[Bug c++/18384] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] ICE on zero-length array with empty initializer...

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-08 22:12 --- : Search converges between 2004-09-21-004002-3.4 (#77) and 2004-09-22-004001-3.4 (#78). : Search converges between 2004-09-20-161001-trunk (#551) and 2004-09-21-094824-trunk (#552). : Search converges bet

[Bug libgcj/18376] java.io.BufferedWriter outputing extraneous characters?

--- Additional Comments From tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-08 22:17 --- The code says: while (br.read(charBuff,0,fileLength) != -1) bw.write(charBuff,0,fileLength); There is no guarantee that read() will fill the buffer. If you see a partial read, you will then write a

[Bug bootstrap/18381] [4.0 Regression] Stage 1 failure in fixincludes, recent CVS

--- Additional Comments From James dot W dot Mckelvey at jpl dot nasa dot gov 2004-11-08 22:35 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Try removing 'build-fixincludes' from that line, tell me if it works. That worked! Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18381

[Bug tree-optimization/17742] [4.0 Regression] C Optimization error with -O1 on i686

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-08 23:20 --- Here's a reduced testcase. It goes into an infinite loop when compiled with optimization (-O, -O2, -O3, -Os). = int i=0; int main() { int j=0; while (++i<3) j = 1-j;

[Bug middle-end/17926] [4.0 Regression] infinite loop in LAPACK test at -Os and -O2

-- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||17742 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17926

[Bug tree-optimization/17742] [4.0 Regression] C Optimization error with -O1 on i686

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-08 23:25 --- This is most likely the same as PR 17926. -- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|

[Bug tree-optimization/17742] [4.0 Regression] C Optimization error with -O1 on i686

--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-08 23:38 --- Zdenek, the bug really appears with your ivopts patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-09/msg00234.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17742

[Bug rtl-optimization/11873] inefficient use of registers induces size and time overhead

-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11873

[Bug bootstrap/18385] New: Bootstrap code contains 68040 instructions

If I compile and link a file with -m68000 option the code contains still 68040 instructions in startup and finish code. We use the linker script mvem162.ld from Newlib which includes the .init and .fini sections (I think they are only necessary in C++ and Java). The problem is that the crtstuff.c

[Bug target/18385] code contains 68040 instructions

-- What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |target Summary|Bootstrap code contains |code contains 68040 |68040 instructio

[Bug tree-optimization/17742] [4.0 Regression] C Optimization error with -O1 on i686

--- Additional Comments From rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 00:15 --- This is a problem due to scev. It claims that j is an induction variable with step 1. Ummm Patch in testing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17742

[Bug c++/18386] New: ICE in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0

--with-gnu-ld --disable-nls --enable-languages=c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 4.0.0 20041108 (experimental) g++ -save-temps -c -g -fno-elide-constructors -pedantic-errors -Werror -ansi - no-common -fstrict-aliasing -Wall -Wold-style-cast -Wsign-promo -Wpointer-arith -Wconversion -Wundef -Wwrite

[Bug c++/18386] ICE in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0

--- Additional Comments From James dot W dot Mckelvey at jpl dot nasa dot gov 2004-11-09 00:34 --- Created an attachment (id=7494) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7494&action=view) Preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18386

[Bug target/18387] New: [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware build broken, thunk-related

With LAST_UPDATED: "Mon Nov 8 08:47:07 GMT 2004" I get (copy-pasted): /gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/home/hp/builds2/mmixware-sim/gcc/ -nostdinc++ -L/home/hp/builds2/mmixware-sim/mmix/libstdc++-v3/src -L/home/hp/builds2/mmixware-sim/mmix/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -nostdinc -B/home/hp/builds2/mmixware-s

[Bug target/18387] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware build broken, thunk-related

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 00:44 --- I almost think this is a binutils bug. -- What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug bootstrap/18388] New: bootstrapping failing on HP-UX 11.23/IA64

I'm trying to bootstrap gcc-3.4.3 on >uname -a HP-UX lvcapt B.11.23 U ia64 0104590984 unlimited-user license configured with configure --prefix=/opt/gcc343 --enable-shared \ --with-threads=posix --disable-nls \ --with-gnu-as=/opt/gcc342/bin/ia64-hp-hpux11.23-as \ I tried to bootstrap with >gc

[Bug bootstrap/18388] bootstrapping failing on HP-UX 11.23/IA64

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 00:56 --- You did not fully read: : f you have more than one assembler installed on your system, you may want to use this option in connection with --with-as=pathname. -- W

[Bug c++/18386] ICE in __static_initialization_and_destruction_0

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 00:57 --- I cannot reproduce this on a cross to i686-pc-linux. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18386

[Bug target/18387] [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware build broken, thunk-related

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 01:55 --- Re: #1, yes, it was. See http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2004-11/msg00153.html> for more. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/18149] [4.0 regression] bootstrap of i686-darwin

--- Additional Comments From lars dot sonchocky-helldorf at hamburg dot de 2004-11-09 01:59 --- Confirmed. See: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2004-11/msg00289.html Thanks, Lars -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/18389] New: [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE on struct declaration in for statement

The following invalid code snippet causes an ICE in 3.3.x, 3.4.3, and mainline (but not in 3.4.[012]): = void foo() { for (;struct A{};); } = -- Summary: [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE on struct declaration in for statem

[Bug c++/18389] [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE on struct declaration in for statement

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.3 3.3.5 3.4.3 4.0.0 Known to work||3.2.3 3.4.0 3.4.1 3.4.2 Target Milesto

[Bug c++/18389] [3.4/4.0 regression] ICE on struct declaration in for statement

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 02:46 --- : Search converges between 2004-10-10-161002-trunk (#588) and 2004-10-11-014001-trunk (#589). : Search converges between 2004-10-10-004002-3.4 (#94) and 2004-10-11-004001-3.4 (#95). -- What

[Bug bootstrap/18390] New: ICE during bootstrap build for gcc 3.4.3 and 3.3.5

I'm trying to build a newer version of gcc on a system with AIX 5.2. This is my configuration: ../gcc-3.4.3/configure --prefix=/genome/ctsa/opt/powerpc-aix/gcc-3.4.3 --enable-concept-checks --enable-languages=c,c++,f77 --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-nls followed by 'make profiledbootstrap'. This

[Bug bootstrap/18390] ICE during bootstrap build for gcc 3.4.3 and 3.3.5

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 03:00 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 9382 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/9382] AIX 5.2 ../../gcc-20030120/gcc/libgcc2.c:1161: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2175

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 03:00 --- *** Bug 18390 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/18019] [4.0 Regression] -march=pentium4 generates word fetch instead of byte fetch

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 04:50 --- No this is not related to PR 17949 at all. The behavior changed between 2004-01-18 and 2004-01-23. Which means most likely this: 2004-01-19 Roger Sayle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * config/i386/i386.md

[Bug fortran/17764] Compiler crash

--- Additional Comments From dmitrym at acres dot com dot au 2004-11-09 05:18 --- This bug is NOT a duplicate of the 16861. As of today, my test case compiles (and the bigger program the test case was derived from also compiles and works). The test program submitted with 16861 still does

[Bug fortran/16861] segfault with doubly used module

--- Additional Comments From dmitrym at acres dot com dot au 2004-11-09 05:35 --- The bug 17764 was incorrectly linked to this (see comments in that entry). I simplified the 20k source file above to ~600 bytes. Compilation attempt (using gfortran as of Nov 09, 2004) still gives "Interna

[Bug debug/16792] [4.0 regression] ICE in gen_subprogram_die, at dwarf2out.c:11267

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 05:42 --- Hmm, a couple big things happened those two days, some should figure out which patch which caused this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16792

[Bug target/17606] [4.0 Regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 05:57 --- Note my reduced testcase no longer fails but the orginal testcase still does. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/18391] New: internal error: Segmentation fault for valid code segment

Try to compile the following code in a cpp file, gcc crashes. Working on Redhat 7.2. #include #define b 5 int f; int foobar(int foo, int bar = (assert(f>=b), funcPtr)(), int foob=some_int); Reading specs from /shared/i80386linux/compiler/gcc3.2/linux2.4/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.2/specs

[Bug c++/18391] internal error: Segmentation fault for valid code segment

--- Additional Comments From asachdeva at gmail dot com 2004-11-09 06:15 --- Created an attachment (id=7496) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7496&action=view) Preprocessed file demonstrating the crash. It was just 48 lines, I havent bzip'd it -- http://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug c++/18391] internal error: Segmentation fault for valid code segment

--- Additional Comments From asachdeva at gmail dot com 2004-11-09 06:16 --- Created an attachment (id=7497) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7497&action=view) when compiled with -v -save-temps -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18391

[Bug c++/18391] internal error: Segmentation fault for valid code segment

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-09 06:20 --- Fixed already in 3.3. -- What|Removed |Added Severity|critical

[Bug c++/18391] internal error: Segmentation fault for valid code segment

--- Additional Comments From asachdeva at gmail dot com 2004-11-09 06:39 --- Subject: Re: internal error: Segmentation fault for valid code segment Was this bug filed earlier ? if yes, please send me the original bug number. Thanks -Arvind Sachdeva. On 9 Nov 2004 06:20:51 -, pin

[Bug c++/18369] [4.0 regression] Segfault on braced new

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW

<    1   2