------- Comment #11 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-06 01:17 ------- (In reply to comment #9) > I haven't looked into the rev. history, to see why/when this fix was made, > but will ask the hypothetical: was this fix made to workaround the > misbehavior in create_tmp_var_raw()?
One could perhaps argue this, but I would expect that a function named "raw" would not do anything in the way of preprocessing. That it would create a variable of exactly the type given. I'm comfortable leaving the volatile removal in create_tmp_from_val; that's where the bulk of our temporaries come from anyway. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27445
