--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 08:20 ---
patch applied:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01071.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-01/msg00529.html
--
amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #11 from FBergemann at web dot de 2010-01-20 08:39 ---
Hi Paolo,
here's the response from HP:
> I kindly would like to ask you for confirmation of the problem.
> Because i want to exclude that the problem is just due to
--- Comment #12 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 10:34
---
Frank, to be honest, you are *boring*. I'm adding 3.4.6 to Know to fail, I
think this is the right thing to do. To be clear, I'm not paying further
attention to your messages here, involving a completely obsol
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42811
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 10:49 ---
Appearantly not a duplicate.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 11:08 ---
Subject: Bug 42803
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 20 11:08:24 2010
New Revision: 156069
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156069
Log:
PR middle-end/42803
* varasm.c (narrowing_initial
--- Comment #8 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 11:28 ---
Subject: Bug 42803
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 20 11:27:49 2010
New Revision: 156070
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156070
Log:
PR middle-end/42803
* varasm.c (narrowing_initial
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 11:28 ---
Subject: Bug 42786
Author: uros
Date: Wed Jan 20 11:27:49 2010
New Revision: 156071
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156071
Log:
PR bootstrap/42786
* config.gcc (i[34567]86-*-*): F
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 11:42 ---
mgrid now miscompares on i?86 ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41879
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 11:58 ---
Subject: Bug 21769
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 20 11:57:44 2010
New Revision: 156075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156075
Log:
2010-01-20 Janis Johnson
Paolo Carlini
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 12:04
---
Done.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 12:09 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 12:30 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 12:30 ---
Subject: Bug 42717
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 20 12:30:15 2010
New Revision: 156076
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156076
Log:
2010-01-20 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 13:06 ---
Subject: Bug 41826
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 20 13:06:40 2010
New Revision: 156078
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156078
Log:
2010-01-20 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 13:07 ---
Subject: Bug 41826
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 20 13:07:41 2010
New Revision: 156079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156079
Log:
2010-01-20 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 13:08 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 13:12
---
Ok, let's close this one as fixed...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 13:16
---
Jon, what do you think, shall we go ahead with this one too?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42201
--- Comment #11 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-01-20 13:58 ---
the man pages still have problems with escape codes used (prefix backslashes);
I didn't build and run the check tool yet again.
Matthias
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42460
--- Comment #12 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 14:00
---
Ok, let's re-open to be safe: please provide as soon as possible to Benjamin
the information he needs...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Ad
--- Comment #7 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2010-01-20 14:38
---
I was going to ask you the same thing :-)
I would like to update for 4.5, I'll send the patch when I get home in
a few hours
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42201
--- Comment #9 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 14:42 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35418#c8
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41879
--- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 14:46
---
Great.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42201
--- Comment #13 from FBergemann at web dot de 2010-01-20 15:00 ---
Hi paolo.carl...@oracle.com,
the funny thing about your last comment is, that the company i am working for
is selling quite successfully large systems with adjunct big oracle database
cluster systems to Tier-1 operators.
--- Comment #10 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 15:25 ---
Is there an alt.src for this from SPEC?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41879
--- Comment #3 from uramakrishna at gmail dot com 2010-01-20 15:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=19666)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19666&action=view)
Reduced test case for this PR
We (Tobias, Li and Ramakrishna) have reduced the test case further. This file
show
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-01-20 15:31 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] 172.mgrid
regression, vectorizer prevents predictive commoning
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #10 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-
--- Comment #9 from tony3 at GarlandConsulting dot us 2010-01-20 15:42
---
I am reopening this bug if only because I'd like to get a response to my
previous comments.
I can appreciated that, in your view, the compiler is 'technically correct' in
making the assumption that it need not
--- Comment #10 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 15:48
---
Too bad, yes.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
grosser at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |grosser at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-01-20
16:37 ---
Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] ICE in function_and_variable_visibility breaks
Ada bootstrap
> --- Comment #20 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2010-01-18 12:57 ---
> Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] ICE i
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 17:40
---
Patches welcome to add diagnostics to the C++ frontend.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42810
On i686-pc-linux-gnu, seven libstdc++-v3 symbols are missing when configuring
with --enable-build-with-cxx.
For x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, it's 53 vs. 46 missing symbols, i.e. again
seven more missing symbols for --enable-build-with-cxx.
Take for example:
__gnu_parallel::_Settings::get()
In the or
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 18:42
---
Is this issue related to PR36101?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42813
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 18:43 ---
libstdc++ configure issue.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|paolo dot carlini at oracle |unassigned at gcc dot gnu
|dot com
--- Comment #3 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 18:49 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Is this issue related to PR36101?
Yes, if PR36101 was fixed, I'd expect this problem to go away.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42813
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 18:51
---
Let's add an SH maintainer in CC...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 18:53
---
Only RMs may change regression priority.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 18:54
---
Let's add in CC a couple of build machinery maintainers, maybe we can get some
help...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 18:59
---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] ICE with pointer-to-member-function
> argument in template function
>
> On 01/10/2010 06:42 PM, hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> > In general I am
/usr/local/bin/g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-DMAPNIK_DEBUGinclude -ggdb -O1 -DDEBUG -pg -DMAPNIK_DEBUG
-I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/freetype2
-I/media/NewFoundSpace/2010/01/mapnik/agg/include -I/usr/local/include
-I/usr/include/libxml2 -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/include/cai
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 19:11
---
Please provide all the required information, in particular a pre-processed
file. See this page for details:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#report
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
Wha
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 19:13 ---
Also make sure to include the PCH from the toplevel source file and not from
some header.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42814
--- Comment #3 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-20 19:17
---
Created an attachment (id=19667)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19667&action=view)
precompiled headers
/usr/local/bin/g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
-DMAPNIK_DEBUGinc
--- Comment #4 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-20 19:27
---
Delta compression using up to 4 threads.
Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done.
Writing objects: 100% (3/3), 326 bytes, done.
Total 3 (delta 2), reused 0 (delta 0)
To g...@github.com:h4ck3rm1k3/MapNickAutotoo
--- Comment #5 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-20 19:41
---
Sorry that is not the precompiled header, but the preprocessed,
all you need to get the crash i hope.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42814
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 19:48
---
We are still missing the SVN Rev of the GCC 4.5 you are using and how you built
it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42814
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 20:01 ---
Which GCC version are you using? The preprocessed source does not use
a precompiled header. Compiling the file works ok for me with GCC 4.4.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Remov
--- Comment #8 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-20 20:05
---
got it again after make clean,
maybe it ran out of memory:
mdup...@introspector-desktop:/media/NewFoundSpace/2010/01/mapnik$ gunzip
src/filter_factory.ii.gz
mdup...@introspector-desktop:/media/NewFoundSpace/2
--- Comment #9 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-20 20:09
---
Subject: Re: gcc segfaults on gch
/usr/local/bin/c++ --version
c++ (GCC) 4.5.0 20100113 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:01 PM, rguenth at gcc dot
// This compiled with
// g++ -Wall -Wextra -std=c++0x c.cpp
// c.cpp:5:6: warning: unused parameter x
// c.cpp: In function void func2():
// c.cpp:15:6: warning: unused variable y
#include
void func1(int x)
{
auto f = [&](int j) { return j + x; };
std::cout << f(4) << std
--- Comment #2 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 20:15 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Libstdc++ configuration assumes that libgcc and libgomp have been configured
> and built before libstdc++ configure is run.
>
> This is wrong,
What do you mean with "this is wrong"? Is it
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 20:20
---
That idea of yours Ralf makes perfect sense to me, actually, I was wondering
whether a fix wasn't something like that. Are you willing to go ahead that way?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 20:23
---
*** Bug 42815 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 20:23
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41920 ***
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 20:26
---
Jason, we just got a third duplicate for this issue: if we could do something
about it in time for 4.5.0...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41920
--- Comment #4 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 20:31 ---
Yes, sure. But I would like to know a couple of things first:
Does that mean, when libstdc++ is built in early bootstrap stages (e.g., for
--enable-build-with-cxx), it is not necessary to have libgomp first?
Then, pl
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 20:34
---
Ralf, make sure the submitter of 42813 pays attention to your comments, maybe
add to that audit trail, instead of this one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 20:47
---
With unoptimized trunk I see us blowing the stack during garbage-collecting.
Note that we have a load of templates in this testcase and we walk them in
unfortunate order.
(gdb)
#79368 0x0835b9fb in ggc_collect ()
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #11 from JamesMikeDuPont at googlemail dot com 2010-01-20
20:54 ---
Subject: Re: gcc segfaults on gch
so I am thinking about a way to wrap the existing templates that I use.
there must be a way to reduce the size of the gch by specifing a list
of classes we use. that would
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 21:09
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> Subject: Re: gcc segfaults on gch
>
> so I am thinking about a way to wrap the existing templates that I use.
> there must be a way to reduce the size of the gch by specifing a list
>
--- Comment #15 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 21:12 ---
Suspending since this seems unfixable on systems without __cxa_atexit.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from indy2718 at gmail dot com 2010-01-20 21:15 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41920 ***
>
Sorry,
Using bug search, I had searched for "lambda" and there is another list of bugs
for "lambdas".
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
See the attached world_test_main program.
This was taken from a working program with as much code removed as possible.
$ gnatchop blob.adb
$ gnatmake world_test_main
$ ./world_test_main
test_tasks(1)_000800A50500: waiting to initialize
world_task_000800A0B700: running
main_task_000800
--- Comment #1 from gcc at coreland dot ath dot cx 2010-01-20 21:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=19668)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19668&action=view)
Repro
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42816
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 21:30 ---
Subject: Bug 40750
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 20 21:30:20 2010
New Revision: 156084
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156084
Log:
PR c++/40750
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Clear typ
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 21:30 ---
Subject: Bug 41920
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 20 21:30:28 2010
New Revision: 156085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156085
Log:
PR c++/41920
* semantics.c (build_lambda_object):
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #5 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 21:59 ---
Fixed for 4.5.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIG
--- Comment #2 from laurent at guerby dot net 2010-01-20 21:59 ---
I tested 4.4.1 on x86_64-linux and it seems not to crash:
gue...@gcc13:~/pr42816$ PATH=/opt/cfarm/release/4.4.1/bin:$PATH
gue...@gcc13:~/pr42816$ gnatmake world_test_main.adb
gcc -c world_test_main.adb
gcc -c world_test
--- Comment #6 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 22:00 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 22:11 ---
The patch is OK.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42038
--- Comment #2 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 22:12 ---
Fixed.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 22:15 ---
Subject: Bug 41788
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jan 20 22:14:51 2010
New Revision: 156088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156088
Log:
PR c++/41788
* class.c (layout_class_type): Set p
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from zlogic at gmail dot com 2010-01-20 22:42 ---
Confirmed, I've encountered this bug in 64-bit Windows 7. I've used Qt Creator
1.3.1 (bundled with gc 4.4.0) for building a project which calls OpenMP
functions from inside a pthread.
If I call OpenMP function from main(),
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 22:57 ---
Subject: Bug 42782
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jan 20 22:57:20 2010
New Revision: 156092
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156092
Log:
PR debug/42782
* var-tracking.c: Include tree-flo
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gmx dot de 2010-01-20 23:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=19669)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19669&action=view)
Partial patch for conversion at assignment
A patch that addresses the trivial part of the problem:
the conversions from k
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 23:11 ---
Fixed for 4.5.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIG
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 23:12 ---
Subject: Bug 42038
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jan 20 23:12:25 2010
New Revision: 156094
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156094
Log:
/cp
2010-01-20 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/42038
* e
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-20 23:15
---
Fixed for 4.5.0. Being just an ice-on-invalid will not be fixed in 4_3 / 4_4.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #25 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 23:30
---
Please close this bug if it is fixed.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42691
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 23:32 ---
We accept this testcase with a warning because it is both common and harmless.
In 4.5, this testcase will be accepted with no warning in -std=c++0x mode, as
we now implement DR 757.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot or
--- Comment #18 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 23:36 ---
So, removing the accepts-invalid keyword. I'll fix the diagnostic in 4.6.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #9 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-20 23:38 ---
patch posted as http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-01/msg01126.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42201
--- Comment #26 from jingyu at google dot com 2010-01-20 23:48 ---
This bug is fixed in both trunk(4.5) and 4.4.
I will send a message to gcc-patches when I patch the test case.
--
jingyu at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #10 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 00:02 ---
Subject: Bug 42201
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jan 21 00:01:47 2010
New Revision: 156097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156097
Log:
2010-01-21 Jonathan Wakely
PR libstdc++/42201
--- Comment #11 from redi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 00:06 ---
Fixed. The testcase works if you replace unique_future with future.
--
redi at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 00:42 ---
Subject: Bug 42715
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Jan 21 00:42:02 2010
New Revision: 156102
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156102
Log:
PR debug/42715
* var-tracking.c (use_type): Choos
--- Comment #6 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 00:53 ---
The configuration test can be replaced with some configure / makefile
hackery, but this doesn't help:
he compilation of libstdc++-v3 also depends on the header file:
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag CXX --mode=compile
/us
--- Comment #7 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-21 01:32
---
At this time I don't know --enable-build-with-cxx enough to contribute much to
the solution of the specific issue having to to with that configure option,
just wanted to point out that normal uses of the librar
--- Comment #3 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 01:59 ---
Subject: Bug 42338
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jan 21 01:58:53 2010
New Revision: 156103
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=156103
Log:
PR c++/42338
* mangle.c (write_expression): Handl
[ Don't Panic. There is already a fix for this bug, in fact two, one that is
suitable for our current Stage 3(4?) status but slightly suboptimal, another
that is better but blocked by an existing PR that won't be fixed until next
Stage1. I just figured I should say that first of all. ]
There's a
--- Comment #1 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 03:20 ---
Test results:
clean h...@155967, default test configuration using shared C++ linking:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-01/msg01628.html
clean h...@155967, tested using static C++ linking:
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 03:57 ---
Here's what's going on:
- To implement operator new/delete replacement, we use ld and --wrap to
redirect all references to the operator functions into redirection stubs in the
cygwin dll.
- Each DLL or executable rec
--- Comment #3 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 04:00 ---
Created an attachment (id=19670)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19670&action=view)
Simple stage-3-safe fix
This is the simple fix that is safe for stage 3. By trivially tweaking the
specs, we rem
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
