------- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-16 22:07
-------
SRA shouldn't be responsible for this. There should be a generalized
block copy propagator. Which would help with copies far larger than
you'd ever expect SRA to handle as well.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|2004-12-07 18:51:32 |2004-12-16 22:07:40
date| |
Summary|missed SRA of a block copy |structure copy propagation
| |not done
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18268
