[Bug target/99890] The -mstrict-align doesn't support the ARM targets

2021-04-06 Thread rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99890 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/99890] The -mstrict-aglign doesn't support the ARM targets

2021-04-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99890 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/99890] The -mstrict-aglign doesn't support the ARM targets

2021-04-03 Thread zmin1 at avic dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99890 --- Comment #2 from ZhangMin --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Because it is a target specific option. > What exactly are you trying to do? > > most instructions in ARMv7+ support unaligned data. Although armv7 + supports non al

[Bug target/99890] The -mstrict-aglign doesn't support the ARM targets

2021-04-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99890 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |target --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug c/99890] New: The -mstrict-aglign doesn't support the ARM targets

2021-04-03 Thread zmin1 at avic dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99890 Bug ID: 99890 Summary: The -mstrict-aglign doesn't support the ARM targets Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug ada/48368] missing support for ZCX on the ARM

2014-03-23 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48368 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/55516] strict volatile bitfields are done by what the ARM EABI says

2013-01-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55516 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janis at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/55516] strict volatile bitfields are done by what the ARM EABI says

2012-12-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
|regression |target Summary|strict volatile bitfields |strict volatile bitfields |are broken on ARM. |are done by what the ARM ||EABI says --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-12-09 01

[Bug ada/48368] missing support for ZCX on the ARM

2011-03-30 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
||2011.03.30 16:56:05 CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot ||gnu.org Summary|gnat on arm-linux-gnueabi |missing support for ZCX on |only has sjlj exception |the ARM

the arm

2010-09-21 Thread Burdine Racitano
I misunderstood you. I thought you said 'anybody,' and so I supposed 'anybody' included--well, anybody; that is, everybody." "It doth--anybody that is of lofty birth; and the better if he be royal." "That, it meseemeth, might well be," said the abbot, who saw his opportunity to smooth things and a