[Bug target/55516] strict volatile bitfields are done by what the ARM EABI says

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55516



Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:



           What    |Removed                     |Added

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

           Keywords|                            |wrong-code

          Component|regression                  |target

            Summary|strict volatile bitfields   |strict volatile bitfields

                   |are broken on ARM.          |are done by what the ARM

                   |                            |EABI says



--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-09 
01:43:01 UTC ---

I think the ARM EABI is broken anyways.  Volatile bitfields in general are

broken for more than one reason.  I wish people would stop using them.