------- Comment #11 from FBergemann at web dot de  2010-01-20 08:39 -------
Hi Paolo,

here's the response from HP:

----------------------------------------------------
> I kindly would like to ask you for confirmation of the problem.

> Because i want to exclude that the problem is just due to our system

> set-up here.

> I would highly appreciate if you could try to re-produce the problem  

> (see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42791)

> and give us positive or negative confirmation.



I ran the test case from the GCC bug report using GCC 3.4.5 and Boost

1.33.1 and was able to reproduce the problem on my system.



> For decision making about new gcc compiler version to use,

> i would like to ask you for a proposal - especially related to

> performance issues.

> Because there are difference gcc version packages available from your

> download sites.



Generally, I recommend using the most recent GCC version available.



> If you confirm the problem, then it might also be helpful to add the

> information to your web-site, porting guidelines, etc.

> - for all your customers (they might hit the same problem)

> Or ask gnu to fix it.



The FSF is not going to fix anything on the 3.4.* branch, this branch is

considered 'dead' and is no longer being maintained.



[...]
[....@cup.hp.com
----------------------------------------------------

So could you pls. set it to WONTFIX - because WORKSFORME means it works - but
it doesn't. Just for other people facing the same problem again.

We check for new compiler version to use now.

Thanks for your help!

cheers,
Frank


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42791

Reply via email to