https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
--- Comment #24 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> Assuming fixed even on sparc*.
It is. I've missed this one when collecting instances of missing
vect_hw_misalign like PR tree-optimization/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ffd47fb63ddc024db847daa07f8ae27fffdfcb28
commit r14-9497-gffd47fb63ddc024db847daa07f8ae27fffdfcb28
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #20)
> Though, trying that in a cross to arm, with -march=armv9-a
> -munaligned-access it matches (in that case I believe vect_hw_misalign
> should be true), but it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
--- Comment #18 from Rainer Orth ---
Created attachment 57155
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57155&action=edit
32-bit sparc-sun-solaris2.11 pr113431.c.185t.slp1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #17 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b981d5c60b8ef78e2adecd6b5d7e36f9e5e61c54
commit r14-8207-gb981d5c60b8ef78e2adecd6b5d7e36f9e5e61c54
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
So the issue is that we ignore the dependence because
vect_preserves_scalar_order_p - which is correct iff we'd execute the
stmt within the vectorized loop body. But as we discover it invariant
we hoist i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #11)
> I think this following:
>
> https://godbolt.org/z/5sWEWWGox
>
> ARM SVE GCC-11 correctly vectorize this codes.
>
> But both GCC-12 and GCC-13 failed to vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
--- Comment #11 from JuzheZhong ---
I think this following:
https://godbolt.org/z/5sWEWWGox
ARM SVE GCC-11 correctly vectorize this codes.
But both GCC-12 and GCC-13 failed to vectorize it.
GCC-14 vectorize it in a wrong way.
Would it be po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|riscv |riscv aarch64-linux-gnu
16 matches
Mail list logo