https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113431
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #20)
> Though, trying that in a cross to arm, with -march=armv9-a
> -munaligned-access it matches (in that case I believe vect_hw_misalign
> should be true), but it matches even with -march=armv9-a
> -mno-unaligned-access (and in that case I think it should be
> !vect_hw_misaligned target).
> That said, sure, if it is
> /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "optimized: basic block part
> vectorized" 2 "slp1" { target { vect_int && vect_hw_misaligned } } } } */
> then it will simply not test anything on the non-vect_hw_misaligned targets,
> rather than say XPASS, so maybe that is ok.
>
> Richi, thoughts on that?
Yeah, I think that's OK.
