[Bug c/22362] New: Register allocation problem in combination with -funit-at-a-time and global register variables

Hi... I'm using debian's unstable gcc 4.0: $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f95,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext -

[Bug middle-end/22174] [4.1 Regression] xgcc ices on stage2/ada.

--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-08 07:43 --- gcc-4.1.0-0.20050707T1814UTC bootstraped w/o errors. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONF

[Bug bootstrap/22314] [4.1 regression] ICE in make profiledbootstrap: corrupted profile info for gcc/dominance.c

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-

[Bug middle-end/21965] Openssl segfaults when compiled with gcc 4.0.0 on solaris 9

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 08:42 --- Please try with 4.0.1, 4.0.0 had known serious defects. -- What|Removed |Added

GCJ and ARM-ELF not cross compilable to native code

GCJ and ARM-ELF not cross compilable to native code Hello, we compiled and installed gcj for i686 not cross. It worked fine. We compiled and installed gcj for arm-elf cross. It produced .class-files. We were not able to compile and install gcj for arm-elf cross to produce native code. We checke

[Bug tree-optimization/21568] [4.0/4.1 regression] Casts in folding *& omitted

--- Additional Comments From gcc2eran at tromer dot org 2005-07-08 09:18 --- (In reply to comment #13) > In the C99 standard, 6.5.4 Cast Operators, Footnote 85 "A cast does not > yield an lvalue. Thus, a cast to a qualified type has the same effect > as a cast to the unqualified versi

[Bug tree-optimization/22277] [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE cc40001 in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566

--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-07-08 09:33 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Most likely related to PR 22279. `first_vi_for_offset` bug still occurs and it's easy to reproduct: [ qt4 build / gcc-20050707T1814UTC ] (...) g++ -c -pipe -I/usr/include/postgresql/serve

[Bug fortran/18022] problem with structure and calling a function

--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-08 09:37 --- (In reply to comment #1) > This looks like it's a dupe of 15553 > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15553 *** This is not correct - 15553 has been resolved. The present bug comes about because

[Bug c++/21799] [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 11:06 --- Subject: Bug 21799 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 11:05:52 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog pt.c gcc/testsuite

[Bug c++/21799] [4.0/4.1 regression] Spurious ambiguity with pointers to members

--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 11:08 --- Fixed mainline 2005-07-08 Nathan Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR c++/21799 * pt.c (type_unification_real): Add is_method argument. Use it for this pointer unification. (fn_t

[Bug c++/22363] New: Problems with friend function injection and destructor

This code does not compile: template struct Feature { friend void AssertFeature0(T *) {} }; template inline void AssertFeature(T *t = 0) { if(t) AssertFeature0(t); } template struct Test : Feature< Test > { int i; ~Test() { AssertFeature(); } }; struct Foo : Feature {

[Bug fortran/21875] [meta-bug] NIST test suite failures

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 11:15 --- Jerry said he's working on this. -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/22364] New: Problems with friend function injection and destructor

This code does not compile: template struct Feature { friend void AssertFeature0(T *) {} }; template inline void AssertFeature(T *t = 0) { if(t) AssertFeature0(t); } template struct Test : Feature< Test > { int i; ~Test() { AssertFeature(); } }; struct Foo : Feature {

[Bug regression/21456] compile time regression(s) after gcc-4.0-20050326, 4.0 (+300%) 4.1 (+500%)

--- Additional Comments From andre dot maute at gmx dot de 2005-07-08 11:17 --- (In reply to comment #3) Daniel Berlin suggested to check if -O2 compile times have increased too. indeed they DID! there is a bigger regression between 2005/03/26 and 2005/04/09 for gcc-4.0 and ther

[Bug target/22112] Another fallout from alias warning patch

--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 11:18 --- rth beat me to installing a patch -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/20126] [3.4 Regression] Inlined memcmp makes one argument null on entry

--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 12:23 --- I don't know whether I just forgot about it, or figured we'd be better off leaving it as it was for a bit longer, so as to expose more cases we could handle especially. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show

[Bug c++/22365] New: Fails to link

struct TT1 { static int v1; static int v2; }; int TT1::v1; int TT1::v2 = 3; template struct TT2 { static int v1; static int v2; }; template<> int TT2::v1; template<> int TT2::v2 = 3; int main() { TT1 v; v

[Bug tree-optimization/22277] [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE cc40001 in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566

--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 12:54 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] ACATS ICE cc40001 in first_vi_for_offset, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2566 On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 09:33 +, pluto at agmk dot net wrote: > --- Additional Comments

[Bug fortran/18022] problem with structure and calling a function

--- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-08 13:01 --- (In reply to comment #3) I answered my own question about the purpose of gfc_trans_arrayfunc_assign. I have written a patch that distinguishes the case of components of derived types and skips this call. T

[Bug c/22098] [4.0 Regression] ICE in compound literal gimplification

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 13:08 --- Subject: Bug 22098 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 13:08:15 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug c/22013] [4.0 Regression] ICE in gimple_add_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:535

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 13:09 --- Subject: Bug 22013 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 13:08:15 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug c/22308] [4.0 Regression] Failure to diagnose violation of constraint 6.516p2

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 13:14 --- Subject: Bug 22308 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 13:13:52 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug fortran/22345] Internal compiler error compiling BLAS routine dspr.f

--- Additional Comments From mick at nag dot co dot uk 2005-07-08 13:32 --- Subject: Re: Internal compiler error compiling BLAS routine dspr.f pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-07 > 13:20 --- > I thi

[Bug fortran/18022] problem with structure and calling a function

--- Additional Comments From gruel at astro dot ufl dot edu 2005-07-08 13:34 --- Subject: Re: problem with structure and calling a function paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr wrote: > --- Additional Comments From paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr 2005-07-08 > 09:37 --- > (In reply t

[Bug c/21911] named parameter mistakenly identified as sentinel

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 14:01 --- Subject: Bug 21911 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 13:59:35 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug middle-end/21897] [4.1 Regression] Segementation fault in fold_ternary

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 14:11 --- Subject: Bug 21897 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-rhl-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 14:10:56 Modified files: gcc: Ch

[Bug c++/19317] [4.1 Regression] removing a temporary return value when we cannot

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 14:13 --- Subject: Bug 19317 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-rhl-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 14:13:13 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : Ch

[Bug tree-optimization/22360] upper_bound_in_type and lower_bound_in_type are buggy

-- What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc- ||patches/2005- |

[Bug c++/22361] Fails to identify

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-08 14:16 --- This is already fixed in 4.0. In previous versions, one can have a little fun if the compiler is configured with checking enabled: g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-2.95.3/bin/c++ -c x.cc x.cc: In function `int m

[Bug c++/22364] Problems with friend function injection and destructor

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-08 14:19 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22363 *** -- What|Removed |Added St

[Bug c++/22363] Problems with friend function injection and destructor

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-08 14:19 --- *** Bug 22364 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22363

[Bug fortran/22345] Internal compiler error compiling BLAS routine dspr.f

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 14:20 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21963 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/19005] [3.4 regression] Error: bad register name `%sil'

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 14:21 --- Subject: Bug 19005 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-rhl-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 14:20:28 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : Ch

[Bug tree-optimization/21963] [4.1 Regression] ICE (seg fault) with -m64 (in IV-OPTS)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 14:20 --- *** Bug 22345 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/22365] Fails to link

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-08 14:21 --- This template<> int TT2::v1; only declares the existence of an explicit specialization. It does not define it. The standard explicitly says that to make this a definition you need to provide an in

[Bug c++/22363] Problems with friend function injection and destructor

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Known to fail||2.95.3 3.2.3 3.3.3 3.4.0 |

[Bug target/22362] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] static function calls and global register variables

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 14:37 --- What is happening is that MR_deep_copy_typeclass_info is not being inlined but instead GCC changes the how the arguments are passed, via registers. This is a target bug. The bug is in: /* Use regist

[Bug c/22308] [4.0 Regression] Failure to diagnose violation of constraint 6.516p2

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 14:46 --- Fixed for 3.4.5, 4.0.2, 4.1.0. -- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|

[Bug ada/22340] Ada build fails with --enable-bootsrap

-- What|Removed |Added CC||v dot haisman at sh dot cvut ||dot cz http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil

[Bug c/21911] named parameter mistakenly identified as sentinel

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.1.0 |4.0.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21911

[Bug c/22013] [4.0 Regression] ICE in gimple_add_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:535

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 14:48 --- Fixed for 4.0.2 and above. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/22098] [4.0 Regression] ICE in compound literal gimplification

-- Bug 22098 depends on bug 22013, which changed state. Bug 22013 Summary: [4.0 Regression] ICE in gimple_add_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:535 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22013 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug c/22098] [4.0 Regression] ICE in compound literal gimplification

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 14:49 --- Fixed for 4.0.2 and above. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/22366] New: [meta-bug] issues holding up the removal of loop.c

This is a meta-bug for any issues related to the removal of the old loop optimizer. Please make this bug depend on: 1) any bugs in loop.c; 2) any bugs or pessimizations with -floop-optimize2 (i.e. the new RTL loop optimizers); 3) any bugs about missed optimizations with -fno-loop-optimi

[Bug ada/22340] Ada build fails with --enable-bootsrap

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/22366] [meta-bug] issues holding up the removal of loop.c

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 14:58 --- Bug 7561 is apparently a long-forgotten bug in loop.c array prefetching. Bug 21323 is a stength reduction ICE in loop.c. Bug 21848 is a report about loop.c producing wrong code. Bug 22325 is a missed

[Bug c/16620] [meta-bug] C90 conformance bugs

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22367 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16620

[Bug fortran/22359] fseek intrinsic appears to be unimplemented

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 14:58 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||19292

[Bug c/22367] New: constraints on '&' not fully implemented

extern void v; void f(void) { &v; } is invalid in both C90 and C99: lvalues cannot have type void, although they can have types const void or volatile void, and none of the other possibilities for operands on '&' are met. However, GCC fails to diagnose this code. extern void *p; void f(void) { &

[Bug c/16989] [meta-bug] C99 conformance bugs

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22367 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16989

[Bug target/21323] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||22366 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21323

[Bug c++/22363] Problems with friend function injection and destructor

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-07-08 14:58 --- I don't quite know what to say, whether this is a bug or not. Take this reduced snippet: --- template struct S { friend void foo(T *); }; template void bar() { foo((T*)0); }

[Bug ada/22340] Ada build fails with --enable-bootsrap

--- Additional Comments From v dot haisman at sh dot cvut dot cz 2005-07-08 15:02 --- I have the same problem on FreeBSD. The following patch seems to fix (bootstrap still in progess). Index: Makefile.in === RCS file: /cvs/

[Bug tree-optimization/22360] [4.0/4.1 Regression] upper_bound_in_type and lower_bound_in_type are buggy

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:06 --- Confirmed, this is a latent bug in 4.0.0. The code was not in 3.4.0 so this is 4.0.0 regression. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/22360] [4.0/4.1 Regression] upper_bound_in_type and lower_bound_in_type are buggy

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:07 --- This also blocks the tree combiner even though I don't see the regression on ppc-darwin. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c/22367] constraints on '&' not fully implemented

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:08 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug middle-end/22366] [meta-bug] issues holding up the removal of loop.c

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:15 --- [[old loop optimizer]] -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/22085] [4.1 Regression] error with -fpreprocessed

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:20 --- Patch posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug other/22368] New: [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

This is a meta bug for all of the mis-match type bugs in GCC. -- Summary: [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: meta-bug Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compone

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22328 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug ada/22328] Ada produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||22368 nThis|| http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22328

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22329 BugsThisDependsOn||22335 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22356 BugsThisDependsOn||22358 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug middle-end/22366] [meta-bug] issues holding up the removal of loop.c

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:30 --- Bug 19581 is about store motion that only loop.c currently does. Bug 19078 reports on a few tuning issues with BIV splitting in the unroller. Bug 11707 is about the lack of a constant propagation pass a

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-07-

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22369 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug c++/22369] New: C++ produces mis-matched types with pointers to member functions

Testcase: struct A { void f() { } }; struct B: public A { }; typedef void (B::*bp)(); int main() { bp b = &A::f; } -- Summary: C++ produces mis-matched types with pointers to member functions Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status:

[Bug ada/22328] Ada produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

--- Additional Comments From bosch at adacore dot com 2005-07-08 15:39 --- Subject: Re: Ada produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR Something like the attached patch (untested) should work. I've got child duty today, so won't be able to test this until at least tonight

[Bug middle-end/22370] New: Vec lower produces mis-match types

Testcase: typedef short __attribute__((vector_size (16))) vecint; vecint i; vecint j; vecint k; int main () { k = i ^ j; } See PR 22368 for the patch which finds this. -- Summary: Vec lower produces mis-match types Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22370 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug ada/22328] Ada produces mis-match (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

-- What|Removed |Added Attachment #9230|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| Attachment #9230 is|0 |1

[Bug c/22371] New: C front-end produces mis-match types in MODIFY_EXPR

Reduced from gcc.dg/debug/redecl-2.c: typedef int IA[]; typedef int A5[5]; int array10[10]; A5 *ap; void f (void) { int ap; { extern IA *ap; ap = &array10; } } See PR 22368 for the patch which catches this. -- Summary: C front-end produces mis-match types in MODIFY_EXPR

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22371 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug target/20126] [3.4 Regression] Inlined memcmp makes one argument null on entry

--- Additional Comments From uweigand at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 15:48 --- (In reply to comment #51) > I don't know whether I just forgot about it, or figured we'd be better off > leaving it as it was for a bit longer, so as to expose more cases we could > handle especially. Well

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22372 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug tree-optimization/22372] New: Vectorizer produces mis-match types

Testcase: void f(int *); int main () { int i; char ia[16]; char ic[16] = {0,3,6,9,12,15,18,21,24,27,30,33,36,39,42,45}; char ib[16] = {0,3,6,9,12,15,18,21,24,27,30,33,36,39,42,45}; for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) ia[i] = ib[i] + ic[i]; f(ia); return 0; } See PR 22368 for the patch wh

[Bug tree-optimization/22373] New: loop linear produces type mis-match

Testcase: double u[1782225]; int foo(int N, int *res) { unsigned int i, j; double sum = 0; for (i = 0; i < N; i++) { for (j = 0; j < N; j++) { sum = sum + u[i + 1335 * j]; } } *res = sum + N; } Patch in PR 22368 finds

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22373 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22374 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug c++/22374] New: C++ front-end produces mis-match types in MODIFY_EXPR (dynamic_cast)

Testcase: struct B { virtual int f() { } } ob; struct D : public B { virtual int f() { } } od; main() { B *b = &ob; D *c = &dynamic_cast(*b); } Reduced from g++.old-deja/g++.mike/dyncast2.C Patch in PR 22368 is used to find this. -- Summary: C++ front-end produces mis-match

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||22375 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22368

[Bug tree-optimization/22375] New: DOM (or fold_builtins) creates mis-matched types

Take the following fortran code: ! { dg-do run } ! Option passed to avoid excess errors from obsolete warning ! { dg-options "-w" } ! PR18827 integer i,j common /foo/ i,j assign 1000 to j j = 5 goto j 1000 continue end We get errors as __builtin_expect is foldd

[Bug middle-end/22376] New: PTA is slow on a silly unrealistic test case

Compile this at -O1, and you get tree PTA : 12.25 (36%) usr 0.08 ( 5%) sys 12.35 (35%) wall 44137 kB (16%) ggc === int *a; #define C1(A) \ a[A##1] = A; a[A##2] = A; a[A##3] = A; a[A##4] = A; a[A##5

[Bug c++/22369] C++ produces mis-matched types with pointers to member functions

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 16:30 --- Oh, I copied the wrong testcase. Anyways here is the testcase which fails: struct A { void f() { } }; struct B: public A { }; struct C: public A { }; struct D : public B, public C { }; typedef void (C::*cp)

[Bug ada/22340] Ada build fails with --enable-bootsrap

--- Additional Comments From v dot haisman at sh dot cvut dot cz 2005-07-08 17:19 --- The "fix" doesn't fix it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22340

[Bug tree-optimization/22356] mis-match types in cplxlower

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 17:23 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/22356] mis-match types in cplxlower

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:05 --- Subject: Bug 22356 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 18:05:12 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-complex.c gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/22356] mis-match types in cplxlower

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:05 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug other/22368] [meta-bugs] mis-match types in GCC

-- Bug 22368 depends on bug 22356, which changed state. Bug 22356 Summary: mis-match types in cplxlower http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22356 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug tree-optimization/18316] Missed IV optimization

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:19 --- We still have either a ra issue (or ivopts issue which our current ra cannot resolve). On the tree level we get the following difference. strength_test2: :; *(data + (int *) ((unsigned int) *pretmp.9 * 4)

[Bug target/22083] [3.4/4.0 Regression] TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is wrongly defined on AIX 5.1

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:28 --- Subject: Bug 22083 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 18:28:25 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/22083] [3.4/4.0 Regression] TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is wrongly defined on AIX 5.1

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:33 --- Subject: Bug 22083 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 18:33:45 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/22083] [3.4/4.0 Regression] TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is wrongly defined on AIX 5.1

--- Additional Comments From dje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:35 --- Patch applied to gcc-4.0 and gcc-3.4 branches. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/22083] [3.4/4.0 Regression] TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is wrongly defined on AIX 5.1

-- What|Removed |Added Known to work|3.3.3 4.1.0 |3.3.3 4.1.0 4.0.2 Target Milestone|4.0.2 |3.4.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug middle-end/21766] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-cygwin

--- Additional Comments From dims at yahoo dot com 2005-07-08 18:39 --- Is the just released 4.0.1 on another branch? is that working? -- dims -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21766

[Bug middle-end/21766] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-pc-cygwin

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:40 --- (In reply to comment #22) > Is the just released 4.0.1 on another branch? is that working? Yes and yes (well bootstrap is). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21766

[Bug tree-optimization/22329] VRP produces mis-matched (non compatible) types in MODIFY_EXPR

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:41 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/22335] DOM creates mis-matched types

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:43 --- Another testcase for a different related problem but still in DOM: void abort(void) __attribute__((__noreturn__)); typedef struct { int container; } edge_iterator; struct ls_expr { int index; int store

[Bug tree-optimization/22360] [4.0/4.1 Regression] upper_bound_in_type and lower_bound_in_type are buggy

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:49 --- Subject: Bug 22360 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-08 18:49:07 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree.c Log message:

[Bug tree-optimization/22360] [4.0/4.1 Regression] upper_bound_in_type and lower_bound_in_type are buggy

--- Additional Comments From kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08 18:49 --- Just checked in a fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22360

  1   2   >