--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 08:54 ---
Close as FIXED. Part is fixed in 4.4 (cf. PR 39872), part only on the 4.5
trunk, but for a diagnostic off-by-one bug backporting to 4.4 is not really
worth.
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
W
--- Comment #6 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-23 09:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=18415)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18415&action=view)
Updated patch
This patch is bootstrapped and regression tested.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
On powerpc-apple-darwin9, gcc.target/powerpc/asm-es-2.c fails with
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/asm-es-2.c scan-assembler asm1 3,4
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/asm-es-2.c scan-assembler asm2u 16(3)
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/asm-es-2.c scan-assembler asm3 0(3)
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/asm-e
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-23 09:24 ---
Closing as FIXED. Please reopen if you have any objection.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40671
On powerpc-* gcc.dg/vmx/bug-2.c fails at -O3 -g or -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
with
/opt/gcc/gcc-4.5-work/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vmx/bug-2.c:24:1: internal compiler
error: in build_int_cst_wide, at tree.c:1140
(see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-08/msg02395.html ,
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-23 09:55 ---
Forgot to click the right button!
--
dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 09:46 ---
Subject: Bug 40718
Author: uros
Date: Sun Aug 23 09:46:00 2009
New Revision: 151028
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151028
Log:
PR target/40718
* config/i386/i386.c (*call_pop_1):
--
ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #8 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-08-23 11:09 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> FIXED on the 4.3 branch -> Close.
Minor nit: the commit to 4.3 didn't add the test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40851
--- Comment #8 from slyfox at inbox dot ru 2009-08-23 11:12 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Subject: Bug 40718
>
> Author: uros
> Date: Sun Aug 23 09:46:00 2009
> New Revision: 151028
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151028
> Log:
> PR target/40718
>
--- Comment #9 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-23 11:41 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> This patch fixes for me Dmitry's sample, but does not fix mine. Still
> SIGSEGVs.
> I've managed to
> place whole testcase in one file:
Ah, the same cure should be applied to "*call_value_pop_
--- Comment #10 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-23 11:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=18416)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18416&action=view)
Additional patch
Additional patch to fix call_value_pop_1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40718
--- Comment #11 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-23 12:08 ---
Patched gcc compiles testcase from comment 8 to:
_ZN5Stuff8do_stuffEmm:
.LFB4:
.cfi_startproc
.cfi_personality 0x0,__gxx_personality_v0
pushl %ebp
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
movl%
--- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 12:14 ---
Subject: Bug 40718
Author: uros
Date: Sun Aug 23 12:14:26 2009
New Revision: 151029
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151029
Log:
PR target/40718
* config/i386/i386.c (*call_pop_1)
--- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 12:38 ---
Subject: Bug 40718
Author: uros
Date: Sun Aug 23 12:37:53 2009
New Revision: 151030
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151030
Log:
PR target/40718
* config/i386/i386.c (*call_pop_1)
--- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 13:03 ---
Subject: Bug 40718
Author: uros
Date: Sun Aug 23 13:03:39 2009
New Revision: 151033
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151033
Log:
PR target/40718
* config/i386/i386.c (*call_pop_1)
--- Comment #15 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-23 13:04 ---
Fixed everywhere.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 16:01 ---
Subject: Bug 40851
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Aug 23 16:01:11 2009
New Revision: 151034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151034
Log:
2009-08-23 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/40851
*
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 16:02 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > FIXED on the 4.3 branch -> Close.
> Minor nit: the commit to 4.3 didn't add the test case.
I forgot to do a "svn add" - and I forgot to do a "svn status" to fi
--- Comment #11 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-08-23 16:53 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > (In reply to comment #7)
> > > FIXED on the 4.3 branch -> Close.
> > Minor nit: the commit to 4.3 didn't add the test case.
>
> I forgot to do a "svn add" - and I
When compiling gcc/g++/gfortran 4.5.0 on MAC OS X it crashes with the error
below. I'm using gmp 4.3.1 and mpfr 2.4.1. Compilation of the gcc bundle
version 4.3.4 and 4.4.1 works without problems, which makes me believe that it
is a problem with the gcc 4.5.0 trunk and not with my system configurat
--- Comment #8 from laurent at guerby dot net 2009-08-23 18:03 ---
It now happens on powerpc 32 bits:
/home/guerby/build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/guerby/build/./prev-gcc/
-B/n/53/guerby/install-trunk/powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/n/53/guerby/install-trunk/powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu/bi
--- Comment #20 from schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-08-23 18:19 ---
Fixed in 4.5.0.
--
schwab at linux-m68k dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #13 from schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-08-23 18:25 ---
Fixed in 4.5.0.
--
schwab at linux-m68k dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNC
--- Comment #8 from schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-08-23 18:30 ---
No longer reproducible, assuming fixed.
--
schwab at linux-m68k dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-08-23 18:34 ---
No longer reproducible, assuming fixed.
--
schwab at linux-m68k dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #12 from schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-08-23 18:38 ---
No longer reproducible with 4.4.0, assuming fixed.
--
schwab at linux-m68k dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-08-23 18:40 ---
No longer reproducible with 4.4.0, assuming fixed.
--
schwab at linux-m68k dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-08-23 18:43 ---
No longer reproducible with 4.3.4, assuming fixed.
--
schwab at linux-m68k dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-08-23 18:45 ---
No longer reproducible with 4.3.0, assuming fixed.
--
schwab at linux-m68k dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #12 from schwab at linux-m68k dot org 2009-08-23 18:52 ---
Wontfix for 4.3.
--
schwab at linux-m68k dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|AS
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 19:05 ---
Subject: Bug 10536
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Aug 23 19:05:09 2009
New Revision: 151037
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151037
Log:
2009-08-23 H.J. Lu
PR ld/10536
* Makefile.in (i
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 19:11 ---
hmm, r is not needed on most PPC assemblers (Darwin is the exception). The
testcase should be changed such that it matches both with the r and without.
And maybe even %r too.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org c
--- Comment #4 from mikulas at artax dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
2009-08-23 19:18 ---
The patch works fine.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40983
--- Comment #30 from mikulas at artax dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz
2009-08-23 19:28 ---
I tested the 4.4 patch and it works fine.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40838
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-23 19:55 ---
Is it possible to extend this to address another zero extend bug, PR 17387?
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
There seems to be a bug in the tree dump related to procedure pointer
components ('PPC', a Fortran 2003 feature which would probably be described as
"function pointers as structure components" in C). In particular: When calling
such a PPC, the dump only shows the component name, while the name of t
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 21:15 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> > D.1533 = f (&C.1531, &C.1532);
>
> In principle the 'f' here should be an 'o.f'.
I opened PR 41149 to track this issue.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41139
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41020
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41112
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 01:03
---
I think we should leave this warning out of -Wall. There's a lot of legacy C
code that may do this kind of stuff. In C++, it's always been invalid, and
there's more of an expectation of structured initialization
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 01:04
---
This may very well indicate that PCH is totally busted in 4.5; we need to
figure that out.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40778
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41043
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41086
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41139
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40965
--- Comment #10 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-08-24 02:38
---
No, that looks like a different problem. It affects powerpc64 too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41081
Bug 1:
A segmentation fault(rhs_regno (x=0x0) rtl.h:1005) will come
up if we: delcare function Mibench > automotive_susan_e >
susan.c:susan_edges_small() with __attribute__((optimize(3)))
complete command line and compiler output :
$~/ici/install/bin/gcc -lm -O0 -c susan.c
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 03:42
---
Subject: Bug 37446
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Aug 24 03:41:56 2009
New Revision: 151043
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151043
Log:
2009-08-23 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/37446
--- Comment #2 from rogerdpack at gmail dot com 2009-08-24 04:38 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The following SSE2 code crashes because the non-static global variable breaks
> the alignment of the static data section.
Is this fixed if you use 4.5.0?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 04:42
---
Subject: Bug 35754
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Aug 24 04:41:51 2009
New Revision: 151045
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151045
Log:
2009-08-23 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/35754
--- Comment #3 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2009-08-24
06:15 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > The following SSE2 code crashes because the non-static global variable
> > breaks
> > the alignment of the static data section.
>
> Is this fixe
--- Comment #8 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-24 06:20 ---
Patch fixed for 4.5 at revision 151047.
I would like to backport this patch to 4.4 and possibly to 4.3 branch, too?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40786
When compiling the test program
arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv7-a -O2 -c -o ltest.o ltest.i
Assembler fails to assemble it and emits the error
Error: offset too big
If I do not use -march=armv7-a it works ok and also if I dont use O2 it
compiles fine.
--
Summary: Gas fai
--- Comment #1 from raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2009-08-24 06:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=18417)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18417&action=view)
preprocessed testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41151
56 matches
Mail list logo
