On Fri, 2005-09-30 at 13:58 +, rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30
> 13:58 ---
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > volatile is needed here.
>
> No, the manual says:
> An @code{asm} instruction without any output
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30
13:58 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> volatile is needed here.
No, the manual says:
An @code{asm} instruction without any output operands will be treated
identically to a volatile @code{asm} instruction.
So this ins
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30
13:46 ---
volatile is needed here.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
