--- Comment #16 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-05 23:19 ---
Fixed, again. ;-)
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|U
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 00:20
---
Subject: Bug 27422
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat May 6 00:19:40 2006
New Revision: 113568
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113568
Log:
PR c++/27422
* typeck.c (convert_arguments
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 00:23
---
Subject: Bug 27422
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat May 6 00:23:51 2006
New Revision: 113569
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113569
Log:
PR c++/27422
* typeck.c (convert_arguments
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 00:27
---
Subject: Bug 27422
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat May 6 00:26:58 2006
New Revision: 113570
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113570
Log:
PR c++/27422
* typeck.c (convert_arguments
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 00:32
---
Subject: Bug 27423
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat May 6 00:32:27 2006
New Revision: 113571
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113571
Log:
PR c++/27423
* typeck.c (convert_for_initi
--- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 00:35
---
Fixed on mainline, 4.1 branch, and 4.0 branch.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 00:36
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 00:40
---
Subject: Bug 27430
Author: reichelt
Date: Sat May 6 00:40:40 2006
New Revision: 113572
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=113572
Log:
PR c++/27430
* pt.c (process_template_parm
--- Comment #5 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 00:41
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-06 00:54 ---
Subject: Bug number PR target/27421
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00244.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-06 00:55 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/27447
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg00245.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
The following invalid testcase crashes the C++ frontend since GCC 3.4.0:
=
void foo()
{
asm("" ::: X);
}
=
bug.cc: In function 'void foo()':
bug.cc:3: error: expected string-literal before 'X'
bug.cc:3: error: expected `)' before 'X'
bug.cc:3: internal co
--- Comment #11 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 01:17 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I haven't looked into the rev. history, to see why/when this fix was made,
> but will ask the hypothetical: was this fix made to workaround the
> misbehavior in create_tmp_var_raw()?
One coul
--- Comment #12 from gary at intrepid dot com 2006-05-06 01:42 ---
Given the above, I suggest that my bug report be marked closed,
because the problem I was seeing in 4.0.1 is fixed by the
change to create_tmp_from_val that passes in TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT().
Note that the use of the main var
I will like to request gfortran's support for intrinsic functions that returns
trigonometric functions in degrees, i.e sind,cosd etc. I understand these are
not part of standard fortran intrinsic, but a couple other fortran compilers
provides them.
Thanks.
--
Summary: gfortran suppor
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 06:14 ---
Why?
Is it that difficult to write a module
to provide sind and friends?
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 06:22 ---
In fact it is easy to divide by 90° and multiply by pi.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #3 from deji_aking at yahoo dot ca 2006-05-06 06:32 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> In fact it is easy to divide by 90° and multiply by pi.
>
You just proved my point, one would want to divide by 180 and multiply by pi
;).
Having sind and co safeguard against such silly mista
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 06:55
---
Any reason to keep this open? gfortran doesn't have a problem with irix6.5 any
more, as far as I know.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16322
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
