[Bug c++/17964] [4.0 Regression] cpp error messages contain wrong line in C++

2005-02-08 Thread zack at codesourcery dot com
--- Additional Comments From zack at codesourcery dot com 2005-02-09 02:28 --- I am testing a patch for this bug now. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug other/19525] [4.0 Regression] In-build-directory multilib testing broken

2005-02-08 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 02:51 --- See this thread: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-02/msg00264.html including this clarification of the proposed direction: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-02/msg00273.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bug

[Bug c++/19733] [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE on invalid destructor call

2005-02-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 02:53 --- Subject: Bug 19733 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-09 02:53:44 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog gcc/cp : C

[Bug c++/19733] [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE on invalid destructor call

2005-02-08 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 03:02 --- Fixed in GCC 3.4.4. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|

[Bug c++/19734] [3.4 regression] Another ICE on invalid destructor call

2005-02-08 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 03:06 --- Fixed in 4.0, by the patch for PR 19733. -- What|Removed |Added Summary|[3.4/4.0

[Bug c++/19826] [4.0 Regression] More array bounds rejected as non-constant in template...

2005-02-08 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 03:09 --- Yeah, this is me being an idiot. Will fix. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unass

[Bug java/19834] New: Eclipse bytecode miscompiled with -O --indirect-dispatch

2005-02-08 Thread mckinlay at redhat dot com
The following test case gets miscompiled from bytecode with "-O --indirect-dispatch". It doesn't appear to matter which compiler produced the bytecode - the same error occurs with all of them. import java.util.*; public class Test { static int i = 0; static int get() { return i++; } publ

[Bug tree-optimization/19831] Missing DSE/malloc/free optimization

2005-02-08 Thread dberlin at dberlin dot org
--- Additional Comments From dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 03:42 --- Subject: Re: New: Missing DSE/malloc/free optimization > void *malloc(__SIZE_TYPE__); > void free(void*); > int f(void) > { > char *i = malloc(1); > *i = 1; > free (i); > } > > This is somet

[Bug middle-end/19583] [4.0 Regression] Incorrect diagnostic: control may reach end of non-void function '...' being inlined

2005-02-08 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2005-02-09 03:52 --- New patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00342.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19583

[Bug libgcj/19823] java fails with non-executable memory

2005-02-08 Thread mckinlay at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From mckinlay at redhat dot com 2005-02-09 04:11 --- Note that TestProxy is failing too, which does seem to indicate a problem with ffi closures. boehm-gc does have code to call mprotect() on its heap (see PROTECT/UNPROTECT in os_dep.c), but it isn't used because

[Bug libgcj/19823] java fails with non-executable memory

2005-02-08 Thread Hans dot Boehm at hp dot com
--- Additional Comments From Hans dot Boehm at hp dot com 2005-02-09 05:38 --- I believe that the GC alters permissions on the heap only if either - It is running in incremental mode, or - It is built with USE_MMAP, and thus uses mmap to allocate the heap. I think we talked about always

[Bug c/19835] New: [AVR] Loop variable gets widened to LONG instead of int

2005-02-08 Thread andrewhutchinson at cox dot net
GNU C version 4.0.0 20041205 (experimental) (avr) Loop variable gets widened to LONG instead of unsigned int (or perhaps even int). Seems we forgeot how big the target is? Testcase: struct S19 { unsigned char i[19]; }; void init (struct S19 *p, int i)

[Bug preprocessor/19836] New: -E -dD includes predefined macros

2005-02-08 Thread jason at catapult dot com
The -dD flag includes all the defined macros that -dM includes. Unless I'm mistaken in my understanding of a predefined macro, it shouldn't include the ones defined in the std C headers. This is the case for 3.4.3 and 3.3.5. === ~/misc> touch foo.h ; cpp -dD foo.h | sort > test2 ~/misc> t

[Bug preprocessor/19836] -E -dD includes predefined macros

2005-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 06:15 --- This is documented to do this so this is not a bug. -- What|Removed |Added Statu

[Bug tree-optimization/19835] [4.0 Regression] [AVR] Loop variable gets widened to LONG instead of int

2005-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization Keywords||missed-optimization Summary|[AVR]

[Bug c/19837] New: Floating-point numerical regression with and without optimization

2005-02-08 Thread wirawan0 at softhome dot net
VERSION KNOWN TO BE AFFECTED: 3.4.3, 3.2.2 My gcc gives the following version/compilation info: ~/Projects/BUGS $ g++ -v Reading specs from /usr/local/gcc-3.4.3/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.3/specs Configured with: ../gcc-3.4.3/configure --enable-threads=posix --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-3.4.3 --ena

[Bug c/19837] Floating-point numerical regression with and without optimization

2005-02-08 Thread wirawan0 at softhome dot net
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19837

[Bug c/19837] Floating-point numerical regression with and without optimization

2005-02-08 Thread wirawan0 at softhome dot net
--- Additional Comments From wirawan0 at softhome dot net 2005-02-09 06:25 --- Created an attachment (id=8147) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8147&action=view) A testcase to reproduce the error reported. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19837

[Bug preprocessor/19836] -E -dD includes predefined macros

2005-02-08 Thread jason at catapult dot com
--- Additional Comments From jason at catapult dot com 2005-02-09 06:27 --- (In reply to comment #1) > This is documented to do this so this is not a bug. I thought -dD was supposed to NOT include predefined macros? Jason -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19836

[Bug c/19837] Floating-point numerical regression with and without optimization

2005-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 06:34 --- x86 is werid in that it almost always uses 80 bit float point and not IEEE 64 bit floating point. This is a duplicate of bug 323. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 *** -- What

[Bug c++/19732] [4.0 regression] Invalid destructor declarations accepted

2005-02-08 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/323] optimized code gives strange floating point results

2005-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 06:35 --- *** Bug 19837 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug preprocessor/19836] -E -dD includes predefined macros

2005-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 06:39 --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > This is documented to do this so this is not a bug. > > I thought -dD was supposed to NOT include predefined macros? This is what the documentation sa

[Bug target/19799] sibcall-3.c and sibcall-4.c xfailed on hppa64-*-hpux*

2005-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 06:41 --- The testcase is now xfailed but now it is missed optimization so suspending untill binutils is fixed. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/19831] Missing DSE/malloc/free optimization

2005-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-02-

[Bug target/19597] [4.0 Regression] avr-gcc 4.0, multiplication by constant, very long code

2005-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 07:02 --- Fixed. Thanks Roger for looking into this testcase. And thanks for all people who tested the patch to show it actually helps the code size. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/19828] [4.0 Regression] LIM is pulling out a pure function even though there is something which can modify global memory

2005-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 07:03 --- Confirmed via Daniel Berline via IRC and Drow via this bug. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/19489] gnat tools not buildable cross

2005-02-08 Thread neroden at twcny dot rr dot com
--- Additional Comments From neroden at twcny dot rr dot com 2005-02-09 07:13 --- Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross joel at oarcorp dot com wrote: > --- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-02-08 19:16 > --- > Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable

[Bug target/19597] [4.0 Regression] avr-gcc 4.0, multiplication by constant, very long code

2005-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 07:16 --- Actually Roger has not checked this in yet. I was misled by: . -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/19835] [4.0 Regression] [AVR] Loop variable gets widened to LONG instead of int

2005-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 07:17 --- There has to be a reason why we want to use long int instead of the integer type which is the same size of the pointer. Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug java/19834] Eclipse bytecode miscompiled with -O --indirect-dispatch

2005-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-09 07:20 --- Does this happen without -O if so this might not be a jave specific bug. When I am sober enough to look at testcase more, I will look into this one. -- What|Removed |Add

[Bug target/19597] [4.0 Regression] avr-gcc 4.0, multiplication by constant, very long code

2005-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.0.0 |--- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19597

[Bug target/19653] x87 reg allocated for constants for -mfpmath=sse

2005-02-08 Thread uros at kss-loka dot si
--- Additional Comments From uros at kss-loka dot si 2005-02-09 07:30 --- (In reply to comment #4) > rth hacked the constraints recently to have better ra for some fp cases. Can > you see if the bug is still there today on mainline? gcc version 4.0.0 20050209 (experimental) '-O2 -march

[Bug c++/19762] [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE in invalid explicit instantiation of a destructor

2005-02-08 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug c++/19787] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Internal compiler error with ambiguous conversion functions

2005-02-08 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug c++/19739] [3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE with additional comma in attribute

2005-02-08 Thread mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW

<    1   2