------- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-03-01 22:30 ------- Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for function parameter
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, schlie at comcast dot net wrote: > not supported by the present standard; it may be worthy of consideration as > a sensible optionally enabled extension; as the use of the combination > "static const" in this context seems fully consistent with the specification It seems like an extension that would not be sensible at all. Type 2 TRs are for experimental features and should be considered as "if you want to do this, it would be a good idea to do it this way; you might find issues through implementation experience which lead to the TR being improved and the subject matter eventually becoming less experimental". So given there's a DTR on this subject, if you want to implement address spaces you should follow the TR and so assist future standardisation rather than implementing some random other extension to do the same thing. We shouldn't go implementing our own new extension to do something there's a standard way to do. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20258
