[Bug fortran/5900] [g77 & gfortran] Lapack regressions since g77 2.95.2

--- Additional Comments From jvdelisle at verizon dot net 2005-02-01 08:09 --- Note: Regarding Comment #26 All CGV failures have the same result regardless of matrix or seed: Matrix order=2, type=17, seed=1661,2075,1541,1865, result 5 is 8.389E+06 All ZGV failures have the same

[Bug c++/19739] New: ICE with additional comma in attribute

In a function attribute I had comma more than needed and I got an ICE. Below is a small program to demonstrate this: Michael Cieslinski void Dummy() __attribute__(( , )); void Dummy() {} int main (int argc, char **argv) { Dummy(); return 0; } when compiled it results in an ICE: g++

[Bug fortran/19691] gfortran reports "Internal Error: printf is broken"

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 09:06 --- Subject: Bug 19691 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-01 09:06:24 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran.h Log message

[Bug libfortran/19363] List directed write of Infinity and NaN has regressed

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 09:06 --- Subject: Bug 19363 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-01 09:06:24 Modified files: libgfortran: ChangeLog libgfortran.h Log message

[Bug libfortran/19363] List directed write of Infinity and NaN has regressed

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 09:14 --- Fixeth now, sirrs? -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 09:37 --- Neh, still there. I forgot to add the proper flags to the test case (which runs in a DejaGNU framework on my home box along with other PR test cases). Still a problem, so reconfirming. -- Wh

[Bug rtl-optimization/15242] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] pessimization of "goto *"

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 10:03 --- Subject: Bug 15242 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-01 10:03:27 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog basic-block.h bb-reorder.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/15242] [3.3/3.4 regression] pessimization of "goto *"

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 10:11 --- Should be fixed on mainline now. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|steven at gcc dot

[Bug c++/19737] typename requirement error

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-02-01 10:40 --- Subject: Re: New: typename requirement error "gianni at mariani dot ws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | In a recent posting by Daveed Vandervoorde on comp.std.c++, apparently the code | below is valid

Re: [Bug c++/19737] typename requirement error

"gianni at mariani dot ws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | BTW - gcc version 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5) accepts the | code, would this be a regression ? Previous versions of GCC did not quite understand the notion of "inject class name" and would erroneously accept things like str

[Bug c++/19737] typename requirement error

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-02-01 10:42 --- Subject: Re: typename requirement error "gianni at mariani dot ws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | BTW - gcc version 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5) accepts the | code, would this be a regressi

[Bug c++/19366] [4.0 Regression] Excessive duplicate error messages trying to treat '>>' as '> >'

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-02-01 10:48 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/19499] [3.4/4.0 regression] Bad diagnostic for namespace as template parameter

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-02-01 10:49 --- Fixed in 3.4.4 and 4.0.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug target/18977] [4.0 regression] LAPACK test xeigtsts segfaults with optimization

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-02-01 11:13 --- Jim, this is a ia64 regression that greatly affects Fortran (LAPACK), and there is a simple C testcase for it. Would you mind having a look? -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug java/19738] gcjh generates invalid class member floating-point initialisers

--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 11:19 --- A patch to avoid this error is at: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00255.html Note that the correct way to initialise a const float is apparently: class Foo { static const float b

[Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 11:35 --- I think we should just not do this non-statement-related check in verify_stmts. Patch posted for that: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00049.html -- What|Removed

[Bug c/19333] [4.0 Regression] C front end accepts arrays of incomplete types

-gnu/include -isystem /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/x86_64-linux-gnu/sys-include -L/home/packages/gcc/snap/gcc-snapshot-20050201/build/gcc/../ld -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -fPIC -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT

[Bug java/19738] gcjh generates invalid class member floating-point initialisers

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-02-01 12:36 --- Yes. Notice that also this code: struct A { static const int a = 45; }; is invalid without a matching definition. That is, you need to provide a single definition of: const int A::a; which obviously ca

[Bug c++/19739] ICE with additional comma in attribute

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 12:52 --- Hmm, we used to accept this before 3.4.0 and we still do in the C front-end. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug java/19738] gcjh generates invalid class member floating-point initialisers

--- Additional Comments From rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 13:01 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Yes. Notice that also this code: > > struct A > { > static const int a = 45; > }; > > is invalid without a matching definition. That is, you need to > provide a single definit

[Bug libfortran/19568] incorrect formatted read

--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-02-01 13:08 --- Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg02295.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19568

[Bug libgcj/19740] New: [Tracker] Yarrr issues tracker

I'm opening this bug to track problems that affect the development of Yarrr project: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/yarrr/ Feel free to add bugs whenever it's appropriate. -- Summary: [Tracker] Yarrr issues tracker Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status:

[Bug libgcj/19740] [Tracker] Yarrr issues tracker

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||19649 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19740

[Bug libgcj/19649] java.util.Date.getTimezoneOffset returns negated output

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19649

[Bug libgcj/19740] [meta-bug] Yarrr (compile time/runtime) issues tracker with GCJ

-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed||1 Keywords||meta-bug

[Bug c++/19739] [3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE with additional comma in attribute

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 13:25 --- This a regression no matter if this is valid or invalid code, an ICE from compiling/not compiling is a regression. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/13776] [4.0 Regression] Many C++ compile-time regressions for MICO's ORB code

--- Additional Comments From arend dot bayer at web dot de 2005-02-01 13:39 --- Karel, ir.ii does not compile since Mark Mitchell's patch to disallow floating point literals in constant expressions went in. I think if you could regenerated the preprocessed source, it should work again.

[Bug tree-optimization/19723] [4.0 Regression] A side effect is missed in 0 % a++.

--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-02-01 13:46 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] A side effect is missed in 0 % a++. Hi Richard, > > + /* X % 0, return X % 0 unchanged so that we can get the > > +proper warnings and errors. */ > > if (in

[Bug c++/19739] [3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE with additional comma in attribute

--- Additional Comments From joseph at codesourcery dot com 2005-02-01 13:49 --- Subject: Re: ICE with additional comma in attribute On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Hmm, we used to accept this before 3.4.0 and we still do in the C front-end. This is valid

[Bug c++/19735] Grammar "error" in error message.

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-02-01 13:57 --- I'm not a native speaker, but to me, too, this error message sounds very awkward. Even if the sentence should be grammatically correct, there is no reason we shouldn't choose a less awkward wording. I'd like t

[Bug c++/19741] New: less than optimal error message (actually, just appears wrong, use of ?)

(Such an error also appears to exist in 5458) In the attached example the following error appears: tpladdr.cc: In function `int main()': tpladdr.cc:21: error: no matching function for call to `Op::Exec(int, )' tpladdr.cc:14: error: candidates are: static bool Op::Exec(T, bool (*)(T)) [with T = int

[Bug c++/19741] less than optimal error message (actually, just appears wrong, use of ?)

--- Additional Comments From eda-qa at disemia dot com 2005-02-01 14:06 --- Created an attachment (id=8121) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8121&action=view) test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19741

[Bug target/16201] Assembler messages:Error: bad immediate value for offset (4116)

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 14:07 --- Subject: Bug 16201 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-01 14:07:03 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/arm : a

[Bug c++/19741] suboptimal error message for template functions (as opposed to non-templates)

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-02-01 14:27 --- This is in fact true. There is a mismatch between error messages for template function arguments and non-templates: void foo1(); template void foo2(); template b

[Bug tree-optimization/19723] [4.0 Regression] A side effect is missed in 0 % a++.

--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2005-02-01 14:49 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] A side effect is missed in 0 % a++. On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 22:36 -0800, Richard Henderson wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 08:45:34PM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > > + /* X

[Bug c++/19311] [3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE in resolve_overloaded_unification

--- Additional Comments From caolanm at redhat dot com 2005-02-01 15:04 --- breaks current OOo2 build -- What|Removed |Added CC||

[Bug target/16201] Assembler messages:Error: bad immediate value for offset (4116)

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 15:07 --- Subject: Bug 16201 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-01 15:07:05 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug target/16201] Assembler messages:Error: bad immediate value for offset (4116)

--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 15:08 --- Fixed -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/19735] Grammar "error" in error message.

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 15:28 --- Andrew is a native speaker. Really, he is. ;-) Anyway, even if the grammar of the message is correct (and I really don't think it is, but I am definitely not a native speaker), I think it is a really confus

template inheritance & this->

Hi! Consider the following program: - template class Base { public: A data_a; int count; }; template class Child: public Base { public: void inc() { this->count++; this->data_a++; // ISO C++ ok, universal. Base::count++; // ISO C++ ok. /

Re: template inheritance & this->

On Feb 1, 2005, at 10:46 AM, Grigorio V. Moshkin wrote: Hi! Are the comments fully correct? I.e. ISO C++ really denies that, and that's the only reason because gcc 3.4.x doesn't compile that? (gcc 3.3.3 does). Read the release notes for 3.4.x. It says the code is invalid C++. Basically namelookup

[Bug java/19738] gcjh generates invalid class member floating-point initialisers

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-02-01 15:57 --- Subject: Re: gcjh generates invalid class member floating-point initialisers "rmathew at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | A patch to avoid this error is at: | | http://gcc.gnu.or

Re: [Bug java/19738] gcjh generates invalid class member floating-point initialisers

"giovannibajo at libero dot it" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | In fact, I personally use this to expose constants without linkage: | | struct A { |enum { a = 45 }; | }; agree. | but with floating point numbers you are out of luck. Indeed. -- Gaby

[Bug java/19738] gcjh generates invalid class member floating-point initialisers

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-02-01 16:00 --- Subject: Re: gcjh generates invalid class member floating-point initialisers "giovannibajo at libero dot it" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] | In fact, I personally use this to expose constants wi

[Bug other/19717] -fdump-rtl-cse2 does not work as documented

--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-02-01 16:00 --- Adding Paolo Bonzini as he added -fdump-rtl-cse2. -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/19735] Grammar "error" in error message.

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-02-01 16:02 --- Subject: Re: Grammar "error" in error message. "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Andrew is a native speaker. Really, he is. ;-) | | Anyway, even if the grammar of the me

[Bug c++/19741] suboptimal error message for template functions (as opposed to non-templates)

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-02-01 16:04 --- Subject: Re: suboptimal error message for template functions (as opposed to non-templates) "bangerth at dealii dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This is in fact true. There is a mismatch betwee

[Bug java/19742] New: gcjh shouldn't mangle names in JNI output.

A java class has this: public static final int delete = 555; gcjh will correctly mangle the name delete (to delete$) for CNI header output. However, it also does this when generating JNI output (with gcjh -jni). We get output link this, and it is wrong: #undef foo_delete$ #define foo_delet

[Bug libfortran/19568] incorrect formatted read

--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-02-01 16:41 --- The patch does not handle advance="NO" correctly. I'll need to do something else. Thomas -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19568

[Bug tree-optimization/19670] [4.0 regression] testsuite failure: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-3.c compilation, -O1

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 17:21 --- Similar in nature to 19217 but in this case with flow sensitive aliasing. We visit a dead PHI which takes the address of several variables, but since it's dead, the alias analyzer never sees it. Since we

[Bug c++/19741] suboptimal error message for template functions (as opposed to non-templates)

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-02-01 17:30 --- Except that, of course, in the present case the overload set contains only a single function (foo2 isn't overloaded, and we have specified all template arguments). Which should make it even easier to handle t

[Bug c++/19735] Grammar "error" in error message.

--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2005-02-01 17:33 --- > Andrew is a native speaker. Really, he is. ;-) Ah, c'mon. He has improved recently. Me sure he have really. W. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/19742] gcjh shouldn't mangle names in JNI output.

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 17:36 --- I think this is related to PR 16843 well that might have been the bug before as we did not emit the final constants before. We still don't for Inherited constants. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug c++/19739] [3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE with additional comma in attribute

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 17:46 --- : Search converges between 2002-12-14-trunk (#159) and 2002-12-29-trunk (#160). This is caused by the new parser as JSM said this is valid. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion

--- Additional Comments From kon at iki dot fi 2005-02-01 18:03 --- Shouldn't this block bug 18131? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12459

[Bug c/19743] New: internal compiler error on errneous code

Following invalid C function gives internal compiler error on x86_64, but not on x86, on GCC 3.4.3 and 3.3.5: char blabla(unsigned int a) { return &((unsigned char *) &a)[0]; } 3.3.5 gives: $ ./gcc -Wall -O2 -c /test/char.c /test/char.c: In function `blabla': /test/char.c:3: warning: return ma

[Bug java/12459] Invalid inner class field access confusion

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 18:05 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Shouldn't this block bug 18131? Yes I must have missed this bug when creating that meta-bug. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/19743] internal compiler error on errneous code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 18:19 --- The code is undefined but still valid, well really it is invalid if you don't have a cast. This is all fixed on the mainline for 4.0.0 anyways and since this is not a regression closing as fixed. --

[Bug java/19738] gcjh generates invalid class member floating-point initialisers

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 18:38 --- Subject: Bug 19738 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-01 18:38:16 Modified files: gcc/java : ChangeLog gjavah.c Log message:

[Bug middle-end/19454] [4.0 Regression] bad code generated with gcc.c-torture/execute/bf64-1.c at -O1

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 18:43 --- Removing target milestone per: as it is known to not to effect primary/secondary targets. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/19736] [4.0 Regression] ICE with type mismatch between SSA_NAME and its symbol

--- Additional Comments From janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 18:45 --- Created an attachment (id=8122) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8122&action=view) minimized test case The test case can probably be minimized further but ought to be a better starting poin

[Bug tree-optimization/19736] [4.0 Regression] ICE with type mismatch between SSA_NAME and its symbol

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 19:12 --- Confirmed, reduce testcase: extern char *strcpy (char *, const char *); void sdbout_one_type (char *p) { int i, t = 1; char *q; for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) { strcpy (p, "1"); p += sizeof ("

[Bug rtl-optimization/17810] [3.4 Regression] internal compiler error: in verify_local_live_at_start for arm-rtems, arm-linux

--- Additional Comments From joel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 19:13 --- Neither icetest1 nor the reduced test case fails with gcc 4.0.0 20050124 when targeting arm-rtems4.7. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/19736] [4.0 Regression] ICE with type mismatch between SSA_NAME and its symbol

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 19:22 --- The bug is in redphi1 Since we are not running iterating dom at -O1, we get two phi's which can be reduced and one of them causes a call expression to be foldded and then we don't update the use infromat

[Bug tree-optimization/19736] [4.0 Regression] ICE with type mismatch between SSA_NAME and its symbol

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 19:38 --- This is the patch which I am testing to fix this (it fixes the problem which I describes): Index: tree-ssa.c === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/t

[Bug libfortran/19568] incorrect formatted read

--- Additional Comments From Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2005-02-01 20:01 --- Replying to myself here... After having thought of this, I think the patch should go in because it fixes a g77 regression, and advance= isn't among the things that g77 supports. Thomas -- http://gc

[Bug tree-optimization/19736] [4.0 Regression] ICE with type mismatch between SSA_NAME and its symbol

--- Additional Comments From stevenb at suse dot de 2005-02-01 20:09 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE with type mismatch between SSA_NAME and its symbol If all it takes is turning DOM back on, I'm quite fine with doing that also - having found out we can win much more with turnin

[Bug tree-optimization/19723] [4.0 Regression] A side effect is missed in 0 % a++.

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 20:20 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] A side effect is missed in 0 % a++. On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 07:49:16AM -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > Would would mean that we really can't do anything with DIV/MOD when > the nume

[Bug tree-optimization/19670] [4.0 regression] testsuite failure: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-3.c compilation, -O1

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 20:26 --- Subject: Bug 19670 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-01 20:26:27 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-ssa.c Log message:

[Bug tree-optimization/19633] local address incorrectly thought to escape

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 20:30 --- Subject: Bug 19633 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-01 20:30:08 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-flow.h tree-ssa-alias.

[Bug tree-optimization/19670] [4.0 regression] testsuite failure: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-3.c compilation, -O1

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 20:38 --- Fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00097.html. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/19696] gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/copysign1.c: Unsatisfied symbols: copysignl

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 20:57 --- Subject: Bug 19696 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-01 20:57:23 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog optabs.c optabs.h

[Bug other/19696] gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/copysign1.c: Unsatisfied symbols: copysignl

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 21:01 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug java/19742] gcjh shouldn't mangle names in JNI output.

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 21:04 --- I'm testing a patch -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |t

[Bug c++/18821] Please add warning if bits thrown away in integral conversions

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 21:10 --- The example given is in C++, not C; the C version is bug 2707. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/18977] [4.0 regression] LAPACK test xeigtsts segfaults with optimization

--- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2005-02-01 21:32 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] LAPACK test xeigtsts segfaults with optimization On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 03:13, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote: > --- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libe

[Bug c++/19744] New: ICE in if_convert with -fnon-call-exceptions -O2 on amd64

I'm running into an ICE on amd64 > /dept/rnd/vendor/gcc-3.4.3-amd64/bin/g++ -fnon-call-exceptions -O2 -g -c > test.C test.C: In member function `void M::foo() const': test.C:19: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. S

[Bug c++/19744] ICE in if_convert with -fnon-call-exceptions -O2 on amd64

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744

[Bug c++/19744] ICE in if_convert with -fnon-call-exceptions -O2 on amd64

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 22:04 --- If it reproduces on x86 with -msse, it's not an amd64 bug, but something realted to SSE/MMX (d'oh). Fun, didn't that just get rewritten for GCC 4.0? ;-) -- What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 22:50 --- Subject: Bug 19217 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-01 22:50:21 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-cfg.c Log message:

[Bug tree-optimization/19217] [4.0 Regression] ICE: verify_stmts failed: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 22:51 --- . -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED R

[Bug c/17807] [4.0 Regression] No warning/error for undefined local function.

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 23:03 --- Testing a patch. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jsm28

[Bug c/19435] spurious warnings with nested array constructors

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 23:04 --- Testing a patch. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jsm28

[Bug c/18502] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] trigraphs don't work with -std=gnu99

--- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 23:29 --- This is a regression from 3.0.x. Working on a patch. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedT

[Bug rtl-optimization/19744] ICE in if_convert with -fnon-call-exceptions -O2 on amd64

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 23:31 --- I think this is a dup of bug 14868 but note this has been fixed on the mainline but I think it is still a latent bug. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug bootstrap/18360] Can't bootastrap gcc 3.4.3 at FreeBSD using gcc mainline

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||19656 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18360

[Bug rtl-optimization/14868] ICE with -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -fnon-call-exceptions

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 23:45 --- *** Bug 19744 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14868

[Bug rtl-optimization/19744] ICE in if_convert with -fnon-call-exceptions -O2 on amd64

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 23:45 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14868 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/19736] [4.0 Regression] ICE with type mismatch between SSA_NAME and its symbol

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-01 23:52 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] ICE with type mismatch between SSA_NAME and > its symbol > > If all it takes is turning DOM back on, I'm quite fine with > doing that also - having

[Bug rtl-optimization/19744] ICE in if_convert with -fnon-call-exceptions -O2 on amd64

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-02 00:13 --- This may be fixed on mainline but not in GCC 3.4. Note that this reporter is the same as the reporter of Bug 14868 ;-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19744

[Bug rtl-optimization/14868] ICE with -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -fnon-call-exceptions

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-02 00:15 --- This may be fixed on mainline, but it's still broken in 3.4 and before. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/19680] sub-optimial register allocation with sse

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-02 00:31 --- Subject: Bug 19680 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-02 00:30:38 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/i386: i

[Bug java/19742] gcjh shouldn't mangle names in JNI output.

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-02 00:44 --- Subject: Bug 19742 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-02 00:44:09 Modified files: gcc/java : ChangeLog gjavah.c Log message:

[Bug java/19742] gcjh shouldn't mangle names in JNI output.

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-02 00:45 --- Fix checked in -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLV

[Bug target/19745] New: meta: cris-elf gcc, g++, objc testsuite failures as of "Tue Feb 1 22:03:59 UTC 2005"

This is a meta-bug for failing test-cases as of LAST_UPDATED "Tue Feb 1 22:03:59 UTC 2005" for cris-axis-elf (excluding fortran and libstdc++ failures), each failure to be further separately dealt with with a specific PC, this PR to depend on it; dependencies added to this PR for existing specific

[Bug rtl-optimization/14868] ICE with -msse2 -mfpmath=sse -fnon-call-exceptions

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-02 01:05 --- Hmm, the problem is that the earliest compare is not in the same BB as the jump. The reason why we don't ICE on the mainline is because they are in the same BB (but that might be wrong). -- W

[Bug target/19746] New: printf() optimisation ignores longcall attribute

Using the -O flag, the longcall attribute is ignored by the compiler when replacing printf() with puts(), even if a prototype for puts() exists with a long call. The test case below illustrates this. == int printf(const char *format, ...) __attribute__ ((__longcall__)); int puts(const char

[Bug libstdc++/19747] New: meta: cris-elf libstdc++ testsuite failures as of "Tue Feb 1 22:03:59 UTC 2005"

This is a meta-bug for failing test-cases as of LAST_UPDATED "Tue Feb 1 22:03:59 UTC 2005" for cris-axis-elf for libstdc++ failures, each failure to be further separately dealt with with a specific PC, this PR to depend on it; dependencies added to this PR for existing specific PR:s. To repeat, us

[Bug other/15514] a typo in docs

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-02 01:39 --- Subject: Bug 15514 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-02 01:39:33 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/doc: g

[Bug c++/19004] ICE in uses_template_parms at cp/pt.c:4860

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-02 01:45 --- Fixed for gcc 4.0.0. -- What|Removed |Added Summary|[3.4/4.0 regression] ICE in

  1   2   >