------- Additional Comments From corey dot taylor at gmail dot com 2005-07-08 05:30 ------- The reason we decided to post this is many front ends were giving different results: some errored out with diagnostic, some accepted, some accepted but wouldn't allow proper declaration (considered it a redefinition which is against pargraph 15 of the same section).
Considering that this implementation currently allows either method without portability issues then the enhancement is definately optional as long as it works properly as-is. Just wanted to see if this (and we sent to other projects the same issue) is how implementation was intended. I was part of the discussion on the list. corey -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22354
