--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-12-07 00:15
---
*** Bug 18564 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18542
--- Additional Comments From tfillmore at beatware dot com 2004-12-07
00:29 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> I'm taking a look at this. Since I don't have interix, I need help from the
> bug reporter.
I've now set up an Interix system for the purpose of providing shell accounts.
Anyo
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16007
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
Priority|P2 |P3
Target Milestone|3.4.4 |---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07
00:36 ---
Closing as will not fix as d30v has been removed for a while on the mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-12-07 00:39
---
// small testcase, use '-O2'
void foo (int j, int k)
{
for(;;) {
switch (j) {
case 2: j = 1; break;
case 1: switch (k) {} break;
case 4: switch (k) {} break;
case 3
> --- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-06
> Look at the routines we implement in libgcc and ask again. We never did
> implement sub-word routines.
Which is an interesting point, but wouldn't it be more ideal to define
default built-in's for each of a target's defin
--- Additional Comments From belyshev at lubercy dot com 2004-12-07 01:17
---
// reduced testcase, use '-O2':
typedef struct lock {
void* holder;
int mux;
} lock;
void getHeavyLock (lock *lk, lock *old)
{
__sync_bool_compare_and_swap_di ((long *) old, (long) old, 1);
if (!lk)
Found during examination of objc.log of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2004-12/
msg00277.html
the exact version of GCC;
gcc version 4.0.0 20041205 (experimental)
the system type;
localhost:~ lars$ uname -a
Darwin localhost 7.2.1 Darwin Kernel Version 7.2.1: Wed Jul 14 03:00:02 PDT
200
--- Additional Comments From lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de
2004-12-07 02:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=7694)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7694&action=view)
preprocessed ObjC source
if you need more information (the original source or the assembl
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-12-07
02:08 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg00431.html
--
What|Removed |Added
K
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2004-12-07
02:27 ---
Fixed with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-12/msg00181.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07
02:28 ---
This is at least a 4.0 Regression, it worked with 3.3.2.
-Wselector -fgnu-runtime is enough to reproduce this bug and it is a bug and it
happens on more than
i686-darwin.
typedef struct objc_selector *SEL
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07
02:33 ---
The exact position of the end of the prologue is rather indeterminate as
scheduling blurs it. In the example, the %r26 register save was originally
generated after the stack adjustment but scheduling has in
--- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-12-07 02:58
---
It is in fact a 4.0 regression only. It compiles with gcc 3.4 as of
2004/10/15, but it fails with mainline from the same date.
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18862
--- Additional Comments From danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07
03:04 ---
Sorry, forget that last comment. the ldo is actually part of the epilogue.
The .loc should be after the stw.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18856
--- Additional Comments From dje at watson dot ibm dot com 2004-12-07
03:10 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] Another ICE caused by reload of a psuedo reg
into f0 for a DImode expr
There are two open questions:
1) Do we want to change the register preferencing?
2) Should we
--- Additional Comments From greenrd at greenrd dot org 2004-12-07 03:27
---
Appears to be already fixed in GNU classpath:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/classpath/classpath/java/io/BufferedInputStream.java.diff?r1=1.11&r2=1.12
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07
04:12 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18542 ***
Why did you mark this bug as a duplicate?
I intentionally split 18542 in to several separate PRs because I doubt this
compiled with
gcc version 4.0.0 20041206 (experimental)
Here is the test program (reduced from some code in the zlib compression
library):
void huft_build (const int *, int *);
struct inflate_huft_s {
union {
char Exop;
} word;
int base;
};
void huft_build(e, v)
const int *e;
int
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07
05:51 ---
This is the insn which is failing:
(insn 78 77 70 3 (set (strict_low_part (subreg:QI (reg/v:DI 0 r0 [orig:35 r ]
[35]) 0))
(plus:QI (mem:QI (reg/v/f:SI 3 r3 [orig:33 D1059 ] [33]) [2 S1 A32])
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-12-07 06:50
---
Ken,
The only 32-bit irix I can remember is irix5, what's odd about your machine that
you don't have the 64-bit libraries installed?
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07
06:59 ---
> Look at the routines we implement in libgcc and ask again. We never did
> implement sub-word routines.
Not sure what you meant with "never", but take a look at comment #6...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-12-07 07:21
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg00438.html
--
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Additional Comments From echristo at redhat dot com 2004-12-07 07:27
---
I doubt that Jan's patch is likely to be backported to 3.3 so I think we can
resolve the bug with an "upgrade" or "wontfix" for 3.3.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07
07:54 ---
Subject: Bug 17827
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-3_4-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-07 07:54:00
Modified files:
gcc: Change
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-07
07:55 ---
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg00407.html
--
What|Removed |Added
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
