[Bug c++/119895] New: List initialization of bitfield enum class member fails

2025-04-22 Thread vittorio.romeo at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119895 Bug ID: 119895 Summary: List initialization of bitfield enum class member fails Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/114123] New: list-initialization with a single element

2024-02-26 Thread yx_liu at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114123 Bug ID: 114123 Summary: list-initialization with a single element Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/114076] New: list-initialization with assignment expression triggers wrong template instanciation

2024-02-23 Thread benni.buch at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114076 Bug ID: 114076 Summary: list-initialization with assignment expression triggers wrong template instanciation Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug other/109709] New: List of prerequisites should include that tar is required (not only for unpacking the source).

2023-05-03 Thread me at manueljacob dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109709 Bug ID: 109709 Summary: List of prerequisites should include that tar is required (not only for unpacking the source). Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/109523] New: List-initializing constructor of std::vector is selected erroneously

2023-04-15 Thread fchelnokov at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109523 Bug ID: 109523 Summary: List-initializing constructor of std::vector is selected erroneously Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/109394] New: list-directed read of character from complex number

2023-04-03 Thread snavece at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109394 Bug ID: 109394 Summary: list-directed read of character from complex number Product: gcc Version: og11 (devel/omp/gcc-11) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/107531] New: List of references calls destructors, add warning?

2022-11-04 Thread nightstrike at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107531 Bug ID: 107531 Summary: List of references calls destructors, add warning? Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug c++/105804] New: List-initialized argument in await expression is doubly freed

2022-06-01 Thread blubban at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105804 Bug ID: 105804 Summary: List-initialized argument in await expression is doubly freed Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/101627] New: List-directed read with trailing characters after quotes

2021-07-26 Thread hj8758558 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101627 Bug ID: 101627 Summary: List-directed read with trailing characters after quotes Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/99273] New: List initialization prefers initializer_list a little too strongly

2021-02-25 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99273 Bug ID: 99273 Summary: List initialization prefers initializer_list a little too strongly Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

New list

2019-12-10 Thread Rebecca Harvey
Hi, Are you interested in acquiring a targeted marketing list to increase sales? We help you connect to the decision makers from the industries you want to reach. We can customize the verified list and provide contacts from the industries and location you want to reach to promote your produ

[Bug c++/89857] New: list-initialization of unnamed, non-const reference type

2019-03-27 Thread leni536 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89857 Bug ID: 89857 Summary: list-initialization of unnamed, non-const reference type Product: gcc Version: 8.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c++/85577] New: list-initialization chooses initializer-list constructor

2018-04-30 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85577 Bug ID: 85577 Summary: list-initialization chooses initializer-list constructor Product: gcc Version: 8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid

[Bug fortran/83561] New: list-directed output of an integer missing plus (+) sign when output open with SIGN="PLUS"

2017-12-22 Thread urbanjost at comcast dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83561 Bug ID: 83561 Summary: list-directed output of an integer missing plus (+) sign when output open with SIGN="PLUS" Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/83560] New: list-directed formatting of INTEGER is missing plus on output when output open with SIGN='PLUS'

2017-12-22 Thread urbanjost at comcast dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83560 Bug ID: 83560 Summary: list-directed formatting of INTEGER is missing plus on output when output open with SIGN='PLUS' Product: gcc Version: 6.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/78389] New: list::merge and list::sort are not exception safe

2016-11-16 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78389 Bug ID: 78389 Summary: list::merge and list::sort are not exception safe Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: l

[Bug libstdc++/78371] New: list::sort doesn't work with non-default-constructible allocators

2016-11-15 Thread rs2740 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78371 Bug ID: 78371 Summary: list::sort doesn't work with non-default-constructible allocators Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/77840] New: List-initialization and copy-constructor

2016-10-03 Thread wolfgang.roe...@gi-de.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77840 Bug ID: 77840 Summary: List-initialization and copy-constructor Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/76262] New: list-initialization prefers initializer_list over copy constructor

2016-08-13 Thread barry.revzin at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=76262 Bug ID: 76262 Summary: list-initialization prefers initializer_list over copy constructor Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/67259] New: list-initialization of a reference fails to initialize char array from string literal

2015-08-18 Thread cubbi at cubbi dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67259 Bug ID: 67259 Summary: list-initialization of a reference fails to initialize char array from string literal Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug c/64480] New: List designated initializer triggers -Wmissing-field-initializers

2015-01-03 Thread petr.pisar at atlas dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64480 Bug ID: 64480 Summary: List designated initializer triggers -Wmissing-field-initializers Product: gcc Version: 4.8.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/44703] New: List initialization fail if parameter is typedef name for the std::initializer_list

2010-06-28 Thread boostcpp at gmail dot com
List initialization fail if parameter is typedef-name of the std::initializer_list. #include typedef std::initializer_list type ; void f(type) {} int main() { // error: could not convert '{1, 2, 3}' to 'type' f({1,2,3}) ; } -- Summary: List initialization fail if parameter is

[Bug fortran/34420] New: List directed reads from file fails

2007-12-10 Thread eesrjhc at bath dot ac dot uk
Consider the following example: $cat myread.f integer n, i idmy character*2 typ(10) character*10 lab(10) character*40 wav(10) integer pos(10), neg(10), iat(10), ieq(10) complex val(10) open(10,file='XX',status='old') read(10,*,err=950,end=990) n

[Bug libfortran/19363] New: List directed write of Infinity and NaN has regressed

2005-01-10 Thread paulthomas2 at wanadoo dot fr
program test_list real x , y x = 0.0 y = 0.0 write(*,*,iostat=ier) x /y x = 1.0 write(*,*,iostat=ier) x /y end program test_list correctly gave with gfortran 20041010 $ ./a NaN +Infinity but now gives, for either NaN or Infinity, with gfortran 20050108 $ ./a At lin