[Bug tree-optimization/99997] Missed optimisation with -Os

2024-09-30 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||59660 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/99997] Missed optimisation with -Os

2023-05-23 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- I suspect if we do something about: # iftmp.0_8 = PHI <0(3), 1(4)> _9 = (_Bool) iftmp.0_8; First things might just work. Let me look into that. Plus there might be an expand issue ...

[Bug tree-optimization/99997] Missed optimisation with -Os

2022-02-01 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/99997] Missed optimisation with -Os

2021-08-03 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/99997] Missed optimisation with -Os

2021-04-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Component|c