------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-30
13:58 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> volatile is needed here.
No, the manual says:
An @code{asm} instruction without any output operands will be treated
identically to a volatile @code{asm} instruction.
So this insn should be kept even though it isn't explicitly volatile.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24146
