--- Comment #12 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-22 08:57 ---
In order to avoid the error reported in comment #8, I have tested the following
patches:
(1)
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c
===
--- ../_gcc_clean/gcc
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-22 09:19 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> @@ -3512,8 +3513,7 @@ gfc_get_proc_ptr_comp (gfc_se *se, gfc_e
>e2 = gfc_copy_expr (e);
>e2->expr_type = EXPR_VARIABLE;
>gfc_conv_expr (&comp_se, e2);
> - comp_se.expr = build_
--- Comment #14 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-22 09:27 ---
> Dominique, can you post your dump for comment #4 (especially the call to o%f)?
Is this what you want?
o.f = add;
{
real(kind=4) D.1533;
static real(kind=4) C.1532 = 2.0e+0;
static real(kind=4) C.1
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-22 09:38 ---
> Sorry I was out on vacation. I will take a look.
Well, I only CCed you yesterday :-) Thanks for taking a look!
I rechecked: It is indeed Rev. 149722 which caused the problem of this PR (as
described in comment 2).
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-22 09:43 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Is this what you want?
Jep.
> D.1533 = f (&C.1531, &C.1532);
In principle the 'f' here should be an 'o.f'. Maybe we can postpone this issue
until the other stuff is fixed (will post
--- Comment #5 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-22 10:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=18412)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18412&action=view)
Suggested patch
This patch can solve this. There are two possible ways to solve this.
First) Extend format_lengt
--- Comment #1 from slyfox at inbox dot ru 2009-08-22 12:09 ---
I can confirm gcc-4.4.1 errors the same way.
I think stdcall is offender:
My sample is more complicated, but has the same features: stdcall+tailcall.
Produces SIGSEGV for me https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282189
--- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-22 13:38 ---
Have a patch.
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-22 13:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=18413)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18413&action=view)
patch to fix the failure
Sibcalls of any kind should be done through call-clobbered regs only.
This patch fixes the
--- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-22 13:51 ---
Patched gcc:
bar:
pushl %ebp
movl%esp, %ebp
pushl %ebx
subl$20, %esp
movl8(%ebp), %ebx
movl%ebx, (%esp)
callfoo
subl$4, %esp
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-22 15:28
---
With latest trunk, we get:
$ gfc pr35754.f
pr35754.f:2.21:
write(*,'(EN)') 5.0
1
Error: Period required in format specifier at (1)
pr3575
--- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-08-22 16:43 ---
Subject: Re: Windows %I32 format confusion
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009, ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> This patch can solve this. There are two possible ways to solve this.
> First) Extend format_length_info by an
--- Comment #7 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-22 17:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=18414)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18414&action=view)
Patch using format_length_info member variable
Ok, here is the version using format_length_info to marked the sc
--- Comment #5 from slyfox at inbox dot ru 2009-08-22 18:38 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=18413)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18413&action=view) [edit]
> patch to fix the failure
>
> Sibcalls of any kind should be done through call-clobb
--- Comment #25 from stepan at coresystems dot de 2009-08-22 19:19 ---
This still happens in 4.4.1 for me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25672
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-22 22:07 ---
Should not this PR be closed as FIXED?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35732
--- Comment #2 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-22 23:21 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-08/msg00324.html
--
bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 02:20 ---
Subject: Bug 28093
Author: bdavis
Date: Sun Aug 23 02:19:59 2009
New Revision: 151021
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151021
Log:
2009-08-22 Bud Davis
PR fortran/28093
*
--- Comment #3 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 02:20 ---
Subject: Bug 28039
Author: bdavis
Date: Sun Aug 23 02:19:59 2009
New Revision: 151021
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151021
Log:
2009-08-22 Bud Davis
PR fortran/28093
*
--- Comment #4 from bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 02:27 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-08/msg00324.html
--
bdavis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 02:57 ---
Subject: Bug 41081
Author: amodra
Date: Sun Aug 23 02:57:26 2009
New Revision: 151022
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151022
Log:
PR target/41081
* fwprop.c (try_fwprop_subst):
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 03:39 ---
Fixed by revision 151023.
No plans for a back port.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-08-23 03:49
---
.
--
amodra at bigpond dot net dot au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from amodra at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 03:53 ---
Subject: Bug 41081
Author: amodra
Date: Sun Aug 23 03:53:02 2009
New Revision: 151025
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151025
Log:
PR target/41081
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (rotl
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-23 06:25
---
F95 Standard: 10.1.1
"Constraint: The comma used to separate format-items in a format-item-list may
be omitted
(1) Between a P edit descriptor and an immediately following F, E, EN, ES, D,
or G edit descriptor
25 matches
Mail list logo
