--- Additional Comments From anlauf at hep dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2005-03-01 08:33 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Read the F2003 standard.
>
> 5.1.2.8INTRINSIC attribute
> The INTRINSIC attribute confirms that a name is the specific name (13.6) or
> generic name (13.5) of an intrin
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
08:54 ---
Investigating...
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |char
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
09:57 ---
Subject: Bug 20232
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 09:57:45
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog class.c cp-tree.h method.c
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
10:01 ---
Subject: Bug 20232
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 10:00:49
Modified files:
gcc/cp : Change
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
10:02 ---
2005-03-01 Nathan Sidwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/20232
* g++.dg/inherit/covariant12.C: New.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From hundertmarck at boehme-weihs dot de
2005-03-01 10:42 ---
Now I have similar problem on HP-UX 11.00 (32). gcc does not find any definition
of std::wstring. std::string is not useable too, in cause of unsatisfied
symbols. A similar configuration works on HP-UX
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-03-01 11:01
---
Unfortunately, bad news: if I remember correctly, Dave doesn't mean to fix the
problem on anything older that 11.11...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17005
--- Additional Comments From hundertmarck at boehme-weihs dot de
2005-03-01 11:11 ---
Whats the plan? Is it possibile that the problem would be fixed next time?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17005
--- Additional Comments From Serge dot Iovleff at univ-lille1 dot fr
2005-03-01 11:16 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> it is invalid to use A0 in the base constructor list of D, because A0 is not a
> virtual base for D. .it doesn't matter that the inheritance A->A0 is declared
> virtual, 2
--- Additional Comments From doko at debian dot org 2005-03-01 11:33
---
libtool doesn't add the
-L/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20050227/build/ia64-linux-gnu/libjava/.libs
argument, as it does for
-L/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20050227/build/ia64-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src
--
http://gc
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-03-01
12:39 ---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for function parameter
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:-
> Yes I understand. However it seems somewhat ironic that "static const"
> already does j
--- Additional Comments From coudert at clipper dot ens dot fr 2005-03-01
13:10 ---
This has indeed nothing to do with the output being redirected to a file, or
stdout, or even being connected (in Fortran way) to a file:
$ cat pr20257.f90
integer, parameter :: NX = 32, NR = 16, NPHI=2
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||coudert at clipper dot ens
||dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|fortran |lib
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
14:03 ---
Hmm, this works for me with 3.4.0 and on the mainline.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20260
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Last reconfirmed|2004-11-30 1
Given this code:
template struct int_ {
static const T value = N;
typedef int_< T, static_cast(value+1) > next;
};
GCC says:
intconst2.cc:3: error: template argument 2 is invalid
It works if you replace "value" with "N".
Possibly related to recent changes to C++ parser di
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
14:32 ---
This has already fixed in a later version of gcc, at least 20050225.
This is a dup of bug 20220.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20220 ***
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
14:32 ---
*** Bug 20261 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
14:57 ---
Subject: Bug 19065
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 14:57:25
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-03-01 15:06 ---
Subject: Re: wide character strings don't work on HP-UX
> --- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-03-01 11:01
> ---
> Unfortunately, bad news: if I remember correctly, Da
--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-03-01 15:08
---
Karel, could you retest the testcase with the gcc-4.0 branch?
Several speed-up patches went in after your last benchmark.
Thanks,
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17278
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
15:11 ---
Subject: Bug 19065
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 15:10:41
Modified files:
libstdc++-v3 : Change
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
15:12 ---
Fixed at least on the mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
15:14 ---
Subject: Bug 19065
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 15:14:25
Modified files:
gcc: ChangeLog
Log message:
Corr
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-01 15:20
---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for
function parameter
> - Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-03-01
>> Yes I understand. However it seems somewhat ironic th
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.1.0 |4.0.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19065
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-03-01
15:43 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > (In reply to comment #11)
> I get the same as I got above with the following version on x86:
> GNU C version 4.0.0 20050225 (experimental) (i686-
The following code snippet triggers the assert.
Interestingly, the exact message that you get depends on the gcc version. 2.9x
gives you a "6+1 != 6" message, where 3.x gives you a "7+1 != 7".
On gcc3.3.5:
silly: sillytest.c:7: main: Assertion `((7) + 1 == (7))' failed.
Aborted
The code is as fo
--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
16:01 ---
We really need to fix this for 4.0.0
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-03-01 16:04 ---
The first attempt is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg01835.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20218
--- Additional Comments From tomdkat at comcast dot net 2005-03-01 16:07
---
I *was* able to compile gtk+-2.6.3 with gcc 3.4.4-20050225:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ gcc -v
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
16:22 ---
Subject: Bug 20216
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: apple-ppc-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 16:21:44
Modified files:
gcc: tree
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
16:28 ---
Subject: Bug 20216
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 16:27:51
Modified files:
gcc: Change
Using a global variable tied to register g7 generates invalid assembly
code on sparc64.
Consider:
register void *tp __asm__("%g7");
void set_tp() {
tp = 0;
}
Compiling this file produces an error and a warning from the assembler:
/usr/ccs/bin/as: "/var/tmp//ccLsIpQg.s"
--- Additional Comments From rcbilson at plg dot uwaterloo dot ca
2005-03-01 16:50 ---
I seem to have screwed something up in gccbug -- this is not a 2.95 issue. I've
encoundered this problem with 3.4.3 and with the Feb. 28 mainline CVS version.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From rcbilson at plg dot uwaterloo dot ca
2005-03-01 16:52 ---
Attempting to change "Reported against"...
--
What|Removed |Added
Version|2
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-01
16:56 ---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for
function parameter
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
> - unless I misunderstand the question, the only way a pointer itself
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
17:05 ---
Well considering this is glibc bug, yes this needs to be fixed but really glibc
should have this code in
the first place as it would break with -pedantic and they were using an
undocumented extension.
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
17:06 ---
And now fixed on the 4.0 branch also.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
Here is g++ --version
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/local/src/gcc-build # g++-cvs --version
g++-cvs (GCC) 4.1.0 20050301 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FI
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
17:10 ---
Use "gmake -k check" as described in the docs.
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|cri
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
17:13 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> I can only assume that this has regressed, that this is a
> little-endian problem (why it should be so is beyond me, though),
> that your specific vibes make this go away or that
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
17:16 ---
Outer Macros are expanded before inner ones and they get all placed on one line
so this is invalid.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From jcobyrne at cox dot net 2005-03-01 17:16
---
Ok gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/gcc-build/fixincludes' autogen
-T /usr/local/src/gcc/fixincludes/check.tpl
/usr/local/src/gcc/fixincludes/inclhack.def gmake[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/local/src
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
17:17 ---
Ok, I am going to close this as works for me then.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From jcobyrne at cox dot net 2005-03-01 17:19
---
Ok that didn't work so well.
Let's try again.
gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/gcc-build/fixincludes'
autogen -
T /usr/local/src/gcc/fixincludes/check.tpl /usr/local/src/gcc/fixincludes/inclha
ck.def
--- Additional Comments From jcobyrne at cox dot net 2005-03-01 17:22
---
Created an attachment (id=8304)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8304&action=view)
ok this should be easier :)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20264
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
17:25 ---
Subject: Bug 8608
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 17:24:55
Modified files:
gcc/java : check-init.c ChangeLog
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
17:26 ---
Looks like you don't have dejagnu installed or not in your path.
This works for me and many other people.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
17:46 ---
Here is how I would fix this use objc_hash_* in libobjc and then declare in
hash.h, a deperated inline
functions which call the new functions. The other thing would be have a new
file which has those inl
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
17:47 ---
Confirmed, we just forgot to remove the % from NAME when outputing it.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
18:00 ---
I'll fix this bug if someone can test the fix on a stabs machine for me.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
18:09 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I get different asm for AMD64 as well:
Since AMD64 and x86 have lea, it is not as impressive on PPC or any other
target that does have a+b*c
instructions.
--
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
18:11 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From dpatel at apple dot com 2005-03-01 18:18
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression]: Macro debug info broken due to lexer
change
On Mar 1, 2005, at 10:00 AM, dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> I'll fix this bug if someone can test the fix on a stabs
I am using version 4.0 of gcj and when trying to convert a jar to a shared
library I get the following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] WMQ]$ gcj -I /home/acuser/gcj/WMQ -shared com.ibm.mq.jar -o
mq-
shared.so
com/ibm/mq/BindingsConnectionRequestInfo.java:0: error: cannot find file for
class javax.resource
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
18:27 ---
try -I /home/acuser/gcj/WMQ/other.jar
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20265
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
18:33 ---
It should be fixed by the next push from AdaCore.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18727
Using gcj verion 4 running on red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 I tried to
create a executable using shared libraries I had previously created. I got the
following results:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] WMQ]$ gcj --main=mqTester -o mqTester mqTester.java -L. -
lconnector-shared -lmq-shared
mqTester.java
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
19:23 ---
I think you are missing that gcj does not look into .jar files in the
CLASSPATH, if you add the .jar file to
the CLASSPATH it should work, can you try that?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
--- Additional Comments From themis_hv at yahoo dot co dot uk 2005-03-01
19:33 ---
Yes, glibc should have this code in the first place but we can not turn the
clock back/time travel.
Futhermore, I can reproduce it on i686-pc-linux-gnu with NPTL-enabled
glibc-2.3.3 system using official
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
19:52 ---
Fixing.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ebotcazou
Here is the compilation failure I am facing out of libgcj build, I am
only concerned with the "too few arguments to function error"
prims.cc: In function `void unblock_signal(int)':
prims.cc:136: warning: right-hand operand of comma has no effect
prims.cc:137: warning: right-hand operand of co
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
20:17 ---
You seem to intermixing compiler versions and libgcj versions.
This works for me and many other people.
How are you building gcj/libgcj? Are you really building the full GCC or just
libjava (which is not
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01 20:17
---
Reduced testcase:
program achar_test
implicit none
integer i
character(*), parameter :: y(0:1) = (/'0','1'/)
write(*,*) y
end program achar_test
This has nothing to do with ACHAR, and is the same i
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01 20:17
---
*** Bug 19576 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01 20:22
---
Can this be closed with the recent change of default complex divide algorithm?
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01 20:31
---
Reduced testcase:
character(*), parameter :: y(1:1) = (/'0'/)
print *,y
end
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15959
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-03-01
21:07 ---
Andrew,
I'm sorry if I'm not making myself clear here.
The problem that I see is that, on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu and on
i386-pc-linux-gnu, with clean trees, I see code like
:;
D.2390 = 0.0 / SR.22;
It appears that g++ is generating incorrect scope debug information
for inlined functions. One symptom of this is that addr2line will
generate inconsistent results for the affected address ranges, showing
the correct line information for the inlined function, but showing the
function name as the
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
21:14 ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Andrew,
>
> I'm sorry if I'm not making myself clear here.
>
> The problem that I see is that, on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu and on
> i386-pc-linux-gnu, with clean trees, I see code
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
21:16 ---
What version of gcc can you reproduce this with?
Give the output of "gcc -v"?
--
What|Removed |Added
-
his with?
> Give the output of "gcc -v"?
$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /src/sourceware/gcc/gcc/configure -v
--prefix=/opt/local/sourceware --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.0 20050301 (experimental)
--
ht
--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-03-01
21:26 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> > :;
> > D.2390 = 0.0 / SR.22;
> > D.2392 = SR.22 + D.2390 * 0.0;
> > c$real = (D.2371 + D.2372 * D.2390) / D.2392;
> > c$imag = (D.2372 - D.2371 * D.2390) / D.2392;
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-01 21:41
---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for
function parameter
> --- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-01
> Subject: error generated for storage class specified
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
21:47 ---
Is there a way to produce the output you gave easily?
Also why do you think gcc should produce good debug information with
optimizations since scheduling
can change ording of instructions so it causes DW_T
--- Additional Comments From aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
22:27 ---
Subject: [PR libgcj/20160] rename archive members with duplicate basenames
The archives created for libjava are broken, in that some of the
object files that should go into it are missing. That's because AR
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
22:27 ---
Subject: Bug 20160
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 22:27:44
Modified files:
. : ChangeLog ltmain.sh
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
22:29 ---
Subject: Bug 20160
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-01 22:29:34
Modified files:
. : Change
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-01
22:30 ---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for
function parameter
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
> not supported by the present standard; it may be worthy of considera
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-03-01 22:43
---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for
function parameter
> -- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-01
> Subject: error generated for storage class specified f
--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-01
22:59 ---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for
function parameter
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:
> Understood. Are you aware of any existing efforts to extend GCC in t
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-03-01
23:13 ---
Subject: Re: __LINE__ implementation flaky.
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
> 17:16 ---
> Outer Macros are exp
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-03-01
23:36 ---
Subject: Re: __LINE__ implementation flaky.
neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-03-01
> 23:13 ---
> Subject: Re: __LI
gcc -v output:
Reading specs from /opt/gcc-3.4/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/specs
Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/opt/gcc-3.4 --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.3
See following preprocessed output:
extern "C" {
extern void __assert_fail (__const char *__asserti
../../xgcc -B../../ -DIN_GCC `echo -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-pr
ototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common |sed -e 's/-pedantic//g' -e 's/-Wtradi
tional//g'` -o ../../gnatmake b_gnatm.o a-except.o ctrl_c.o ali.o ali-util.o s
-casuti.o alloc.o atree.o binderr.o butil.o casing.o cse
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-03-02 00:04
---
You can't access a floating point variable through a pointer to integer.
Read up on -fstrict-aliasing, or its negative -fno-strict-aliasing.
W.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02
00:05 ---
and with gfortran 4.1 20040301 at -O2 I get:
csep.out: CST drivers: 1 out of 11664 tests failed to pass the threshold
csep.out: CST:1 out of 4662 tests failed to pass the threshold
ctest.out: CT
--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-03-02
00:05 ---
Mark, what's the status on this? Kriang replied to your review with another
patch, but nothing happened since. Can we have either patch approved?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01007.html
http
--- Additional Comments From billingd at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02
00:07 ---
Fixed by changes to complex divide algorithm.
See comment #46 on PR5900 for LAPACK testsuite results at -O2.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--
Bug 5900 depends on bug 19693, which changed state.
Bug 19693 Summary: optimization problem with LAPACK routine cgtts2.f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19693
What|Old Value |New Value
-
--- Additional Comments From bonniot at users dot sf dot net 2005-03-02
00:11 ---
What's the take on this bug? Can indirect-dispatch be made the default in the
foreseable future? Can the old verifier be fixed?
I'm now running nightly builds of gcj on the Nice compiler testsuite (1250
te
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02
00:21 ---
This is called a violation of aliasing rules by the way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20269
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
Keywords|
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02
00:27 ---
I am going to assume this is fixed so I am going to close as such.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From bobm75 at gmail dot com 2005-03-02 00:33
---
I read the documentation on -fstrict-aliasing and it makes sense to me why this
code breaks those rules. I just wonder why the compiler didn't warn about it,
since this seems to be a pretty straight forward case o
../../xgcc -B../../ -DIN_GCC `echo -g -O2 -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-pr
ototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-common |sed -e 's/-pedantic//g' -e 's/-Wtradi
tional//g'` -o ../../gnatmake b_gnatm.o a-except.o ctrl_c.o ali.o ali-util.o s
-casuti.o alloc.o atree.o binderr.o butil.o casing.o cse
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2005-03-02 00:44 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.1.0 Regression] Link error: unsatisfied s
Oops, I hit reload. This is a duplicate.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20271
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-02
00:44 ---
I am going to assume you pressed return on accident.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20270 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
