------- Comment #9 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-23 11:41 ------- (In reply to comment #8)
> This patch fixes for me Dmitry's sample, but does not fix mine. Still > SIGSEGVs. > I've managed to > place whole testcase in one file: Ah, the same cure should be applied to "*call_value_pop_1" pattern too. Wait a minute, I'll craft a patch ASAP. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40718
