--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20817
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14325
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15678
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21637
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21347
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21596
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19988
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21117
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22028
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17964
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19703
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21105
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21944
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21350
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17790
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22156
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21491
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16865
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21488
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13726
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18687
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21929
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14438
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21828
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17863
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19565
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14329
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.0.1 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16306
--- Additional Comments From jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2005-07-08 01:56
---
As of today, no compile errors on i686-pc-linux-gnu
4 runtime errors: FM111.f FM903.f FM906.f FM908.f
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21875
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-07-08 01:56
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] debug info omitted for
uninitialized variables
wilson at specifix dot com wrote:
> I think you are just compounding the mistake created by Mark Mitchell's
> patch for PR
Consider tree.c:upper_bound_in_type
Suppose that outer is ulong64 and that inner is int32. Then the function
returns 2^32-1, which is wrong. Since we are widening a signed value, we need
to use a sign extension. The largest value after casting to ulong64 is actually
2^64-1, which occurs when si
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||22360
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20139
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-08
03:12 ---
If you could add -ftime-report from all these, that would be helpful.
Also note that O3 is not expected to be fast on compile time compared to O2, so
it would be nice to know if the O2 numbers changed as we
--- Additional Comments From corey dot taylor at gmail dot com 2005-07-08
05:30 ---
The reason we decided to post this is many front ends were giving different
results: some errored out with diagnostic, some accepted, some accepted but
wouldn't allow proper declaration (considered it a r
template class TP1 {};
template class A>
struct B {
template struct TP2 : public A {};
};
template class TP3, typename T>
voidF(const TP3&) {}
int main() {
B::TP2 b;
F(b);
}
gets you:
~/ootbc/members/src$ c++ foo.cc
foo.cc: In function `int main()':
foo.cc:13: error: n
201 - 237 of 237 matches
Mail list logo