/ali.o on Solaris 2/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45658 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #7 from Richard Gu

[Bug tree-optimization/45844] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr45714-b.f -O (internal compiler error)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45844 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/pr45714-b.f -O (internal compiler error) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug c/45831] 0 = 10 (with -O0, 0 = 0 with -O1, but 10 = 10 expected)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45831 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug lto/45667] [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: type mismatch in address expression with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45667 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking AssignedTo|unassi

[Bug target/45693] [4.6 regression] All Tru64 UNIX EH tests fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45693 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug target/45701] [4.6 Regression] Fail to prefer using r3 for padding a push/pop multiple to 8-byte alignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45701 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c/45831] 0 = 10 (with -O0, 0 = 0 with -O1, but 10 = 10 expected)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45831 --- Comment #13 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-09-30 12:12:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > To get to know what a formula does, I usually compute some examples. When > doing > so, I was warned, but ignored them and that was stupid. > > The

[Bug lto/45721] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:673 with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45721 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/45732] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in bit_value_unop, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:1861 at -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45732 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/45743] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/whole_file_3.f90 ICE: verify_stmts failed: invalid conversion in gimple call with -finline-small-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45743 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Priority|P3

[Bug libstdc++/45841] [4.6 Regression]: r164529 cris-elf libstdc++ 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45841 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug lto/45702] [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45702 --- Comment #20 from Richard Guenther 2010-09-30 12:22:41 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Sep 30 12:22:33 2010 New Revision: 164749 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164749 Log: 2010-09-30 Richard Guenther PR testsu

[Bug rtl-optimization/45394] [4.6 regression] gnat fails to build on s390, trunk 20100918

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45394 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2010-09-30 13:00:38 UTC --- For the records, I have a reduced testcase and a patch. ETA is next week.

[Bug fortran/45827] mio_component_ref(): Component not found when mixing f90 and f03 in large projects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827 --- Comment #13 from Hans-Werner Boschmann 2010-09-30 13:03:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > Actually, I am confused: From that comment it sounds as if 20100921 does not > have the bug 45746 - but it has been reported using 20100921 and a co

[Bug tree-optimization/43959] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/builtin-cproj-1.c -O1 (test for excess errors)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43959 --- Comment #20 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-09-30 13:13:05 UTC --- > > > Ah. The following fixes it for me on a cross. Can you bootstrap & > > > regtest and > > > install it? It's pre-approved if it works for you. > > > > Will tes

[Bug c++/45845] New: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE regressed on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45845 Summary: g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE regressed on darwin Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/45845] g++.dg/ext/visibility/anon6.C scan-assembler 1BIiE1cE regressed on darwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45845 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2010-09-30 13:47:26 UTC --- Caused by... Author: rguenth Date: Wed Sep 29 13:59:08 2010 New Revision: 164719 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164719 Log: 2010-09-29 Richard Guenther

[Bug fortran/45827] mio_component_ref(): Component not found when mixing f90 and f03 in large projects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45827 --- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus 2010-09-30 13:48:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > But I have run valgrind now. It was the first time, so I don't understand the > result. Is it somehow the fault of my hardware/OS? Here is the output: > v

[Bug tree-optimization/45704] [4.5 Regression] load byte instruction is used for volatile int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45704 --- Comment #8 from Atsushi Nemoto 2010-09-30 13:59:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > The PR 42956 bugzilla shows same fix was applied to both 4.5.0 and 4.4.4, > but they behave differently on this test case. > > Comparing patches for 4.4 br

[Bug tree-optimization/45704] [4.5 Regression] load byte instruction is used for volatile int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45704 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-09-30 14:14:13 UTC --- On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, anemo at mba dot ocn.ne.jp wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45704 > > --- Comment #8 from Atsushi Nemoto 2010-09-30 > 13:59:34 U

[Bug fortran/45828] [4.6 Regression] No default initialization of derived type members?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45828 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|una

[Bug rtl-optimization/38644] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Optimization flag -O1 -fschedule-insns2 causes wrong code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644 --- Comment #32 from Sebastian Huber 2010-09-30 15:36:02 UTC --- Which target milestone do you intend for a fix? It is still present in 4.6.0 20100925.

[Bug fortran/39427] F2003: Procedures with same name as types/type constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39427 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #20

[Bug c/32511] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] GCC rejects inline+weak function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32511 --- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2010-09-30 16:01:01 UTC --- I don't see it as different at all; I am arguing that the initial bug report was not actually a bug, and that the patch should be reverted.

[Bug bootstrap/42628] ICE during bootstrap when compiling several libsupc++ files: original tree changed by fold

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42628 Artem Anisimov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aanisimov at inbox dot ru --- Comment #1

[Bug bootstrap/42628] ICE during bootstrap when compiling several libsupc++ files: original tree changed by fold

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42628 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug tree-optimization/45781] [4.6 Regression] GCC incorrectly puts function in .text.unlikely

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45781 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2010-09-30 16:44:17 UTC --- IA-64 seems to be fine with unlikely section at least at our periodic tester setup, otherwise SPEC2000 FDO testing would break. So it might be specific for ia64 HP-UX and in that case in

[Bug c++/45845] g++.dg/pubtypes.C scan-assembler "A\\\\\\\\0"+[ \\t]+[#;@]+[\\t]+external name

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45845 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2010-09-30 17:02:29 UTC --- The failing testcase was introduced with the proposed patch... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg00438.html that added the ability to generate the DWARF pubtypes section on

[Bug target/45837] [4.6 Regression] Global options changes on Sept. 29th, breaks powerpc linux64 build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45837 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 Summary|Global options c

[Bug bootstrap/45801] [4.6 regression] powerpc64-linux bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45801 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||45837 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug lto/45810] 40% slowdown when using LTO for a single-file program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45810 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-09-30 17:28:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Using -fno-inline-functions, the program recovers the speed of the no-LTO > version. This does not work on powerpc-apple-darwin9: [karma] lin/test%

[Bug web/45846] New: Partial attachments in bugzilla

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45846 Summary: Partial attachments in bugzilla Product: gcc Version: 4.3.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: web AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o

[Bug web/45846] Partial attachments in bugzilla

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45846 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/45781] [4.6 Regression] GCC incorrectly puts function in .text.unlikely

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45781 --- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey 2010-09-30 17:41:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > The decision is reasonable (I suppose partial inlining will inline the > if (!init) case) as the function is called exactly once then and thus > should be opt

[Bug bootstrap/45700] [4.5/4.6 Regression] --enable-checking=fold bootstrap failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45700 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez 2010-09-30 17:47:19 UTC --- If we call build[1-5] just to call protected_set_expr_location next, then by all means, use build[1-5]_loc and be done with it. Ideally we should strive to set location information i

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/45781] [4.6 Regression] GCC incorrectly puts function in .text.unlikely

Hi, please, can you add the testcase to PR? I guess problem might be that as the function is split and then inlined back together the profile gets confused... Honza

[Bug tree-optimization/45781] [4.6 Regression] GCC incorrectly puts function in .text.unlikely

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45781 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2010-09-30 17:47:39 UTC --- Hi, please, can you add the testcase to PR? I guess problem might be that as the function is split and then inlined back together the profile gets confused... Honza

[Bug bootstrap/45658] [4.6 regression] Comparison failure in gcc/ada/ali.o on Solaris 2/SPARC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45658 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/45781] [4.6 Regression] GCC incorrectly puts function in .text.unlikely

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45781 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2010-09-30 18:21:29 UTC --- I think I am hitting instance of PR45846. I get just part of the testcase: typedef union tree_node *tree; struct tree_exp { tree operands[1]; }; union tree_node { struct tree_exp exp; }

  1   2   >