http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45700
--- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-09-30 17:47:19 UTC --- If we call build[1-5] just to call protected_set_expr_location next, then by all means, use build[1-5]_loc and be done with it. Ideally we should strive to set location information if we know it, so I think Jakub's second approach of setting the locus if different (with a copy_node) is a good one. However, if memory usage goes up too much, perhaps we should re-think this, or ignore the locus as suggested.
