--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-28 03:11 ---
To mark as a dup of bug 36327.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36327 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-28 03:10 ---
Reopening to ...
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-14
17:34 ---
This is the same issue as PR 14295 so closing as a dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14295 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-16 22:07
---
SRA shouldn't be responsible for this. There should be a generalized
block copy propagator. Which would help with copies far larger than
you'd ever expect SRA to handle as well.
--
What|Remove